Post | 03/07/2008 4:45 pm

The Post Peggy Noonan Finished Exactly Four Minutes Before Samantha Power Resigned

Samantha Power, former advisor to Barack Obama.
AP


The Hillary Clinton camp is demanding that the Obama foreign policy aide, Samantha Power, be fired. Power, of course, gave an intemperate interview to the newspaper, The Scotsman, calling Mrs. Clinton "a monster,” and saying there are, essentially, no depths she will not stoop to.

It looks to me at the moment that this story won’t go away. The Clinton campaign will pump the well until it’s dry, while quietly pouring water in on the side to keep it moist.

And none of this is terrible. It’s politics.

But Samantha Power should not be fired, or forced to resign, or thrown over the side.

She made a mistake. She lost, for a moment, her manners. She apparently knew what she’d done immediately because she told the reporter that what she’d just said was off the record. But for whatever reason or reasons, good or bad, the reporter printed it anyway. When it was printed, a mini-storm erupted. Power apologized. "I should not have made these comments, and I deeply regret them," she said. She damned her quotes as "negative" and "personal.”

And that should be enough. Every staffer in every campaign has just been reminded — again — that it’s dangerous to run off at the mouth. They can’t be reminded enough! Believe me, I know. I was once a campaign staffer.

Power is young, 37. This is her first national campaign. She is hardly unsophisticated — she is a Harvard professor, a former journalist, and a Pulitzer Prize-winning historian — but she made a bush league mistake, a gaffe. In saying this, I use the definition Michael Kinsley popularized: a gaffe, in politics, is the accidental, untimed blurting of a truth.

But, when you work in a campaign and you care about your candidate, you come to harbor dark feelings about the competition. You can call this unprofessional, but you can also call it being human.

Everyone gets a mistake. Power just made hers. She is no doubt mortified. She has embarrassed her candidate and caused him harm. I’m sure she is hitting herself on the head.

Advice for the press: Come to her aid. Your livelihood depends in part on the willingness of people in or near power to tell you what they’re really thinking. Power did just that. Far more important, a healthy democracy benefits from the regular releasing of verbal steam. Democracy benefits from candor. Voters learn from it. In this case we appeared to learn what all of us had previously guessed: the Obama and Clinton camps are full of people who really don’t like each other.

The latest question being bandied about in the Questionsphere is: Is it possible the Democrats will be able to field a strong and winning Clinton-Obama ticket, or an Obama-Clinton ticket? Is it possible both campaigns could come together? What does the Power interview suggest to you about the answer to that question?

(People have been wondering, when they think about the dream ticket, whether it matters that the Clintons are the Hatfields and the Obamas are the McCoys. Does it matter that they don’t like each other? Some people think no. I think yes. It matters a lot. -Presidents work closely with Vice Presidents. They have offices down the hall from each other. Their staffs work in the same complex and meet in the mess together. It is now modern tradition that the President and Vice President have lunch together once a week. It matters that they can operate with trust and respect. It mattered that the Clintons and the Gores really liked each other in 1992, and it mattered — it was news — that the Gores, in the late 1990’s, began to feel a detachment, a disappointment in the Clintons. George W. Bush and Dick Cheney were close. George H.W. Bush liked Dan Quayle a lot. President and Vice Presidents want to get along. Do you want to work closely, intensely, with a partner you dislike?)

Advice to the Clinton campaign: Everyone thinks you’re ruthless, rough and tough. And in going after Power all day Thursday and Friday you showed how ruthless and tough you are. But you don’t really have to show it all the time. It is not endearing. It is not admirable, either. Do some jujitsu. Flip it, surprise your foes; show grace. Say you accept Power’s apology and don’t want to see a young woman lose her job. "There’s been enough job loss in America already." Shock ‘em and show some class.

To the Obama campaign: If Mrs. Clinton’s surrogates and aides succeed in keeping the focus on Power, and it becomes a daily distraction, you may have to ask her to step down. But do it only for the duration of the primary campaign. If you get the nomination, bring her back after her few months in Purgatory. Give her another chance.

Update: I just got the news that Power has resigned. Too bad. Clever on the part of the Obama campaign — they just stopped the next few days of Power debates. And, in the end, a loss to the Clinton campaign. You’re so rough and tough. Thanks. Got the message.

Advice to the JFK School at Harvard: Throw Power a lunch, gather ‘round your professor, invite all the students and debrief her. A two hour Q & A. "What I Learned in the ‘08 Campaign." She’ll have a lot to say. And now she can say it without losing her job.

