Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Politics | 05/09/2008 8:36 am

What Killed Microsoft’s Bid for Yahoo? Testosterone

By Liz Peek
© Landov

Bears, Bulls, Chickens and Pigs: wOw’s Wall Street Weekly With Liz Peek (Week of 5/04)

EDITOR’S NOTE: Liz Peek is a financial columnist.

Americans celebrated spring this year by … shopping, of course – what else?

April retail sales were better than expected for a number of stores, well ahead of the much-awaited rebate checks. What does it mean? It’s hard to say. Easter came very early this year, which may have distorted comparisons, and in the Northeast, at least, good weather came late, dampening the urge to spruce up the spring wardrobe. Not surprisingly, given the tenor of the times, companies like WalMart and Costco continued to outperform higher-priced stores like J.C. Penney. Wholesale clubs racked up a 9% gain in same-store sales, while retailers overall enjoyed a moderate 3.6%. There is no doubt that people are trading down.

It worries me that some of the bounce in club sales could represent people trying to buy and horde food. We have seen in the past that just hinting about a shortage tends to create one. News accounts about soaring grain prices may have led homemakers to pile up cereals and other products before prices rise. I haven’t seen this mentioned anywhere, but it is a possibility.

A more positive take on the retail numbers might be that people aren’t feeling quite so dismal. According to the barbershop quartet of Street CEOs I mentioned last week, the worst of the credit crunch is behind us. The atmosphere on the Street is definitely calmer, and the stock market has bounced 9% off its March lows.

Also, the retail numbers aren’t the only economic reports that have been better than expected. Unemployment claims have remained consistent with a slowly growing economy, and another relative bright spot was the 2.2% productivity gain reported for April. Productivity growth is usually tough to come by this far into an economic expansion, but remains essential to corporate profitability.

Here’s my last word on the consumer: I heard one of the country’s most successful hedge fund managers speak off the record yesterday. He echoed the concern that spending will remain constrained by the amount of debt on consumers’ balance sheets. As he said, over the past decade Americans borrowed against the equity in their homes; this huge monetization of home equity is viewed as a one-time event. Seeming to rebut that notion were the April gains in both home equity borrowings and consumer installment credit. Together, according to Wall Street’s favorite ISI economists, debt in these two categories amounts to $3.1 trillion, up almost $200 billion year over year. As ISI points out, the jump could represent a slowdown in payments. This would not be good news.

Also occupying the pundits on Wall Street this week was the death of Microsoft’s takeover of Yahoo. I found this nearly comical – probably because I’m not a Yahoo shareholder. So here’s Microsoft making a bold preemptive $31 bid for Yahoo at a (huge) 62% premium, and telling the world how crucial the combination is to its future growth. Jerry Yang, CEO and co-founder of Yahoo, balks at the price, demands $37 — and Microsoft ups their bid, orally, to $33. Yahoo still balks, so Microsoft walks away. Have these guys never bought a house, for heavens’ sake? Don’t they understand give and take?

Afterwards, both parties tried to blame the other for the collapse of negotiations. I blame too much testosterone. I mean really – if the deal was so great at $33, wasn’t it almost as great at $34? Some folks think it was a ridiculous bid in the first place and that Microsoft came to its senses. I doubt it. The next target of the company’s affections may turn out to be Facebook, for which they would have to pay a completely-crazy-dotcom-era price. At the end, the collapse of the deal disappointed investors, who are hoping a renewed stream of takeovers will boost stock prices.

The other gorilla in the room continues to be the endless rise in oil prices, which are around $125 per barrel this morning. I keep thinking (wrongly) that we’ll get a break here soon, but supply concerns for the moment are uppermost. The bad news this week was that in spite of weakening economies, the Bank of England and the European Central Bank held interest rates firm. They are concerned about inflation, but might consider that a cut in Eurozone rates would work wonders for the dollar, and might put a lid on oil prices.

Americans are responding to the rise in gas prices by changing driving habits and buying more fuel-efficient cars. The real question is where they will go for their summer vacations. Europe is outrageously expensive, airline ticket prices have followed jet fuel higher and they can’t afford to drive. What’s the last stop on the subway? Or, for the non-city dwellers, do you still have that old bicycle in the garage?

