Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Caroline Kennedy Candidacy Watch | 01/26/2009 10:45 am

Did Paterson Cause Kennedy's Downfall?

By The Staff at wowOwow
© AP

In this series, which started in July ‘08, wowOwow follows the political news swirling around Caroline Kennedy since her surprise endorsement of Barack Obama and high-profile placement on his VP selection committee. Now, Caroline is ready to launch a political career of her own. With the Caroline Kennedy Candidacy Watch, we’ll follow all the latest news.

Gov. David Paterson may have let a number of people down during his selection of someone to replace Hillary Clinton’s Senate seat. Not least of all is Caroline Kennedy, who dropped out of the race approximately 24 hours before he announced his decision.

Paterson said Kennedy’s decision was her own, but still won’t say whether he would have picked her had she stayed in the race. "She had gotten no signal from me that she had to withdraw, and no signal from me that she wouldn’t be selected," he said. "The reality is that she is a great New Yorker, a great friend of mine, and there was nothing that would have prohibited her from serving."

New York Magazine says that Paterson’s delay in announcing his pick was a big contributor to Kennedy’s downward spiral of public opinion. Just to add to the confusion, some also are saying that he was telling different contenders that they were his top pick.

"If he would have named someone early on, people would have gotten behind it," one state political strategist told the magazine midway through the saga. "Instead, not only didn’t he pick someone, he went in reverse — he told [American Federation of Teachers President] Randi Weingarten maybe she should be senator. He meets with [former four-term Watergate-era Brooklyn congresswoman] Liz Holtzman, who actually thinks she can be a senator now. So now people have to rip the front-runner. Because in this campaign, you can’t be seen as openly promoting yourself, so all you can do is the negative part, making sure your surrogates, or unnamed sources, are ripping the sh*t out of the other people."

Kennedy’s people were reportedly enraged by Paterson when he still hadn’t named her by Christmas, and as media reports became more negative. But how much did Kennedy really want the job anyway? The February 2 issue of The New Yorker says that just before Christmas, Kennedy was panicky when asked about going to the Senate:

Even before things started to go sour, in other words, she was apprehensive about what lay ahead. Then, a week or two later, after the tabloids and the upstate papers had at her, she attended another friend’s birthday party and looked as though she’d just disembarked from a very steep and terrifying roller coaster: shaken, startled, roughed up."

So what’s Kennedy doing now? She’s telling friends she won’t leave the public sphere entirely. There are, of course, rumors that she could get some kind of federal appointment, given her close relationship to President Obama. She’d probably like some time to recover from this rough ‘n’ tumble non-campaign. But we know we’ll hear more from her again soon!

