Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Politics | 12/10/2008 8:25 am

Virgin Birth More Believable Than Darwin's Theory, Say Americans

By The Staff at wowOwow.com
Virgin Mary holding Baby Jesus © Shutterstock

God may be loving some recent religion-related poll results. A Harris Interactive survey released today shows that more Americans believe in an Almighty presence than in Darwin’s theory of evolution and that the majority of the public believes that the Virgin Mary gave birth to baby Jesus. 

The findings, compiled from 2,126 U.S. adults, included:

— 80% of adult Americans believe in God

— 75% believe in miracles

— 73% believe in heaven

— 71% believe in angels

— 71% believe that Jesus is God or the Son of God

— 70% believe in the resurrection of Jesus

— 62% believe in hell

— 61% believe in virgin birth (Jesus born to Virgin Mary)

— 47% believe in Darwin’s theory of evolution

— 36% believe in UFOs

Did they ask the participants if they believe in Santa Clause?

Click here for more of the poll’s findings.

American’s aren’t the only ones to believe in virgin birth. Another poll out today from theology think-tank group Theos has found that more than a third of Britons believe that the virgin birth of Jesus Christ really happened. In the poll carried out by ComRes on behalf of Theos, 34% of people agreed that the statement "Jesus was born to a virgin called Mary" was historically accurate, while only 32% said they believed it was fictional.

What’s also interesting is women — who experience the agonizing pains of birthing — were more likely to believe in the virgin birth (39%), compared to 29% of men, who just stand in the hospital room sweating.

