Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Politics | 11/18/2008 10:45 am

Traitors to the Cause? Some Anti-Abortion Activists Now Trying to Reduce Abortions, Not Outlaw Them

By The Staff at wowOwow.com
© iStock

Apparently realizing that overturning Roe v. Wade won’t be possible anytime in the near future — especially with Barack Obama as president — a growing number of abortion opponents are scaling back on efforts to outlaw the practice.

Instead, these anti-abortion pastors, conservative academics and activists are focusing on building social programs and developing other assistance for pregnant women to reduce the number of abortions, The Washington Post reports. But they still believe the practice is immoral.

"If one strategy has failed and failed over decades, and you have empirical information that tells how you can honor life and encourage women to make that choice by meeting real needs that are existing and tangible, why not do that?" said Douglas W. Kmiec, a law professor at Pepperdine University who served in the Reagan and George H.W. Bush administrations. Kmiec, a Catholic who opposes abortion, was criticized by some abortion foes because he endorsed Obama for president.

Not only has Obama voiced support for a woman’s right to choose, but voters in several states this year defeated ballot measures that would have restricted access to abortions.

Unbelievably enough, some of the activists are actually working hand-in-hand with abortion rights advocates to push for legislation in Congress that would provide pregnant women with health care, child care and money for education.

And their efforts are causing some in the anti-abortion movement to brand them traitors to the cause.

"It’s a sellout, as far as we are concerned," Joe Scheidler, founder of the Pro-Life Action League, told the Post. "We don’t think it’s really genuine. You don’t have to have a lot of social programs to cut down on abortions."

Meanwhile, a controversial rule President Bush is trying to put in place may go into effect soon.

That rule would prohibit health-care facilities receiving federal money from discriminating against doctors, nurses and other health-care workers who refuse to perform or to assist in the performance of abortions or sterilization procedures because of their “religious beliefs or moral convictions.”

But The New York Times reports that even the government agency that enforces job discrimination laws has joined the chorus of protests from women and family-planning groups, and others, against the rule.

Three officials from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission say the proposal would overturn 40 years of civil-rights law prohibiting job discrimination based on religion. They also say neither the Department of Health and Human Services nor the White House consulted their agency before issuing the proposed rule.

HHS intends to issue a final version of the rule within days. Aides and advisers to President-elect Obama say he would try to rescind it, but that process could take three to six months.

26 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

beverly linens
Just sorta retired. Eleven years ago I sold my house and bought a 108 years old house that had been turned into a tri-plex. So I live in one and rent out the other two. I have two single garages I rent out plus a garage with a glass door that opens into my garden that I rent out as an art studio, I ran my business out of the basement for a few years and oh hell might have to again someday. So earn my retirement that way. Keeping a 108 year old house together. It is always something. I’m not complaining just telling it like it is. It’s actually fun and keeps me young. I’m close in in the city and it is never boring. My tenants are young because they want to live where the action is. It is here and all around here.
By beverly linens on 11/19/2008 4:45 am
rocky rocky
Sounds good all around. Especially like the idea of a 108-year-old house! Early 1900s. Victorian? Nice cozy rooms, but small closets. Lots of fire places. Ghosts? … I’m in a condo (so! uninteresting) close to NYC, which is really nice. Still lots of farm country out here, protected forest and wetlands, all fighting back against the push and squeeze of suburban housing and malls. But please forgive me, Beverly, I must catch a few winks before my next batch of work is due. Good night/dawn. Fun talking (really). Do it again? ~ ~ R.
By rocky rocky on 11/19/2008 5:17 am
Ky McQueen
I guess the unborn is more important than the children currently homeless or in foster homes. What about putting the time and money invested in this nonsense to take care of THOSE CHILDREN!!!! To many mothers can’t even feed their children now!!!! I just spent 200 dollars on my next door neighbor’s new baby. She is alone with no job, no money, and a new baby…SHE IS ONLY 18!!!!
By Ky McQueen on 11/18/2008 7:44 pm
DeBúrca obj
These same anti-choice groups, if you dig a little deeper you find they are also anti-birth control. If they had their way we’d have no choice about ANYTHING in our lives.
By DeBúrca obj on 11/18/2008 8:35 pm
Lee Harrison
The way I see it, the most effective way to cut down on abortion is to promote birth control and make it free.
By Lee Harrison on 11/18/2008 9:30 pm
Diana T
Thank you, Lee! I have always said if you don’t believe in abortion, then don’t let yourself get pregnant. It IS a woman’s choice, no matter what. There is no reason women, young and old can’t be taught that one little rule. Have you noticed how many prominent pro-lifers are men? What do they have to do with it other than planting that happy little sperm so it can find its ova. We forget, or perhaps many women are simply too young to remember the mood of the nation when abortion was made legal. When I was very young in the 50’s, and into the 60’s, I have distinct memory of the conditions that led up to this decision. The whole reason abortion was made legal was so that In The Event One Was Necessary, women, particularily young school girls would not try to seek out a filthy, dangerous and life threatening one. The concensus of opinion was that no one wanted to encourage abortions, but if there was going to be one, then may it be safe, sterile and performed in a setting with a qualified physician who knew what he was doing. I remember the horror of seeing pictures and hearing about attempts of self-induced abortions, or illegal ones in abhorrent conditions, and in both situations the results were the same—-death by bleeding to death or septic shock. So, 3 cheers for sensible, free birth control for anyone who wants it. And, for women deciding to take charge of their own bodies. And for Planned Parenthood!
By Diana T on 11/18/2008 11:16 pm
Maurine H
Yes, absolutely, Diana, to you and to Lee! I’m on the board of our local Choice organization, and I can tell you that the people who oppose Choice for Women are ignorant, narrow-minded, judgmental and self-aggrandizing men and women who don’t give a damn about unwanted children once they are born. I have never seen one of these individuals, so vehement in their insistence on protecting the “unborn”, step up and offer to adopt or care for a child whose mother cannot care for it. No one wants to have an abortion. It is a painful, heart wrenching decision for any woman. For that reason, our organization concentrates on education, not only about preventing unwanted pregnancies but also about the prevention of STDs and AIDS. And we offer free testing and referrals to Planned Parenthood, since there are no doctors in this county who will perform abortions. And still there are people who would like to ban sex-ed materials and the use of condoms. Education is the answer to so many of our society’s challenges - especially education about how to keep our bodies healthy.
By Maurine H on 11/19/2008 12:07 am
beverly linens
Diana there were even doctors who refused to help women who had botched abortions. It was pretty ufly out there and its been long enough that there aren’t many who remember. Sometimes I feel like we have to live lessons over and over again. Have you read about Bush and Co.’s effort to get a directive in effect to restrict the access of birth control. It never ends. I think it is about controling woman in whatever way possible.
By beverly linens on 11/19/2008 2:37 am
Diana T
You know, Beverly, when one thinks about it, why should a man ever have a decision when it comes to a woman’s body? The only people involved are the couple(and sometimes not even that!) and the doctor. You are right; historically, it’s been about control. And historically, women have been figuring out ways to terminate pregnancies since the Egyptians and before. I will never ever forget the fear and pain I felt while I was a teen upon seeing a horrible picture in Time or Newsweek—one of the weekly news magazines, I forget— of a girl lying in a pool of blood on a dirty bed after a botched abortion involving a coat hanger. That changed me forever, and nowdays, I feel like we have totally left these mostly young ladies out of the equation, allowing very uninformed men to make the rules and laws.
By Diana T on 11/19/2008 9:42 am