Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Politics | 08/04/2008 11:00 am

Study: Men Happier Than Women Later in Life

By The Staff at wowOwow.com
Couple on bench
© Shutterstock

Women may be happier than men earlier in life as they begin to fulfill their family life and financial goals, but as time goes on, men surpass their better halves on the happiness scale when it comes to money and family.

A new study on life-cycle differences between American men and women by a pair of researchers from Oxford University and USC published in the Journal of Happiness Studies, as reported by Live Science, says aspirations, along with attainments, play an important role in shaping well-being. Early in adult life, women are more likely than men to fulfill their material goods (i.e., big-ticket items like home, car, travel, vacation, etc.) and family-life aspirations, so their satisfaction in these areas is higher, as is their overall happiness. The study also suggested that just because a person has a lot of material items, doesn’t mean they are happier.

The research also found:

-Men’s financial satisfaction exceeds that of a woman at age 41.

-Men’s overall happiness surpasses that of women at age 48.

-Men’s satisfaction with family life exceeds that of women at age 64.

-Men and women had about the same shortfall between their aspirations and attainments for a happy marriage at age 39.

-Women’s satisfaction with family life stayed boosted until about age 64.

-Both men and women believe they need more to be happy as they get older.

Researchers essentially found that happiness and satisfaction with life boils down to the gap between what you really want and what you actually have, and that may vary throughout one’s lifetime.

For example, in their early 20s, about 90 percent of men and women say they want to be happily married. That comes sooner for women, who, on average, marry earlier than men, contributing to higher satisfaction with family life. Children can also help women stay satisfied in life longer, the study said.

"For women, often children are very important and more fulfilling than for men, so that can be something that sustains their satisfaction with family life," said lead researcher Anke Plagnol, a sociologist and economist at the University of Cambridge in England.

 

 

