Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Politics | 11/07/2008 8:30 am

Spitzer Escapes Charges in Prostitution Scandal

By The Staff at wowOwow.com
© AP

Eliot Spitzer certainly got off the hook.

Federal prosecutors said Thursday the former New York governor won’t face criminal charges for patronizing a high-priced prostitution ring.

The U.S. attorney in Manhattan, Michael. J. Garcia, said Thursday that even though investigators found that Spitzer arranged for call girls to travel from one state to another to be his personal companions while he was on state business, there was no evidence he used public money or campaign funds to pay for his entertainment.

Spitzer was a client of the Emperor’s Club VIP – an international prostitution ring to which Spitzer paid $1 million.

“In addition,” Garcia said in a statement, “we have determined that there is insufficient evidence to bring charges against Mr. Spitzer for any offense relating to the withdrawal of funds for, and his payments to, the Emperor’s Club VIP.”

Garcia said Spitzer has cooperated with the investigation, and, since federal authorities typically don’t go after johns, filing criminal charges wouldn’t be in the public interest.

Spitzer resigned as governor in March, two days after The New York Times reported that he had been a customer of the prostitution service that charged as much as $5,500 an hour.

“I acknowledge and accept responsibility for the conduct it disclosed," Spitzer said of the federal investigation. "I resigned my position as governor because I recognized that conduct was unworthy of an elected official … I once again apologize for my actions,” he said in the statement, “and for the pain and disappointment those actions caused my family and the many people who supported me during my career in public life.”

Several people briefed on the case told The New York Times that in recent months, Spitzer’s lawyers made several presentations to prosecutors from the Public Corruption unit in Garcia’s office and their superiors to argue against charges.

The presentations allegedly focused on the defense team’s argument that no campaign money or state funds were involved, that Spitzer didn’t illegally structure the transactions to pay the prostitutes and that charges were not warranted under the federal law which prohibits transporting people across state lines for the purpose of prostitution.

8 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

dean whitman
This reminds me of that sicko movie with Tom Cruse > ? Eyes wide shut or something ? Well this is so perverted ..its sicko ..I lost all respect for Tom and his wife when I saw that movie I rented with my hard earned money ..I was very upset after watching it . I want to know do these women have “Health Cards” ? I know they do in Vegas .I feel sorry for the women …period .Not these men …if ya wanna call them that .Oh this is just so perverted ….its SICKO !
By dean whitman on 11/07/2008 8:54 am
Lucinda Herbert
even though investigators found that Spitzer arranged for call girls to travel from one state to another to be his personal companions while he was on state business, there was no evidence he used public money or campaign funds to pay for his entertainment.” Isn’t that a violation of the Mann act? Anybody, who lives in New York, knows that that in itself would have been sufficient for the self-described ‘steamroller’ to destroy someone else’s life. “Garcia said Spitzer has cooperated with the investigation, and, since federal authorities typically don’t go after johns, filing criminal charges wouldn’t be in the public interest.” I’d say it would be more accurate to say that filing criminal charges wouldn’t be in Spitzer’s interest and since he cooperated, they are throwing him a bone. Somebody is still interested in remaining on Spitzer’s good side. Eliot’s got to have bigger plans than working at Dad’s office and playing tennis.
By Lucinda Herbert on 11/07/2008 8:59 am
James the Game
They ought to throw him in the klink, and throw away the key.
By James the Game on 11/07/2008 9:20 am
Mommy Dearest
This old broad thinks prostitution should be legalized, prostitutes should be provided physical protection and health care through unionization, and the johns’ payments be taxed, as are cigarettes and liquor. Prior to that, dears, beware of ANYONE who holds himself up to be morally superior. In my experience, dahlings, it’s rarely the case, and the fall is long and hard, if you will pardon my use of those words in this context.
By Mommy Dearest on 11/07/2008 9:42 am
Tee Zee
I’m with you Mommy, if they’re not going to proceute everyone then make it legal, get these women the proper health care and let’s move on. Same with drugs, all these small time dealers who wouldn’t cooperate are clogging the penal system learning new crimes. So when they are released there’s no honest work for them, decriminalize the small amounts, let them all go.
By Tee Zee on 11/07/2008 11:13 am
John G
uhhh, where’d he get the money? Wasn’t he paid by “the people”? Burn ‘em!
By John G on 11/07/2008 10:43 am
Brooklyn Gal
This finding doesn’t surprise me because he is still rich and I am sure still knows where certain bodies are buried during his time as both the AG and Governor of NY. But he did hold himself up to a higher standard and did violate the law, and I would have had no problem if his “John” status had found him guilty. I can’t imagine him running for any office again. He will not get my vote.
By Brooklyn Gal on 11/07/2008 10:46 am
Elizabeth Bennett
This is more of a comment on the Department of Justice than it is on Eliot Spitzer. Since when it is more important to prosecute Martha Stewart for saying I don’t remember than it is to prosecute a clear violation of the Mann Act? There was a reference to Justice department policy about this, maybe it would be a waste of federal tax money to prosecute him. I can understand their not wanting to prosecute someone whose testimony helps them in another case. But having a blanket policy against prosecuting johns is just misguided.
By Elizabeth Bennett on 11/07/2008 12:15 pm