Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Caroline Kennedy Candidacy Watch | 01/06/2009 11:00 am

What's It Like to Campaign in Caroline Kennedy's Shadow?

By The Staff at wowOwow.com
© AP

In this series, which started in July ‘08, wowOwow follows the political news swirling around Caroline Kennedy since her surprise endorsement of Barack Obama and high-profile placement on his VP selection committee. Now, Caroline is ready to launch a political career of her own. With the Caroline Kennedy Candidacy Watch, we’ll follow all the latest news.

What’s it like to compete with a Kennedy? They’ve got the money, the name, the political pull. Some of them even have the looks. Then there’s that whole Camelot thing …

Put it all together and what do you have? A steep, uphill climb for anyone running against a Kennedy for, well, anything. Caroline Kennedy’s no exception.

Although Rep. Carolyn Maloney has been traveling throughout the Empire State meeting with local party leaders and voters, trying to convince them she’s the right person to fill Hillary Clinton’s Senate seat, we don’t hear too much about her, thanks to the media frenzy surrounding Kennedy. Also left in the winter cold is Rep. Steve Israel, D-NY, who is conducting a non-campaign for the seat. Both say it’s completely up to Gov. David Paterson to pick Clinton’s replacement, but they sure would like the job.

"Look, she’s Caroline Kennedy," Israel told The New York Times during a stop in Utica. "And it doesn’t bother me, dissuade me or affect me in the least."

On Monday, after a visit to Rochester, Maloney tried to turn her name non-recognition into an asset.

"If this is a celebrity beauty contest, I am not going to win," Maloney said. "But if people want to look at someone’s record and their service and their work to help people, I think I have a chance."

Maloney told The Hill that she traveled upstate over the weekend to "learn more about the challenges" and to answer the questions of voters there.

"I gained more of an understanding of what’s on people’s minds so that, if I were appointed, I would be better able to hit the ground running," Maloney said. "I heard a great deal about jobs, jobs and jobs."

Meanwhile, it’s pop quiz time for the contenders! The New York Times says Paterson has told Kennedy, Maloney, Israel, Rep. Kirsten Gillibrand, Rep. Jerrold Nadler and Nassau County executive Thomas Suozzi to fill out a 28-page questionnaire, which includes questions about their finances, job history and criminal records – if there are any. 

Kennedy came under some criticism recently when she wouldn’t disclose to the press details about her finances (which she is under no obligation to do right now).

But wait — the battle of the other five Senate hopefuls may not be as hard as they thought. A new poll out this week shows that Kennedy’s popularity has taken a "major hit" since she first threw her hat into the ring. Given the choice between Kennedy and Attorney General Andrew Cuomo, 58 percent prefer Cuomo to 27 percent for Kennedy. 

"When Caroline Kennedy was first mentioned as a possible Senate appointee there was a lot of enthusiasm among New York Democrats about her," said Dean Debnam, President of Public Policy Polling. "Her reputation has taken a pretty clear hit over the last month, and if Gov. Paterson does end up appointing her she’s going to have some work to do to overcome this bad first impression she’s made on New York voters." Looks like the tide is turning in the popularity portion of the games, anyway.

