Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Politics | 02/11/2009 9:20 am

Sen. Boxer on Stimulus: Doing Nothing Is a 'Hostile Act'

By The Staff at wowOwow.com
© Getty Images

Sen. Barbara Boxer’s steaming mad over the economic stimulus package!

Not only are all but three Senate Republicans refusing to support the $838 billion economic rescue bill, but the Senate will need 60 votes to avoid a Republican filibuster, and none of these things please the California Democrat. "This isn’t easy but to say to do nothing … to do nothing is a hostile act on the American people," said Boxer during an interview with MSNBC this morning, noting that 500,000 jobs are being lost a month, with 600,000 lost in January alone. "You can’t do nothing — there’s no dollars out there."

The Senate approved the bill Tuesday
, but now it’s up to House and Senate negotiators to hammer out the differences between their two versions; the House bill is $819 billion. But then, the final bill has to go back to both houses for passage — again. Lawmakers hope a compromise bill can be sent to President Obama by the end of the week for his signature. That means they have to work fast.

"They’re forcing us to get 60 votes," Boxer said of Republicans, adding that even the ailing cancer-stricken Sen. Ted Kennedy, D-MA, came back to vote to make sure Democrats have enough support. "If they didn’t have a 60-vote hurdle for everything, we could get this done. It’s very difficult for me, as a person of action, to see this happen … let’s just have a vote."

Centrist senators like Sen. Susan Collins, R-ME, Sen. Arlen Specter, R-PA, Sen. Ben Nelson, D-NE, and Sen. Olympia Snow, R-ME, are promising to vote against the bill if it comes back with a higher price tag. Meanwhile, in the House, Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-CA, has been raging against the Senate’s take-it-or-leave it approach to the stimulus bill. In fact, she’s so mad, that she cut off fellow Democrats from complaining about it during a Tuesday caucus meeting because it just got her blood boiling more. Both Obama and Pelosi want to restore much of the spending cut by the Senate, particularly $21 billion in school construction and technology grants, $10.3 billion in COBRA insurance and $8.6 billion in new Medicaid coverage for the unemployed.

"At a certain point, after a couple of members had expressed themselves, she asked that future speakers not address that issue because it was reminding her how angry she was," Rep. Anthony D. Weiner, D-NY, told Politico.

There’s tough negotiations on the stimulus still to come. Let’s hope cooler heads prevail!

247 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Diana T
I gained a lot of respect for the honorable Senators from Maine yesterday when they put their concern for this nation ahead of their political aspirations. Just like the old days. http://www.brookings.edu/papers/2009/0210_bank_rescue_elliott.aspx
By Diana T on 02/11/2009 9:36 am
alex harvey
Those republicans are not honorable. When you’re on a team, you play for that team. You don’t make side deals. They didn’t put any political aspirations aside, they were promised something.
By alex harvey on 02/11/2009 4:21 pm
Zera Lee
So that’s a “no” to “Country First”. What a surprise…
By Zera Lee on 02/11/2009 6:52 pm
alex harvey
This spendulus is not about the country. Its about Obama getting a second term. The economy is already getting better, spending is up with no spendulus. Think about why Obama wanted this to go through so soon. Its not about jobs, its about him. He wants to take credit for the economy with this stupid bill. Don’t you just love Pelosi vs Reid?
By alex harvey on 02/12/2009 5:28 pm
Zera Lee
Naw, President Obama thinks we should stop the layoffs sooner rather than later, or not at all - like the GOP wants. The GOP is passionately putting their party ahead of the needs of the country. They are ready to crucify the three who did put country first. Even today, Judd Gregg withdrew from Obama’s attempt at a coalition government because Gregg just couldn’t bear to work in a bipartisan way. Keep dreaming, Paul Joseph.
By Zera Lee on 02/12/2009 8:06 pm
deber B
Alex, if the tables were turned and they democrats had three who left the team, wonder what they would be calling them right now? Goes both ways.
By deber B on 02/12/2009 5:03 am
alex harvey
3 republicans, thats a good way to lead. Obama has to stop campaigning, and start governing.
By alex harvey on 02/12/2009 5:47 pm
Razzel Dazzel
Are Rethugs are a hostile act. And a boring one. 
By Razzel Dazzel on 02/18/2009 12:59 am
~ countrywoman ~
I agree with you, Diana, they are courageous leaders who were willing to put country ahead of politics…….how refreshing! Thanks for the link.
By ~ countrywoman ~ on 02/11/2009 10:46 pm
Cheryl Mitchell
I wish I could just stop watching the the news and seeing the nasty fighting when the nation is in so much trouble. But I can’t, so I find myself praying, and praying…It seems as if these people are simply posturing for the cameras.
By Cheryl Mitchell on 02/11/2009 9:48 am
caj p
I think it will be a crying shame if this bill does not go through…why would anyone not want to get this country moving again just to be stubborn. It may not have all the answers, how can it the task is overwhelming to say the least…but to do nothing to me is a slap in the face of the American people. Even more so if it is being voted against simply because those Repubs don’t want to be seen as “turncoats”…doing it for the right reasons is one thing doing it for the latter is disgraceful and they should be ashamed if that’s the case. It will come back to haunt them if that is their intention.
By caj p on 02/11/2009 9:52 am
deber B
Actually, it’s a crying shame that it will go through. America doesn’t need it. Democrats need it.
By deber B on 02/12/2009 5:04 am
S.J. Morgan
It’s a BAD bill! That is why they oppose it!
By S.J. Morgan on 02/11/2009 9:54 am
Marjorie C.
S.J. It’s a BAD bill! That is why they oppose it! Yes it is. Clean it up and it will fly through. Get rid of some of the most obnoxious pork and let the Repubs have some of their tax cuts. Compromise. Can’t have everything one way, even if the Dems think they won.
By Marjorie C. on 02/11/2009 10:14 am
f p
Explain for me the tax breaks the repubs currently want after Georgie’s tax breaks and 6 trillion dollar deficit. Do that and then you can bitch about the current bill all you want.
By f p on 02/11/2009 11:30 am