109 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

marta pont
Good Lord!!! No comments…….
By marta pont on 12/10/2008 8:37 am
gulliver fourmyle
for sure—-if you may search my post, look at the relevant? lotta probs solved—-
By gulliver fourmyle on 12/11/2008 11:29 pm
marta pont
Dear Gulliver, It takes me a while to answer. I just tried to be a bit ironic. Discussing the existence of god is a tall order. I’d leave it to the “pros” (philosophers/theologians/priests of all persuasions, etc) We “civilians” can only approach Divinity from a subjective point of view. Therefore, entering an argument about His/Her existence is a non-issue. Some of the ladies in this forum reminded me of my Mom because she was also a born believer. There was not a single chink in her faith’s shield. Not all of us enter this world with the “blind faith” chip. It is simply not there. Then, we are condemned to a lifelong search. Tha’s why I find eastern religions more to my liking. Buddhists, for instance, don’t deny the existence of god. They just have a different approach & treat “diivinity” as something so great as to be out of human understanding, but the do their best to be the best possible human beings. I’d rather have it their way. In the meantime I continue investigating. These days I’m rereading a very interesting book by Gore Vidal, it’s called “Creation” & another one by a colombian writer . Fernando Vallejo, by the name of “The bitch of Babylonia” -it sounds even worse in Spanish- about the non sequiturs in the Bible & the Coran & assorted historical lies. Very enlightening indeed……..
By marta pont on 12/12/2008 12:11 pm
gulliver fourmyle
well, so far the oldest continuous known ‘belief-system’ remains that of really ancient Southwest Native Americans—-and a very close parallel to Buddhism—-what’s ‘ancient’? as usual opinions differ (gotta keep those grants)—-petroglyph data becomes certain at no less than 10K years—-BP (before the present)—-but some academics feel 50K years more accurate—-long time. it spread throughout North and South America—-even to Huron tribes, etc., in the Canadas—- as with ‘Eastern’ ‘systems’ the same problem arose—-‘if ‘The Great Spirit’—-‘God’—-‘what before?’—-apparently they decided, in a universe of ‘words’, they had to call the great ‘no-thing-as-we-may-know’ something—-‘Nagual’ was their term—-Castaneda cashed in on it, and look at the net—-plenty ‘hoaksters’ are doing fine—- ‘the simple folk’ consider it as a form of ‘witchcraft’—-not a bit—-for instance to many Mexicans it may mean a protective wild-animal’s ‘soul’—-others think the Nagual is a form a human ‘takes-on’, as in the film, ‘The Emerald Forest’, set in the Amazon—-neat film, supposedly based on fact—-most fear it—- it’s a very clever ‘system’ at dealing with the ‘unwordable’—-as it provides incorporation into ‘the objective’ universe—-and may be used to ‘do work’—-if you learn how—-i believe in Jesus, but as most—-an average Christian, Muslim, Sunni, Pentacostal (ouch they are wild), whatever, have used prayer, meditation, etc.—-and seen results—-but sporadic—-‘Nagualism’ has no barriers, and as Buddhism says God is ‘part & parcel of This ‘place’—-but the ultimate ‘entirety’, to a Nagualist is Not incomprehensible—-it may be accessed for ‘Power’—-and unlike God, may be witnessed, used, at will—-kinda like study, practice for years, and Act, reward always follows—-not ‘maybe’. i didn’t believe it—-until i acted, 40 years+ ago—-went ‘hunting-for-power’—-picked a ‘primitive’ Cal state park—-please understand i had ‘intent’—-Nagualism contends ‘intent’ closes a door—-‘belief not required’—-i asked for help—-we went from the smogged LA Valley to the wonderous clean mountains, only weeks later—-in 6 months i had founded my 1st biz—-my innovations persist—-over time, i have seen this deal—- unlike Buddhist, this older bunch sees the universe as a ‘set-point’, and, as many, a bit tyrannical, in an infinite set, gonna get some—-so much of its focus is also on ‘defense’. the idea there is a “You”—-beyond words—-and you’re in ‘deep-do’, as this place, as some, has ‘dazzled you’ to your totality—-you may regain it—-use it—- Bingo!!!!!!!!!!on ‘the faith chip’—-had one—-see very old people happy—-they still have theirs, and no idea of life with its lack—-
By gulliver fourmyle on 12/12/2008 11:40 pm
marta pont
Hey, thanks. You reminded me of Castañeda!!!! I also had my “Nagual” period years ago & have all his books in my library. Now I’m going to do a “full immersion” , guess it might be a good intellectual exercise in this time of turmoil, just to regain some perspective, I mean. Gracias!!!
By marta pont on 12/13/2008 5:12 am
gulliver fourmyle
watch out! only his 1st 3 books are solid—-then he sold-out—-but those Malibu mansions are pricey—-so he started cranking out BS—-i would advise ‘tales of power’ & ‘journey to ixtlan’—-particularly ‘mind-wrenching’ is the ‘tales of power’ data on ‘the islands of the tonal’—- his writing is superb—-many feel his Ph.D should have been ‘creative-writing’, not anthropology—-none-the less, some major ‘truths’ seem to be found—- probably the most important book (i am opinionated!) of the 20th century is an old Brit chum’s ‘The Presence of the Past’—-Rupert Sheldrake—-once a laughing-stock, as Wegener on ‘plate-tectonics’—-not many laughing now—-And he is the only man ‘The Great Randy’ (master de-bunkers of BS), the only man Randy ever apologized—-have fun!
By gulliver fourmyle on 12/13/2008 6:56 pm
