02/23/2009 10:50 am

POV

War Widows Strain Iraq's Social Services

© Shutterstock

While some women are thriving in post-war Iraq, countless others suffer in silence.

It’s impossible to know how many war widows populate the nation these days, but the numbers are so large that Iraq’s social services are feeling the strain. Leila Kadim, who manages the Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs, lamented to the New York Times: "We can not help everybody. There are too many." Only one in six war widows receive aid from the government.

Not only are women turning to begging and prostitution to get by, but many are finding haven among insurgents and offering themselves as suicide bombers. Still others are embarking on so-called "temporary marriages" with men who provide for them and their children. The Times explains: "Officials at social service agencies tell of widows coerced into “temporary marriages” — relationships sanctioned by Shiite tradition, often based on sex, which can last from an hour to years — to get financial help from government, religious or tribal leaders." The state, too, has been getting involved in such schemes.

Baghdad Displacement Committee, a city agency, pays men to marry war widows, a plan that highlights some officials’ less-than-helpful sentiments. Said director Mazin al-Shihan:

If we give the money to the widows, they will spend it unwisely because they are uneducated and they don’t know about budgeting. But if we find her a husband, there will be a person in charge of her and her children for the rest of their lives. This is according to our tradition and our laws.

No wonder the state’s not doing enough for women…

58 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

fp1
Let Georgie pay ‘em—after all he’s the one who caused it all.
By fp1 on 02/23/2009 10:56 am
BelindaJoy
I often wondered about the hundreds of thousands of Iraqi soldiers that were killed and what happened to their families? I guess now I know. How sad. But I guess I shouldn’t feel too sorry for them because after all they died for the same reason our soldiers died, in the name of democracy…..right? Isn’t that what the Bush administration and Republicans want us to believe?
By BelindaJoy on 02/23/2009 11:05 am
cajp

We still like to think we have "won or winning" the war in Iraq and here we see how much of a mess there still is over there with these poor widows who are suffering now.  I wonder how these women would be getting on with their lives if we had not invaded that country to start with, all those who voted for this unnecessary war will have a lot to answer for years to come.

By cajp on 02/23/2009 11:07 am
AnitaPimmel

I’m sure life in Saddam’s rape rooms was just peachy.

What happened to the german widows after WW2?

Iraq was being run by animals. There is a lot of humanitain work to do. If the liberals had there way we would have left them to their own devices years ago.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2003/jul/23/iraq.suzannegoldenberg

By AnitaPimmel on 02/23/2009 7:28 pm
cajp
Did you even know anything about Iraq before we invaded it or did your info only come after  the Bush admin scared us all into thinking we had to go to war??  There are a lot of countries around the world that are run by horrible people and we don’t invade them all do we??  Boy, you folks sure are brain washed through and through by the good old Bush doctrine…if he had said you all had to jump off a cliff you would all have gladly done so.  The war with Germany was a legitimate one and the one with Iraq was not there is a world of difference, those women in Iraq would not have half as many husbands lost if we had not invaded that country.
By cajp on 02/23/2009 11:12 pm
DeBrcaobj

Like the man said when he threw his shoes at King George, "This is for all the widows, the orphans and those who were killed in Iraq."

Add to that the Americans who have died and been wounded there and the $billions spent and disappeared there, all for a lie, and you have the Bush legacy. 

By DeBrcaobj on 02/23/2009 12:00 pm
RogerfromOhio

…and the $billions spent and disappeared there, all for a lie

Almost $3 Trillion now DeBurca 

By RogerfromOhio on 02/23/2009 2:27 pm
CatherineKaiman
Wow, what a waste. 
By CatherineKaiman on 02/23/2009 3:35 pm
DeBrcaobj
$3 Trillion wasted in an unnecessary war… and people are worried about spending money in this country for infrastructure.
By DeBrcaobj on 02/23/2009 6:17 pm
RogerfromOhio

It seems pretty basic and simple to me….

Spend money on America and the American people… good

Spend money on war and killing ….. bad

What is the part that Im missing? 

By RogerfromOhio on 02/23/2009 6:43 pm
AnitaPimmel

When is Obama going to get us out of Iraq?

Don’t bet too much money on that one.

He’s sending more troops there and Afganistan!

He’s killing thousands of women and children!

Oh the humanity!

What about Gitmo?

What about Halliburton?

.

By AnitaPimmel on 02/23/2009 7:33 pm
CatherineKaiman

Why did Bush launch a bogus war in Iraq?

How many innocent men, women and children have been killed because of Bush’s bogus war?

Obama should send more troops to Afghanistan, and deal with the Taliban and finish the hunt for Bin Laden, you remember him right? The tall skinny ugly dude that orchestrated the 9/11 attacks, the guy that Bush let get away, and didn’t think about anymore.

What about Gitmo?  How many ppl there are not or should I say weren’t terrorists before being sent there?  How many new terrorists did Bush create by torturing ppl that may infact be innocent?

Halliburton, is owned by a swindler that can’t operate a shot gun and shoots his own friends.

By CatherineKaiman on 02/24/2009 2:02 am
TP1

Catherine-

Let’s talk about Bill Clinton shall we and how he could of stopped Bin Laden during HIS watch.

Do your research on Gitmo Catherine and ask yourself "Would I feel safe if they were released in my neck of the woods?"

I think Obama did send troops to Afghanistan quite recently maybe he was instructed by Bush to do so and it was in USA Today.

How many American people were killed in 9/11?  Do you care about the hell that they went thru? And they certainly didn’t ask for it now did they Catherine.

 

  

 

By TP1 on 02/24/2009 3:05 am
cajp
Yes, and how many many more have been killed in Iraq a country that had nothing to do with 911..a little fact that is well known now.  Folks keep harping on about 911 because that was the Bush administrations mantra for years and their only excuse for going to war with Iraq!!  What about the hell we have caused in Iraq these past several years all because Cheney, him being Bush’s brain was hell bent on going to Iraq regardless you think about that.
By cajp on 02/24/2009 8:26 am
CatherineKaiman

Tanja, don’t even begin to question my concern over the 9/11 victims and the hell they went thru and the hell that their families are still going thru.

I don’t dispute Clinton may have dropped the ball when it came to Bin Laden, however, the attack happened on Bush’s watch, and it was Bush that dropped the ball in Afghanistan and the hunt for Bin Laden. 

Obama, is correct in sending more troops to Afghanistan, however I hardly think Bush had anything to do with that, afterall he stopped thinking about Bin Laden a long time ago.

I have done my research on Gitmo Tanja, thank you very much.  It is not so much Gitmo that I am opposed to as it is the violation of human rights that takes place there ie: torture.

Of course you didn’t answer my question, not surprisingly, so I’ll ask again.  How many innocent ppl were sent to Gitmo, and tortured that had nothing to do with terrorisim?  How many new terrorists have been created by such treatment?

Btw Tanja, it wasn’t just American ppl killed on 9/11, it wasn’t just an American tragedy.

By CatherineKaiman on 02/24/2009 9:29 am