15 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

sherman amsel
testosterone” killed the deal? please, liz. it might have been that microsoft and yahoo just couldn’t agree on on what yahoo was worth. and, who are we to tell others what they think their own property is worth? business deals have alot to do with money, as you well know, and lack of agreement can only be equated excess testosterone if you reduce men to one-sided, single-minded robots who are not capable of coming to any agreement at all, because we’re so stupid and driven by our penises. how would you like it if i said “perhaps you have PMS today; that explains why you blame a failed business deal on too much testosterone”. wouldn’t that reduce you to a mere bag of hormones? that’s about how i felt reading that portion of your otherwise very fine writing.
By sherman amsel on 05/09/2008 10:08 am
K O
Hi Sherman, Your argument is flawed - an “all or nothing” dichotomy is not what Liz hypothesized. Anyone who has observed the aggressive business tactics employed by Microsoft’s two highest level executives - Bill Gates and Jeffrey Balmer - knows they are very tough negotiators. And Yang’s assertion that Yahoo is worth $37/share was judged by the market - trading it down to $24 after Microsoft walked away. Would bravado be a more acceptable word to you? If so, use that instead of testosterone, and know that a woman who is a tough negotiator is called a “bitch” in popular vernacular. “PMS” is the description given by men who are presented an opinion with which they don’t agree.
By K O on 05/09/2008 12:58 pm
Ken Jarvis
The ONLY was MSoft negotiates is TAKE IT OR LEAVE IT. MSoft has a Monopoly on EVERY WINDOWS BASED CPUTER IN THE WORLD. In The World. Windows Based CPuters can’t run without MS, but ALL can run without Y or G.
By Ken Jarvis on 05/11/2008 8:13 am
Ken Jarvis
MSoft doesn’t NEED Yahoo. MSoft wants to get rid of Yahoo and Google. MSoft can and does BLOCK certians Y & G programs from running on YOUR Windows based computer. This will probably increase. Y & G are Ad Revenue based - THAT is how the make $$$ Fewer and Fewer Windows based Cputers will run anything Y or G, as Advertisers discover fewer and fewer Windows Bases CPuters are able to run Y & G stuff. Ads will dry up. When Ads dru up - Y & G Die. LVKen7 at Gmail dot com
By Ken Jarvis on 05/11/2008 8:10 am
Tinka Parker
So great to have your insights. I still think - if you’ll allow a bit of New Age intuition - that America has a big lesson underway regarding oil and that the markets will continue to be held hostage to oil prices until Americans enter the 12-step program. Fortunately we have a leader on the way who is capable of inspiring people to make hard sacrifices. We haven’t had that in a really long time.
By Tinka Parker on 05/09/2008 11:59 am
Frank Peterson
Microsoft’s arrogance? I loathe their products even as I’m forced to use them.
By Frank Peterson on 05/09/2008 12:43 pm
Carolyn K
Rather than testosterone, it could well have been a clever strategy by Jerry Yang to get Microsoft to walk away. After all this was a hostile take over by Microsoft after having been spurned once before by Yahoo.
By Carolyn K on 05/09/2008 1:06 pm
Frank Peterson
Lily—leave a very old hamster to run the place roflmao—nice turn of phrase, m’dear :-)
By Frank Peterson on 05/09/2008 1:43 pm
Maggi D
Testosterone, PMS, it doesn’t matter. In my humble opinion it was greed on both parts.
By Maggi D on 05/09/2008 2:55 pm
Dr. Mark Klein
The real economic story is we’re in for a very prolonged period of 1970s style stagflation.
By Dr. Mark Klein on 05/10/2008 10:18 am
K O
Ridiculous. 1970’s stagflation was a combination of rising wages and prices. Prices, as measured by CPI, are tame, as is wage growth. I put this in the category of the poster who recommended buying Euro based mutual funds just as the dollar began to rise. Such pronouncements are without basis, without merit, and run the danger that, if a reader follows the advice, she will lose money.
By K O on 05/14/2008 2:07 pm
RoseMerry Hoffman
I hope that it is only that bad. But i fear the population bomb is abound to go non-linear and resource wars and food riots will spread and escalate. I fear gigadeath is on the horizon. Just a matter of when.
By RoseMerry Hoffman on 05/17/2008 3:53 pm
RoseMerry Hoffman
I was a contractor at IBM Austin when Microsoft and IBM were trying to work together on a new operating system….OS/2. I only was an eye-witness to IBM’s side but I could that there was testosterone in the air, all around. Now, IBM is has many female mid-level managers but the most successf are oh so butch and in IBM jargon, “Have had their lobotomy” (being to IBM manager class) just like the boys and the boys rule all of the top positions. It was insane to think that these two could work together. And guess how won. Have you even HEARD of OS/2? Or eComStation? (the successor who lives mostly in Europe today). And if you can even find a new IBM computer (but no monitor or printer or laptop), guess what operating system it comes it? Yes, Linux is an opinion. Yeah, right
By RoseMerry Hoffman on 05/17/2008 4:04 pm