Sheila…you’re right. It makes the division very clear. Lets just hope the American people will choice the Obama ticket. Because it looks like we are headed for a conservative gover’t up here in Canada. May the force be with us all !

As long as lots of women like myself remember that we DON’T WANT 4 XTRA YRS OF A FAILED ECONOMY W/THE REPUBLICANS IN OFFICE I think that we will make the RIGHT CHOICE, yes she’s a woman BUT she’s a Republican and remember this Hillary voters maybe miffed but we are not STUPID, WE ARE VOTING 4 OBAMA.

From your fingers to some of their ears Mrs. Cheryl Hampton.

Or would that be eyes? Oh well, you get the meaning.

A wonderful choice? A clear choice? I have to disagree I do agree that choice may be “what America stands for” but in this case I think McCain’s team is guilty of a very deliberate manipulation, a gimmick to try to attract attention, to attempt to win women’s votes

EXTREMELY disappointed in you Shelia. Thank you for helping to dumb down the US as if it isn’t stupid enough. From David Mark, Fred Barbash at Politico: PRESIDENTIAL SCHOLARS PAN PALIN PICK Leaving Presidential scholars literally stunned they say she appears to be the least experienced, least credentialed person to join a major-party ticket. said Joel Goldstein, a St. Louis University law professor and scholar of the vice presidency. “Being governor of a small state for less than two years is not consistent with who’s of presidential caliber.” “She is the most inexperienced person on a major party ticket in modern history,” said presidential historian Matthew Dallek. That includes Spiro T. Agnew, Dan Quayle, who had served in the House and Senate for 12 years before taking office, and iGeraldine Ferraro, who served three terms in the House before Walter Mondale chose her in 1984 as the first woman candidate on a major party ticket. “It makes Obama look like an elder statesman. Palin has no experience in national office. Before becoming governor in December 2006, she served as a council member and mayor of Wasilla, Alaska, which had a population of slightly more than 5,000 during her time in office.” Palin is a total “wild card,” said Stanford historian David Kennedy. “The first thing that hits me,” said Stephen Hess of the Brookings Institution,” is that it suggests that John McCain is a gambler. “The next thing you have to ask yourself: Is it worrisome to have a gambler in the Oval Office? That’s an important question,” he said, “perhaps more important than anything else today.”