Read more about: Happiness, Health, News, women

32 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Dab-a- do
Women’s satisfaction with family life stayed boosted until about age 64” and “Men’s satisfaction with family life exceeds that of women at age 64.” I am curious. Why is a woman’s satisfaction with family life less than a man’s at age 64? From my own experience, my expectations have been higher than my husband’s expectations. They are living their life and I am not always included. That is the way it should be. I have finally began to understand that my higher expectations had set me up for being disappointed. I now find my life is better by enjoying my own and Jim’s activities and letting my children live their lives. I still am connected and remain available to them during our journey on this earth. My children just don’t define me anymore.
By Dab-a- do on 08/04/2008 10:56 am
Diana T
I always wonder about that old word happy. What is it exactly? And, in the context of this article, does it mean contented, satisfied, in control? Does it mean ha,ha, ha? No, I’m not sure I agree with this contention. The men I know that live alone, have interesting lives and satisfying careers. But, they are also running on emotional empty much of the time. The married men that I know are “happy” if they are having “happy” marriages and their kids aren’t making them crazy. And, is a man “happier” if he retires without any plans or hobbies as to how to fill up his days? No, I’m not sure I agree with this article at all.
By Diana T on 08/04/2008 10:59 am
Frank Peterson
I don’t agree with the results myself, Diana—I should never have retired—I miss the kids too much and the job too much—I fill my days meaningfully but it’s not the same. As for happy—I agree what does it mean?
By Frank Peterson on 08/04/2008 12:10 pm
joan larsen
There is a falllacy in these findings right from the start. For those of us who truly understand, true happiness is something that comes in moments in time. The key word that should have been used for such statements that are so “general” is CONTENTMENT. Contentment - if we look at the word - is kin to SATISFACTION. We like our lot in life. Isn’t that right???? Let’s get real here. Happiness equates to sheer joy. These are moments that stand by themselves, times when we radiate, times when some of us want to - but don’t - jump for joy. Stick with me here. If this state of being was a constant for - let us say - “men over 64” it would quickly become everyday stuff . . . in other words, “contentment”. Happiness comes in those moments when we race to the phone and call our best friend to tell her that the love of her life has proposed and — if this could be arranged - tell her that it was under a sea of palm trees, at the edge of the crystalline blue waters of Bora Bora as the first signs of evening colored the sky gorgeous colors of pink and magenta JUST FOR THEM. Then - at that moment — the heart is racing, the world has never been better, and the sheer joy comes over the phone. That is called HAPPINESS. And that is why happiness is so special. It doesn’t happen every day, for some it doesn’t happen often at all, but for each of us sometime, some place, we can recall these moment that we can pull up in our heads and know we had this happiness. If it was a constant state, we would get used to it and we would not have the flights that have given us such joy. A matter of semantics? So much much more than that. So before we give credence to the authors’ responses to these questions, let’s get the questions themselves right. As the answers stand now, I could argue them all day.
By joan larsen on 08/04/2008 11:06 am
joan larsen
A P.S. Diana, two women writing at the same time — and I think we are smart women who are on the same wave length. Surveys of this sort - no matter the money they cost - deserve to be thrown in the basket and never see the light of day. For women not as bright as we are, it cast clouds over life that probably do not deserve to be there. And that is a crime in itself!
By joan larsen on 08/04/2008 11:14 am
Frank Peterson
Joan you’re right. they surveys do nothing but cloud—dammit—why the hell did I retire? I ask myself that daily.
By Frank Peterson on 08/04/2008 12:12 pm
Diana T
Frank, what was your career? Why do you have to stay retired forever? How long have you been retired? I am not convinced that retirement should occur anyway. The only reason Roosevelt chose 65 for soc.sec. is because, back then, the average life expectancy rate was below that. I know lots of people, myself included, that started all anew after the age of 60. My late husband started his last career at the age of 62 and died at the age of 74 with a full time job. With your obvious talent, there are many directions to take. I always say we never end up where we think we are going to.
By Diana T on 08/04/2008 12:21 pm
Frank Peterson
Diana, I taught kids computer in the TAcoma Public school system—at one school for 26 yrs. I have been considering a new job and I’ll let you know when and if it transpires.—i agree about retirement. It’s getting old lol and I need to work again if not just for the money but because of what i have to offer. Thank you for the encouragement :-)
By Frank Peterson on 08/04/2008 12:36 pm
Diana T
Frank, we weren’t meant to sit around. Piece of advice: How old are you? My Dad, who was a partner in a successful photo-finishing business here, had to retire at 65. All he ever did was work and put his energy into his business. They moved to Florida, whereupon a year and a half later he suffered a massive stroke. Naturally, the stroke was not solely caused by just stopping the work, but, I know for a fact that stress is a contributing factor to most of our disorders that we develop. Besides, interacting with others is just plain more fun. It simply ain’t healthy for men to think about manifesting their talents. My former boss was a fabulous internist, got burned out, retired some years ago, and what does he do now? To the club, play golf, go to the card table, then to the backgammon. And, guess what? He is having TIAs regularly.
By Diana T on 08/04/2008 12:49 pm
Frank Peterson
I’m your age Diana—and I know weren’t meant to sit around—So far I’m healthy as a horse—good genes—mom died at 94—haven’t had a TIA or anything of the kind and no signs yet of it happening—I just get bored—even talking here which helps immensely isn’t the totality of my existence. What I need to do is get off my butt and start substituting—I’d be around kids which frankly keep one young—it’s but a month away from the start of school—think I will go talk with the people in the sub office and get back into the swing of it again. Besides I could use the extra money.
By Frank Peterson on 08/04/2008 12:59 pm
Frank Peterson
Just read this line on a literary blog I post on occasionally, and old adage apparently: most of us die with the music still within. Not this guy, no way! It was in a conversation of Madame de Stael’s novel Delphine, in that the heroine because of her plain looks does not hope for love—and then I thought after reading that: Jane Eyre: “Do you think, because I am poor, obscure, plain and little, I am soulless and heartless? You think wrong! I have as much soul as you, and full as much heart! And if God had gifted me with some beauty, and much wealth, I should have made it as hard for you to leave me, as it is now for me to leave you. I am not talking to you now through the medium of custom, conventionalities, not even of mortal flesh: it is my spirit that addresses your spirit; just as if both had passed through the grave, and we stood at God’s feet, equal – as we are!” De Stael did not let the music out in her portrayal I believe and Bronte was magnificent to put these words into her character —she let the music out. Oh yes.
By Frank Peterson on 08/04/2008 6:37 pm
joan larsen
Frank, it is obvious there is a group of us who would like to say a great deal more privately to you than we are willing to publicly. Rarely, in my own life have I found someone that combines the attributes, the sheer level of intelligence, and so much more that I could list. I don’t like cliches, Frank, but you happen to be - man or woman - one in a million. You probably are ready about now to jump out of your skin as you, too, know it. For you, there never should be the word “retirement” associated with your name. You know that song “I’ve only just begun” — well, if it suits anyone, it suits you. We don’t have to worry about belief in yourself, thank God, as that is so obvious in the variety and intensity at times of your writings. Most people are limited in the number of directions he or she can go toward. That is fact. Not you. Frankly, I find that in circumstances like this, it is far better to talk - brainstorm perhaps - these directions out with a person or persons who have gone the course - and this is the key word - successfully. I find it is no good at all to tell a person to get out there and do something. It can almost pull them into the solace of bed and sleep — and little good comes of that. New directions, new challenges, changes that may amount to a greatness you will not be able to believe are going to be yours, if I were to guess. And frankly, I rarely am wrong. Just a sense I have. In your weeks and months on WOW, you have been able to open windows in the mind for hundreds of people who have been severely hampered by not having a Frank in front of them to converse with. You have been a force here in educating people, making them think as they have not done in years. But this downtime - respite - whatever you want to call it -has only proven to you that you need - for the world and for you - that you have the ability and nature (and how good is THAT!!) and outgoing personality that tells me (us) that you are wasted in boxing the things that make you Frank. You don’t know me, but by now I hope you trust me somewhat. You are just in flux for now. You have tested the waters with us in a most unusual way and come up so far on top that it should give you pause. I am for a new direction, never settling for something that does not set you off on that yellow brick road that so often does not point the path until later in life when you have the wisdom and self-belief to take that shining new road. It is there, waiting for Frank — and you know that the only way that you can begin life’s new course is to get out there and talk - talk a lot - to others that will help in the choices and the final direction. Don’t settle, Frank — YOU don’t have to, you lucky man. If things go as I believe they will, you will end up picking and choosing your direction. But whatever, remember to NOT forget us!!!
By joan larsen on 08/04/2008 1:46 pm
Frank Peterson
Here’s the addy, Joan: frank_peterson@hotmail.com Write anytime you feel like it.
By Frank Peterson on 08/04/2008 1:52 pm
Frank Peterson
Gosh—what can I say—you have to realise that writing here I, this guy, me, have been taught so much by all of you—look what Diana did for me the other day—took me in a direction I didn’t think possible and opened me up —now where else would that happen? Except here—I’ve been lucky, really lucky to be here—and I thank all of you for it.
By Frank Peterson on 08/04/2008 1:57 pm
Gretchen Perkins
Frank, if you are able, you can go back to work and come out of retirement. You can go back to school, upgrade your education, and possibly move to be closer to your family. Stop asking yourself daily why you retired, and start asking yourself what you can do to change your situation!
By Gretchen Perkins on 08/04/2008 10:16 pm