28 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

f p
Paterson had a nice little soap opera going and he handled it badly—very stupid of him but no I don’t think he was the main reason—just an ancillary idiot on the public dole.
By f p on 01/26/2009 10:52 am
Belinda Joy
Paterson’s camp did not handle anything about the appointment of the vacant senate seat correctly and in the end I believe he will be the one left embarrassed with questions to answer for, and not Caroline. As I heard a commentator say this morning, “He” needs to look at how he became Governor. If he were to have to run tomorrow, would he be elected? Probably not.
By Belinda Joy on 01/26/2009 10:53 am
DeBúrca obj
This may be flip side of the sexism coin… but when a man comes across as being less than gallant… as Paterson has in this case, the woman will prevail. No matter what the facts of the situation are concerning Caroline Kennedy… the leaks and nasty rumors coming out of Paterson’s administration targeting Kennedy, will stick to him more than to her. Mark my words.
By DeBúrca obj on 01/26/2009 10:54 am
rocky rocky
Where’s the problem? At the beginning Paterson said he would not announce his selection until Hillary was confirmed and that he would not be forced by anyone to announce sooner — and he kept his word. All the brou-ha-ha since the beginning has been caused by the press running amok with wild predictions and unsupported hypotheses and so-called candidates publicly “running” for the job even though Paterson asked them not to do so. So why all the anger against Paterson? Geez.
By rocky rocky on 01/26/2009 11:04 am
Cheryl Mitchell
I completely agree with you rocky!
By Cheryl Mitchell on 01/26/2009 1:16 pm
Lori F.
Patterson showed courage and responsibility, do we actually expect a liberal to understand that? C. Kennedy was so overrated and done!
By Lori F. on 01/27/2009 6:39 am
f p
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA He’s a typical pol jerkoid.
By f p on 01/27/2009 8:42 am
Brooklyn Gal
Caroline has to bear responsibility for the way she campaigned during this process, but in the end, Paterson should come out the loser. First he gave a State of the State address that was over an hour but had said nothing of substance. Then his selection process became a circus, and he used Caroline to keep the story alive so he wouldn’t (as he joked to reporters) have to answer questions about the economy. But the worst thing he did was allow the disparaging leaks and untruths about Caroline. When a Cuomo aid was asked if Cuomo will be attending the Gillibrand announcement, he replied that the AG will be busy reorganizing his sock drawer. (NY Magazine)
By Brooklyn Gal on 01/26/2009 11:10 am
Lee Harrison
As Rocky says above, there wasn’t a seat to fill until HRC was approved for her position in the State Department. Kennedy’s lame campaign aside, Patterson seemed to intentionally add unnecessary drama and innuendo to the situation. There has to be a reason. I’ve picked up a few tidbits from various news sources and if I put them together, this is what I come up with as a possibility. Gillibrand is HRC’s choice for her Senate seat. I believe Gillibrand worked on Hill’s campaign. I’m sure Hill did not want Kennedy, since she endorsed Obama. Rahm Emanuel has a connection to Gillibrand, if the report that he recruited her for Congress a few years ago is fact. I think it’s possible that these powerful Democrats orchestrated the rumors about Kennedy and maybe encouraged Patterson to keep up the histrionics and delays. Kennedy either played right into their hands or has been promised something else. This is not something I’ve read or heard from any source…this is just my suspicious mind at work…so don’t put too much stock in it.
By Lee Harrison on 01/26/2009 11:36 am
Lily Rose
As Rocky said, “at the beginning Paterson said he would not announce his selection until Hillary was confirmed and that he would not be forced by anyone to announce sooner — and he kept his word.” New York Magazine’s opinion that Paterson’s delay in announcing his pick was a big contributor to Kennedy’s downward spiral of public opinion indicates that it was unaware of his timeline, or blamed the fact that he had a timeline as a cause of Kennedy’s “downward spiral”; either being journalistically questionable.
By Lily Rose on 01/26/2009 11:39 am
Diana T
Who knows, I think it was poorly handled and now, it appears as though there is a movement for Cuomo to run for governor in ‘10. Paterson’s problem is that he gave the impression that he is indecisive. That is not what people want at this time—they want Real Leaders. Time will tell….
By Diana T on 01/26/2009 12:18 pm
Patty E
So much has happened in a short amount of time…thanks to Lee, I now remember that I forgot… Hillary did NOT want Caroline in the position to begin with? Remember how ‘nasty’ things were right from the start? on the Caroline possibility? Mud was-a slinging! Thankfully, many remember that Paterson stated at the outset, that he would not replace Hillary UNTIL she was confirmed—-there was no seat AVAILABLE until Hillary was confirmed..duh! Translated—Paterson had every right to appoint NO ONE, until Hillary resigned. Paterson may not have done things the way many would have done them—-but that doesn;t mean that he wasn;t right, in the way he did it…..It is not difficult to see, that the slingshots aimed at him, are being fed the stones, from those who needed a scapegoat, while the manipulations of the ‘political ways’ marched onward.
By Patty E on 01/26/2009 12:48 pm
Cheryl Mitchell
Amen to that Patty!
By Cheryl Mitchell on 01/26/2009 1:19 pm
%$#@* !@&*^!!
Caroline handled the entire thing incredibly badly. Patterson, thus far, has proven to be a total schumk. He didn’t appoint Cuomo, the better candidate, because it wasn’t in HIS best interests politically. Spitzer…why the hell didn’t you keep it in your pants? He WAS competent and very effective. But he wan poltically hit in his known vulnerable place….because he was so arrogant about going after Wall St financial criminals, and in warning us about the economic tsunami to come. They wanted to take him down, shut him up. I was always suprised he didn’t have an ‘accident.’ Talk about hoisted up on your own petard.
By %$#@* !@&*^!! on 01/26/2009 1:36 pm
Lori F.
Since when any politician does what best for the people’s interests?
By Lori F. on 01/27/2009 6:42 am