Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Politics | 11/18/2008 10:45 am

Traitors to the Cause? Some Anti-Abortion Activists Now Trying to Reduce Abortions, Not Outlaw Them

By The Staff at wowOwow.com
© iStock

Apparently realizing that overturning Roe v. Wade won’t be possible anytime in the near future — especially with Barack Obama as president — a growing number of abortion opponents are scaling back on efforts to outlaw the practice.

Instead, these anti-abortion pastors, conservative academics and activists are focusing on building social programs and developing other assistance for pregnant women to reduce the number of abortions, The Washington Post reports. But they still believe the practice is immoral.

"If one strategy has failed and failed over decades, and you have empirical information that tells how you can honor life and encourage women to make that choice by meeting real needs that are existing and tangible, why not do that?" said Douglas W. Kmiec, a law professor at Pepperdine University who served in the Reagan and George H.W. Bush administrations. Kmiec, a Catholic who opposes abortion, was criticized by some abortion foes because he endorsed Obama for president.

Not only has Obama voiced support for a woman’s right to choose, but voters in several states this year defeated ballot measures that would have restricted access to abortions.

Unbelievably enough, some of the activists are actually working hand-in-hand with abortion rights advocates to push for legislation in Congress that would provide pregnant women with health care, child care and money for education.

And their efforts are causing some in the anti-abortion movement to brand them traitors to the cause.

"It’s a sellout, as far as we are concerned," Joe Scheidler, founder of the Pro-Life Action League, told the Post. "We don’t think it’s really genuine. You don’t have to have a lot of social programs to cut down on abortions."

Meanwhile, a controversial rule President Bush is trying to put in place may go into effect soon.

That rule would prohibit health-care facilities receiving federal money from discriminating against doctors, nurses and other health-care workers who refuse to perform or to assist in the performance of abortions or sterilization procedures because of their “religious beliefs or moral convictions.”

But The New York Times reports that even the government agency that enforces job discrimination laws has joined the chorus of protests from women and family-planning groups, and others, against the rule.

Three officials from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission say the proposal would overturn 40 years of civil-rights law prohibiting job discrimination based on religion. They also say neither the Department of Health and Human Services nor the White House consulted their agency before issuing the proposed rule.

HHS intends to issue a final version of the rule within days. Aides and advisers to President-elect Obama say he would try to rescind it, but that process could take three to six months.

26 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Jennifer Dooley
Golly What a concept!!!Trying to Reduce Abortions, Not Outlaw Them…
By Jennifer Dooley on 11/18/2008 11:21 am
John G
Abstinence makes the heart grow fonder… Jeeze, why can’t pro-lifers crawl back under their rocks and shut-the-F-up??!!??
By John G on 11/18/2008 11:37 am
Murnah H
I have to agree. I’m always amazed at their lack of compassion. Maybe they’ll learn that being proactive is more satisfying than making life more frightening for others.
By Murnah H on 11/18/2008 7:51 pm
Belinda Joy
Kudos to you Douglas W. Kmiec and all those that believe as you do! I can’t think of anyone that is pro-abortion and loves the thought that women are having them. It has always been and should always be about giving females choices. Providing the education upfront to make the option of abortion a moot point because they took the necessary steps to avoid becoming pregnant. It doesn’t happen every day, but I have to say this wOw post truly made my day! It is so uplifting to me to know that pro-choice objectives are finally (albeit on a small scale) being understood by those who would normally shun it.
By Belinda Joy on 11/18/2008 11:46 am
DeBúrca obj
Bravo. Perhaps we have actually moved into an era of rational people working together toward the common good instead of knee-jerk divisiveness.
By DeBúrca obj on 11/18/2008 1:01 pm
Sybelle J
It’s a sellout, as far as we are concerned,” Joe Scheidler, founder of the Pro-Life Action League, told the Post. “We don’t think it’s really genuine. You don’t have to have a lot of social programs to cut down on abortions.” Wonder how many kids, Joe’s adoptin? He’s right, women who can’t afford the procedure will still keep poppin out babies. To me, it seems like the concern by this group to make sure a child is born, evaporates at the birth. They’ve done their part. Way to go Joe! (lunch is makin me sleeeeepy)
By Sybelle J on 11/18/2008 1:15 pm
rocky rocky
I’m so glad to hear this news. I find it difficult to believe that anyone anywhere is “pro” abortion. But I can never support the government having control of a woman’s body, cause that would be too much like the Taliban or Al queda. No, IMO working together to make sure women can choose whether or not they want to get pregnant in the first place is a very smart and logical thing to do.
By rocky rocky on 11/18/2008 2:30 pm
beverly linens
I don’t think they are working on that part, avoiding pregnancy in the first place but choice after the fact.
By beverly linens on 11/18/2008 10:48 pm
rocky rocky
Thanks, Bev. Yep, you’re right. I re-read the article. Guess I “heard” what I wanted to hear. But still it’s better than fighting over irrevocable differences. Gets a lot more done.
By rocky rocky on 11/19/2008 1:34 am
beverly linens
rocky rocky, it’s a start. Maybe if they see what really happens to unwanted kids they might change their stand on birth control. We can always hope!
By beverly linens on 11/19/2008 1:56 am
rocky rocky
Gosh. The very thought. “unwanted” kids. My heart cries out. I don’t know if “seeing” would help. It’s that religion thing. Can’t change ideas based on faith. But, yes, Bev, it’s a start. Hey. I don’t know where you live but it’s 3:40 a.m. here and I’m up because I’m trying to meet a morning deadline. What are you doing up so late?
By rocky rocky on 11/19/2008 2:42 am
beverly linens
Portland Oregon, I’m a natural born night owl. It was one of the reasons I was self employed most of my life. I won’t go to bed until the paper hits the front door. Just finished watching Charlie Rose. It is 2 am what kind of dead line?
By beverly linens on 11/19/2008 3:03 am
rocky rocky
I’m a textbook editor (can’t tell by all the typos I usually make, I know). Freelancer. I’m reading page proofs, which must be okayed and off to production tomorrow (today?) What is your self-employment?
By rocky rocky on 11/19/2008 3:13 am
beverly linens
In 1965 I started a drapery window products business that I ran out of my house and as I grew I farmed out the boring stuff and constructed the fun creative stuff. I often worked as an interior designer. But never got a store front so was always able to work at night. I never took an appointment before 10 am. You can do things like that when you are the boss. At the end I was doing slipcovers. That was fun like constructing a puzzle more like engineering than sewing. I shut it down about five years ago. Now I climb into books and look up and discover it is 5 am. You’d think that at 71 I’d get too old to do this but it isn’t happening. But can’t stay up all night and work all day like I used to. I do have to get some sleep. I’ve been writing essays for years and the last two years working on a memoir. The writing and reading was a necessary balance to the physical part of my job. I want to explain that I don’t really believe in a connected energy for all of us on the one hand but for some reason I swear I get more creative and productive after 11pm. Weird. Have a nice night getting your work done. Bev.
By beverly linens on 11/19/2008 3:50 am
rocky rocky
Sounds like you’re retired? Thought I’d be retired by now. But as long as I can work, I’ll have to. SInce I started freelancing — gosh, it’s been more than 15 years now — my body’s clock is totally screwed up. Illness also affected sleep patterns. So, I just go with the flow. Sleep cycle, regular or not, is not something on my list to fret about. Lots of other stuff there already. Keep reading and especially keep writing, Beverly. Nothing more satisfying as far as I can tell. Best, R.
By rocky rocky on 11/19/2008 4:11 am