Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Politics | 05/22/2008 11:51 am

The Aftermath of the Cyclone in Burma (Warning: graphic photos)

By Adelle Lutz

wOw Friend’ Adelle Lutz, an artist and Burma activist, reports from Mae Sot, Thailand, on the Thailand/Burma border. The photos below were taken in the Irrawaddy Delta with local cell phones.

I came to Thailand to volunteer in the Cyclone Nargis relief work. Since I arrived in Bangkok, the numbers of Burmese at risk in the aftermath of the disaster has more than doubled. Johns Hopkins Center for Refugee and Disaster Response and the Center for Public Health and Human Rights said 1.5 million and then 2.5 million and is now reporting 3.2 million in jeopardy. At press briefings we are reminded that new information keeps coming out and to bear in mind that "the situation is fluid." How macabre and cruel. Yes, "fluid "is the defining word.

This is what I am learning — picture the Irrawaddy Delta, known as the “rice bowl of Burma,” spreading across the southernmost end of the country. The cyclone hit on May 2nd and devastated 82,000 square kilometers. For 10 hours, winds of 100 miles per hour ripped clothing as sand, debris and salt of the sea beat backs to bloody rawness. Estimates of dead and missing run from 128,000 to 220,000 with the numbers rising daily. Bodies float — not only human but also carcasses of animals. Survivors have patched together shelters from available palm fronds and bamboo.

2008_0522_lutz_children.jpg
Roads in the delta region were never the main avenues of transportation, as most used the waterways. Tributaries and paths would be revealed with the rising and falling of the tides. But the storm brought 12-foot rolling waves, one after the other, surging up to 20 kilometers inland. Fishing and transport boats were carried on top of each other and are now in pieces — pummeled into useless heaps. Gone, too, are most of the little bridges connecting the narrow roads and paths. The bodies float. Trees have toppled and many are submerged, invisible and ready to claw holes into unsuspecting boats that dare to carry meager but necessary relief. The rice is now moldy, the bodies float, the wounds are festering, the young ones have diarrhea, the mothers with newborns cannot produce breast milk, as they themselves have had little if any nourishment, and cholera is reported.

2008_0522_lutz_water.jpg
"Why not move the bodies out of the water?" I wonder. Well, where is it dry? Ah, nowhere. The grounds are saturated and now the rains have hit again and are predicted to drop another 12 centimeters of punishing water in the next five days. The UN spokesperson predicted that these rains will collapse those fragile, life-protecting shelters. But wait — weren’t we told earlier that people were congregating in the monasteries where the floors were more stable even if the roofs had fallen in? Yes. But the situation is fluid. The military has sent them home. What home? There is no home. If people congregate with those conniving monks, they might drum up some plans. And so they must go out into the open air.

Forty percent of the 3.2 million at risk (aka the "second wave") are children. But all are equal in nature’s eyes. That is the one democratic aspect of Burma — nature.

22 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Elizabeth Bennett
There are several nonprofits that have had a presence in Myanmar for many years like the Red Cross, Save the Children and World Vision, according to Oxfam. Also, Unicef, Care and Doctors without Borders are involved in providing aid. Myanmar is letting some relief in, just not much from the U.S. They do not want our helicopters in. The U.N. is negotiating to get more aid in, as 3.2 million lives are at stake. Also, the monasteries in Myanmar have been central in providing shelter to homeless people. One can donate to the monasteries through https://secure.avaaz.org/en/burma_cyclone/
By Elizabeth Bennett on 05/22/2008 6:27 pm
Frank Peterson
Elizabeth: thanks for the info.
By Frank Peterson on 05/22/2008 6:40 pm
Frank Peterson
Myanmar’s junta have allowed aid workers in country finally: http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/05/23/asia/23myanmar-accept.php
By Frank Peterson on 05/23/2008 4:40 am
Elizabeth Bennett
It may be too late for many, but I am glad that progress is finally happening. This is almost as bad as the Tsunami. It had the earmarks of becoming worse than the Tsunami, by keeping so much aid out. Thanks for bringing us up to date.
By Elizabeth Bennett on 05/23/2008 9:40 pm
Ms. Dee
Thank you so much, Ms. Lutz, for not concealing your outrage, nor your straightforward assessment of this crisis. If we feel helpless, think how the Burmese people must feel. Mother Nature is certainly dishing up some monstrously destructive events. I don’t see how another war can save us. Some enormously constructive effort is probably our planet’s best hope, and certainly the only hope of these poor people. Good news, Frank!
By Ms. Dee on 05/23/2008 11:21 pm
Maurine H
Right after the cyclone hit and we became aware of the enormity of the tragedy for the Burmese people, my daughter forwarded me an email from MoveOn.org saying that the Burmese Monks Organization was finding ways to bring in aid. We’ve been contributing through them (Elizabeth has posted the address above https://secure.avaaz.org/en/burma_cyclone/). Sitting at a computer in a warm, dry, comfortable house, I cannot even fathom the suffering in Burma, nor can I believe that a government could deliberately turn its back on its people in the way the junta has. Finally, yes, they are letting aid come in, but so, so late. Those little children -floating in the water- they are the precious babies whose parents, if they are still alive, will never see another day in the same way.
By Maurine H on 05/24/2008 4:03 pm
To the beach ~~~
Many thanks, Adelle, for this. Aung San Suu Kyi was the Prime Minister-elect when the military junta seized power And she might be in power today and the people helped if it were not for Dick Cheney. She is also being threatened right now by the Burma dictators: http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSBKK22059220080611 Watch groups like Multinational Monitor have reported for years that Dick Cheney holds responsibility that she, or another democratically elected leader, are not in power because as the CEO of Halliburton Dick Cheney shored up Burma’s military junta with the construction of the notorious Yadana, Yetagun and Yanta gas pipelines. Despite Halliburton shareholders objections, as CEO Cheney continued it’s corporate support of the military dictatorship—realizing the human rights abuses and that the junta traffics in drugs. Halliburton’s pipeline projects will finance the military regime for decades with hundreds of millions in annual revenue even while the construction and operation of the pipelines involved the use of forced relocation and labor, murder, torture and rape. Further, as CEO Cheney opposed sanctions that would restrict US corporations from financially shoring up dictatorships. Cheney said to Larry King, “You have to operate in countries that are governed in a manner that’s not consistent with our principles here in the United States.” How interesting. Yesterday the Senate Intelligence Committee released it’s 200 page report that Bush/Cheney lied us into war with Iraq to remove dictator Saddam. Even though Saddam was also armed, financed and shored up by earlier Reagan-Bush administrations in which Cheney-Rumsfeld were a part, including being sold the gas that he used on his people. And Cheney’s phony war has enriched him by tens of millions as a Halliburton stockholder. So I’m confused. It was OK for Halliburton to contract with Saddam when he was gassing his people, and with Burma when they were murdering, raping and torturing theirs and forcing them into unpaid labor. But we illegally invaded Iraq to remove a dictator? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IbR3QPcmxFU And here’s Rumsfeld visting Saddam and he made a return friendly visit the day the UN reported that Iraqi troops had gassed Iraqi people. http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/rumsfeld-saddam.jpg
By To the beach ~~~ on 06/11/2008 9:42 pm