Politics | 02/20/2009 8:40 am
McCain-Linked Lobbyist Vicki Iseman Drops $27M NY Times Suit

Vicki Iseman has dropped her legal war against the New York Times.
The Washington lobbyist with ties to John McCain filed a lawsuit against the paper after the New York Times last February ran a story that Iseman says intimated she and McCain, then a presidential candidate, had been intimate. Iseman sought $27 million in a defamation suit, but settled her suit against the Gray Lady without a penny more to her name.
The Times has consistently stood by its story, which also detailed McCain’s potential conflicts of interest as an ethics reformer. The Times didn’t retract the article either, but it did agree to publish a (very short) Note to Readers, a joint statement by the two parties, and other commentary that stresses that the newspaper never tried to say that Iseman actually had an affair, or any sort of unethical relationship with McCain.
While some say this is a legal win for the Times (not having to pay out $27 million is certainly a victory!), Iseman’s lawyers said in their note, praising the "civilized resolution," that Iseman is a private person, never wanting to be in the spotlight, and that they were attempting to highlight the differences between public versus private individuals. They said:
"We believe passionately, however, in this basic proposition: To abandon, in law or in social convention, the division between public and private life, does not serve to advance the free exchange of ideas, but does coarsen our culture, cheapen our public discourse, and diminish our respect for human dignity."
Politico obtained the staff memo sent to Times writers announcing the settlement, which seems to be claiming victory in the whole ordeal. It says, in part:
We paid no money. We did not apologize. We did not retract one word of the story, which was a compelling chapter in the tale of Senator John McCain and his political rise. The story stands as a powerful examination of a presidential candidate who cast himself as an ethics reformer and scourge of special interests, yet seemed blind at times over the course of his career to appearances of conflicts of interest … We let Ms. Iseman’s lawyers have their say in a commentary on the Web, with a response from Bill Keller. Why? Because that’s what we do. We let people we write about have their say.























49 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
It was not about the money but the malicious way they treated the non story.
The Times is in such fragile financial shape ( in a huge part because of their lack of journalistic standards ) that a huge expensive suit would have likely bankrupted them!
It was flat out "gossip" without any substantiated fact!
That is whey they area standing by their story! It was an insinuation… and would have been difficult to prove in court.
You also cannot get blood from a turnip! Especially one that is drying on the vine as the NYT is! It would be throwing good money down the drain!
The story was about an unethical relationship between McCain and a lobbyist which was hijacked by gossip about an affair. Whether or not there was an affair was not the point.
"Early in Senator John McCain’s first run for the White House eight years ago, waves of anxiety swept through his small circle of advisers.
A female lobbyist had been turning up with him at fund-raisers, visiting his offices and accompanying him on a client’s corporate jet. Convinced the relationship had become romantic, some of his top advisers intervened to protect the candidate from himself — instructing staff members to block the woman’s access, privately warning her away and repeatedly confronting him, several people involved in the campaign said on the condition of anonymity.
When news organizations reported that Mr. McCain had written letters to government regulators on behalf of the lobbyist’s client, the former campaign associates said, some aides feared for a time that attention would fall on her involvement.
Mr. McCain, 71, and the lobbyist, Vicki Iseman, 40, both say they never had a romantic relationship. But to his advisers, even the appearance of a close bond with a lobbyist whose clients often had business before the Senate committee Mr. McCain led threatened the story of redemption and rectitude that defined his political identity.
It had been just a decade since an official favor for a friend with regulatory problems had nearly ended Mr. McCain’s political career by ensnaring him in the Keating Five scandal. In the years that followed, he reinvented himself as the scourge of special interests, a crusader for stricter ethics and campaign finance rules, a man of honor chastened by a brush with shame.
But the concerns about Mr. McCain’s relationship with Ms. Iseman underscored an enduring paradox of his post-Keating career. Even as he has vowed to hold himself to the highest ethical standards, his confidence in his own integrity has sometimes seemed to blind him to potentially embarrassing conflicts of interest." NYT
S.J. You also cannot get blood from a turnip!
That is clearly why the charge was dropped.
Ok so is it fair to say that the Times isnt a very fair newspaper? I dont read them so I can’t really say one way or the other but…I mean some like it when it tends to their cause YET when it goes the other way they are the most hated paper…