24 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Mary Wallace
Samantha Power should be on Mt. Rushmore for her book, American and the Age of Genocide. She exposed our terrible underbelly, that we insist on our moral authority to be the leaders of the world but we don’t act ethically to protect humanity. Samantha Power’s book is brilliant, she is a very important voice and the Clintons showed their duplicity in pushing for her removal.
By Mary Wallace on 03/08/2008 7:04 pm
Mary Mooney
Samantha Power was criticizing the Clinton campaign based on what she heard from the ground in Ohio. What I heard from a friend who spent two weeks out there is that the most common objections he heard to voting for Obama were (i) he’s a Muslim, and (ii) he’s African American (I’m sure this is not the term actually used). Both my friend and Power blamed, I think quite fairly, the Clinton campaign, and its “anything to win” attitude, for helping foment and fan this bigotry. Is “Monster” even close to harsh enough to characterize such conduct by allegedly enlightened people ?
By Mary Mooney on 03/08/2008 8:25 pm
Jozie Lee
If both camps are considering a joint ticket she had to go. As you say, president and vice president staff members must get along. If Power is saying those things now it’s possible she’d bring that animosity into the White House, which could undermine both camps. You are so right, Power could teach a lot to future campaigners. Her knowledge and experience should not be lost. A lot of people have said and done stupid things in political circles, and they live to play another day. It’s probably too soon to count her out forever.
By Jozie Lee on 03/08/2008 8:40 pm
Ginger Richardson
Ms. Power worked her tail off for Obama’s campaign for more than a year. She says one irresponsible thing - a mistake, yes, but catastrophic…..hardly - and she’s forced to resign? The woman is a Pulitzer Prize winning author, clearly one of the sharper knives in the drawer. She’ll be fine. I wish her all the best.
By Ginger Richardson on 03/08/2008 9:02 pm
patricia hannigan
The minute one becomes a “public persona / person with authority”, what one says is subject to an entirely new set of consequences. Samantha Powers is brilliant, but slipped up with the comments she made because, in her position of authority and consequence, what she says will be analyzed and taken seriously. This is propitious when what’s said reflects her characteristic brilliance, less so in the case of a lapsus linguae.
By patricia hannigan on 03/08/2008 9:05 pm
sl lambert
Ms. Powers accomplished what she intended…to sell more books.
By sl lambert on 03/08/2008 11:04 pm
Jo MacDonald
Thankyou so much Peggy, for saying what needed to be said. On this issue, both the Clinton campaign and the press coverage have been focussed on the short-term, mountain-out-of-a-molehill perspective - take a breath people. And don’t be blowing everything out of proportion like this on that red phone at 3am!
By Jo MacDonald on 03/09/2008 12:32 am
mitzi morris
Regardless of what side you’re on Samantha Powers is small time. Yes as an intellect, wonk, professor and great writer she gets respect. But the judgement shown by Camp Obama to send out an overwrought amateur and would be diplomat as “foreign policy advisor” is absurd. Power exhibited a typical left wing angry self righteous rage and showed poor judgement in her monster remark, but she also said “we f….d up in Ohio, blah, blah. Her Iraq remarks discredit Obama’s sincerity that he passionately claims about ending Iraq war within 16 months. Samantha in essence was telling the press, “not so fast, it could change you know, and probably will, etc, blah.”. This is not a small mistake. Her passion for Obama doesn’t make her capable of executing responsible foreign policy or diplomacy on any level. She needs to stick to her humanitarian efforts, but please stay away from the press. Peggy Noonan’s point is that of a political pro. But I doubt sincerely that Ms. Noonan would have found her personality or behavior acceptable as someone who apparently lacks discretion, self control, common sense, and tact. Potty mouths don’t make good diplomats. Why should Obama keep her? She’d goof again, or act at best as a reminder of his incompetence re: Canada and NAFTA where it was again, wink,wink, Obama is just talking about NAFTA for the campaign. And, Obama is heard and seen on TV saying it is absolutely untrue,etc. I cannot imagine how anyone is ok with this. He is on a free ride.
By mitzi morris on 03/09/2008 1:18 am
Annie Katz
She’s an educated woman who should have kept her trap shut if she has something impolitic to say that would poorly reflect on her candidate. Telling a journo it’s on “background”? Is she serious? Just more bad judgment from the Obama campaign.
By Annie Katz on 03/09/2008 7:40 am
Annie Katz
P.S. She didn’t speak “the truth.” She said a terrible thing about a woman who has been in the trensches for as long as Power has been alive. Stop making excuses for her abusive behavior. Here’s a topic I’d like to see here: How can we ever forgive our dear friends, especially the women, who have tossed Hillary over for Obama, America’s shiny object?
By Annie Katz on 03/09/2008 7:43 am
Kathy Frazier
What I heard from a friend who spent two weeks [in Ohio] is that the most common objections he heard to voting for Obama were (i) he’s a Muslim, and (ii) he’s African American (I’m sure this is not the term actually used). …blamed, I think quite fairly, the Clinton campaign…for helping foment and fan this bigotry.” A friend spent a whole two weeks in Ohio and blames the Clinton campaign for this bigotry???????? I LIVE in Ohio. The Clinton campaign had nothing to do with it.
By Kathy Frazier on 03/09/2008 12:04 pm
Fran S
I hesitate to do so, but must respond to Ms Katz above. The fact that my genitals are the same as Ms. Clinton’s hardly means I have “tossed Hillary over for Obama.” Is it not the height of misogyny to suggest that one’s gender should be the sole determinant of one’s choices? We may disagree about many things, but please do not suggest that my disagreement with Ms. Clinton’s approach to governance is disloyalty to my gender. It panders to the very essence of what makes her candidacy most polarizing.
By Fran S on 03/09/2008 12:46 pm
Denise Duncan
Powers monster remark was innocuous enough-the real problem was the wink wink about withdrawal from Iraq-makes BO look like he doesn’t mean what he says in stump speech. She is a Harvard prof-old and experienced enough to measure her words-just like BO’s Ivy educated attorney wife and her lack of pride in her country.
By Denise Duncan on 03/09/2008 1:12 pm
meri cadrecha
Seems hoof and mouth disease may be in the soil at Harvard yard. Shades of Larry Summers!Only he was no political newbie.
By meri cadrecha on 03/09/2008 1:30 pm
celeste malott
Looks like Peggy is worried about a Clinton/Obama ticket (does this mean this would be a formidable ticket?). I am a true blue democrat - but I am addicted to Noonan’s weekly WSJ column on Saturday.
By celeste malott on 03/09/2008 1:52 pm