30 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

S.J. Morgan
Latest poll for Cuomo shows him way ahead of Mrs. Slossberg
By S.J. Morgan on 01/06/2009 10:29 am
Brooklyn Gal
I don’t trust polls because people tend to answer on well-recognized names. I am surprised Jerry Nadler is in this mix. Another non-entity in NY Politics. And I am not a fan of Cuomo or that dynasty. The more I read about Gillibrand, the more I like. Congresswoman Gillibrand serves on the House Armed Services Committee and the Agriculture Committee . On the Armed Services Committee, Representative Gillibrand serves on the Terrorism, Unconventional Threats and Capabilities subcommittee and the Seapower subcommittee. On the Agriculture Committee Representative Gillibrand serves on the Livestock, Dairy and Poultry subcommittee, Conservation Credit Energy and Research subcommittee and the Horticulture and Organic Agriculture subcommittee. In addition to her committee assignments, Congresswoman Gillibrand founded the Congressional High Tech Caucus with Representative Michael McCaul (R-TX) with the goal of ensuring that the United States remains at the forefront of emerging technologies and high tech industries.
By Brooklyn Gal on 01/06/2009 12:17 pm
Bonnie Oliver
Brooklyn Gal - Congresswoman Gillibrand might be the compromise candidate; however, I fear the Governor is under pressure to appoint either Kennedy or Cuomo. Will New Yorkers forgo a candidate who is not a celebrity? As a Republican, I hope for a Kennedy appointment. I think she is beatable in 2010 regardless of her capacity to raise money.
By Bonnie Oliver on 01/06/2009 2:25 pm
S.J. Morgan
High five Bonnie!!!
By S.J. Morgan on 01/06/2009 3:19 pm
Brooklyn Gal
Bonnie, As a Dem, I have also voted Republican. I never look to party lines. Do you always vote the Republican line in all elections? I ask because we don’t even know who the Republicans are going to put forth. NYS in my opinion has suffered under Republican leadership as well.
By Brooklyn Gal on 01/06/2009 3:49 pm
Bonnie Oliver
Brooklyn Gal - I was thinking more along the lines of the make-up in the Senate in order to break the stranglehold the Dems will have over the Congress for the next term. With Obama coming into office, it is to his advantage to have a cooperative Congress but I fear the big spending is going to continue….beginning with this second stimulus package. However, he is the elected President and should be given a fair chance to bring about “change” and economic recovery. Yet, I fear he is already on the wrong track and hope for a change of Congressional leadership in 2010. No, I have not voted Republican in every single election. First of all, I used to be a Democrat; changed during the Reagan years. Also, since California is a gerrymandered State, our members of Congress have a “lock” on re-election ….so much so that some of the seats are uncontested!
By Bonnie Oliver on 01/06/2009 6:08 pm
Brooklyn Gal
Why have reservations about a plan that has not even been proven?? Wrong track? So do we put millions of Americans on unemployment? We will be paying for it one way or another. And 2010 is not enough time to prove anything. Instead of hoping for a change in the Congressional leadership, I am going to hope for change in the outlook in our economy. Those tax rebate checks didn’t work. Nothing that McCain proposed (once he finally realized that the economy was in bad shape) made any sense. His plan is going to need time and support. I haven’t seen one Republican come up with any new ideas. We can’t stick to Reagan economics in a 21st century world. Too many things have changed, and we need to change with them.
By Brooklyn Gal on 01/06/2009 6:31 pm
Bonnie Oliver
Brooklyn Gal - I disagree. President Bush moved away from Reagan and the successes of the Reagan years. Even President-Elect Obama acknowledged those successes during the campaign …. much to the anger of former President Clinton. I do not advocate the continued economic policies of President Bush; however, he is not the only person at fault for the fall in the economy. That began during the Clinton years when those dreadful appointments were made to head Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and then the Congressional leaders Frank and Dodd denied any investigations into the sub-prime loan deals that were being made in the thousands by those same agencies. As I wrote, I am very skeptical of another stimulus package; you even acknowledged that the first one did not work and here the new administration is planning another - perhaps a trillion dollars. This is not change; this is madness.
By Bonnie Oliver on 01/06/2009 7:03 pm
Brooklyn Gal
I think the first one was mishandled by Paulson. And Frank and Dodd are just tips in this iceberg. That’s not Obama’s doing. But to put down a policy that hasn’t gone into effect yet and want a return to Republican rule does not seem fair either. Would we even be in a deeper mess if not for the war in Iraq. I don’t want to argue. Obama will make mistakes. But you are not even giving him a chance. His has one of the best economic teams advising him. Much better than Bush ever had.
By Brooklyn Gal on 01/06/2009 8:29 pm
Bonnie Oliver
You keep misstating me. I am giving Obama a chance and have made several comments here at wOw to that effect. However, you said yourself that the stimulus package or tax rebate package was a failure. If Obama is supporting the same thing, why do you think it will work later this Spring when it didn’t before? This has nothing to do with the separate legislation needed if further monies are needed by the automobile companies. I don’t think we are arguing; we are having a civilized debate…. I hope. But, I, too, tire of the subject. Have a nice evening.
By Bonnie Oliver on 01/06/2009 9:27 pm
Brooklyn Gal
I have no recollection of ever calling it a failure. I was watching Charlie Rose tonight on this subject, and both economist one who advised McCain and one Obama both said the same thing….Paulson mismanaged the bailout. But without the bailout, the market would have suffered greatly. But they both agreed something along the effects of what Obama is proposing is good. But they both added something has to be done to fix the housing problem.
By Brooklyn Gal on 01/06/2009 11:27 pm
beth willis
BG and Bonnie, I just tuned in this morning and award you major kudos for civilized discussion. Each of you has stated your position, questioned the other’s, formulated potential outcomes and continued with noted adjustments in discernment. What a concept: interchange without reference to generalizations, IQ levels or lipstick. Brava, ladies. Peace and grace
By beth willis on 01/07/2009 8:22 am
Lucinda Herbert
I’d be quite happy with Gillibrand or Carolyn Maloney — and nobody could say they didn’t earn it.
By Lucinda Herbert on 01/09/2009 10:12 pm
starry Nite
I guess in this case Caroline Kennedy gets no points for being a woman as some of the posters on here insists upon injecting.
By starry Nite on 01/06/2009 12:35 pm
Buh- Bye
she loses points with a lot of us. wants to have her cake and eat it too. first she shuns Hillary Clinton during the primary - then sits on the VP selection body and opposes her appointment for VP (despite Hillary’s 18 million votes) - then launches a PR campaign to take her senate seat? the unmitigated gall.
By Buh- Bye on 01/06/2009 1:33 pm