marta pont
Dear G, Yes, you are!!!! I mean, opinionated, you most definitely . But, then again, who cares?? Your advice is sound. I agree about Castañeda books. I did my Sheldrake in time but you got me with the Randy BS debunker, who is he??? Dawkins I know well but Randy mystified little me. PLs adv. Tks,
By marta pont on 12/15/2008 8:39 am
gulliver fourmyle
he’s the Greatest de-bunker of BS—-
By gulliver fourmyle on 12/15/2008 5:13 pm
gulliver fourmyle
wiki james randi—-sorry for the confusion—-
By gulliver fourmyle on 12/15/2008 5:24 pm
gulliver fourmyle
Rupert, as most, are hardly flawless—-yet the numerous anomalies (‘space-probe’, ‘stars older than the universe’, ‘Mercury’s orbital changes’, and others) certainly fall within his predictions of a ‘non-static laws-of-nature’—-to singly revive Lamarck is a monumental ‘score’. i always read as an editor, and TPOTP comes thru scrutiny splendidly—-the others? ‘Pets and Their Owners’ is, according to pet-owners i know, another bit of solid work—-it is very important to view Any ‘science-work’, as writing, as a ‘battle’ vs. an established ‘elite’, often composed of idiots far more concerned with their academic position vs. truth—-as my reference to Plate Tectonics—-who would think it heresy until 1962? furthermore, as a young, published for pay poet, my brief mentor, Oscar Williams warned me—-‘The better you are, the more you will become a target. It’s you and a pack of wolves.’ academia has been such, so i don’t mess with them—-useless—-does Dawkins and his ‘selfish-genes’ concept wish to die? no—-so he’ll bust his butt promoting bunk—-his ‘meal-ticket’—- on another track, as an editor, if you go through The New Testament—-i found a remarkable bit—-you may replace every mention by Jesus (i intuit a ‘visitor from our future), every mention of his words fits perfectly—-if you edit and replace ‘father’ with ‘future’—-considering the sheer # of matches is hard to refute—-eccentric? perhaps—-
By gulliver fourmyle on 12/15/2008 7:44 pm
marta pont
Checked up the Randi stuff, will look into it later on. Tks for the info. And yr take on Jesus words might lead into something interesting??’ Who knows…..
By marta pont on 12/16/2008 6:13 am
gulliver fourmyle
being raised by nutzo religios made me very leery of the Bible—-but on a trip we stayed a few days in a beachside Santa Barbara motel—-yep the Gideons had proceeded me—-so i took a look—-what i saw was if one ‘stuck’ to the words of Jesus, tossing the bunk, made plenty of sense—-for instance, he never said he was the ‘son-of-god’, rather ‘the son-of-man’—-as an amateur astronomer, space-cowboy, i was very interested the the Xmas star bit—-as the Arabians were the main ‘saviours’ of Greek math—-trig, etc. we’ve all been fed the ‘3-wise-men’ deal—-actually seems it was 2 wise men (an arabic synonym for ‘astronomer), on horses—-so they note a ‘new star’ rising n the east, and using trig could triangulate a ‘geo-stationary’ object as above ‘the city of the manger’—-that’s interesting. as Jesus’ words, ‘I am not of this world.’ a good editor will find many instances reflecting this person was real, probably from our distant future via ‘time-ship’, 2000 years is not a long-span—-so i feel some of the data as accurate—-
By gulliver fourmyle on 12/17/2008 12:02 am
Ms. Dee
Fascinating, really. This would imply that irrational forces may have been at work in the election of our next U.S. President. You know, people may be crooked, but at least that’s rational. Honesty is such a Utopian ideal. At least the questions were about belief and not knowledge. The irony of the entire exercise is it’s attempt to statistically measure, and therefore KNOW, what people in America truly believe in. Beliefs are always delusional, the evidence of things hoped for, but they create our world. And then, science measures reality and tells us just what we’ve done. I don’t mean to discredit statistical measurements, but we could all use a little more interpretive skill when it comes to surveys like these. So I hope everybody will go to the Harris Poll page. It tells you exactly how they chose the 2,000+ participants in the survey. And it is a fairly representataive sample. So…All Merry Men Rejoice….America is still a Christian nation! Despite its myriad manifestations. We want to believe that there is a greater purpose. That there are people worth dying for. We want to know. And so we believe with all our hearts. There’s really no rational reason to believe we can’t dwell in peace. I think it’s fairly good news.
By Ms. Dee on 12/10/2008 9:08 am
HA BIBI
Well known fact that on Darwin’s death bed he admitted to there being a God!
By HA BIBI on 12/10/2008 10:05 am
f p
You well-known fact doesn’t hold water i’m afraid. This is what actually happened on his death bed: At his bedside, and attending to his needs, were his wife Emma, his daughter Henrietta and his son Francis. A widespread rumor circulated — facilitated by an evangelist by the name of Lady Hope who preached in Downe during the last years of Darwins life — that on his deathbed Darwin renounced evolution and declared himself a Christian. This story, totally contradictory to the nature of the man himself, is a falsehood, denied by his daughter Henrietta and those who knew him best and who were actually at his bedside during his last weeks. Darwin’s last words, spoken to his wife Emma, were in actuality, “I am not in the least afraid to die.”
By f p on 12/10/2008 10:24 am