Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Caroline Kennedy Candidacy Watch | 01/06/2009 11:00 am

What's It Like to Campaign in Caroline Kennedy's Shadow?

By The Staff at wowOwow.com
© AP

In this series, which started in July ‘08, wowOwow follows the political news swirling around Caroline Kennedy since her surprise endorsement of Barack Obama and high-profile placement on his VP selection committee. Now, Caroline is ready to launch a political career of her own. With the Caroline Kennedy Candidacy Watch, we’ll follow all the latest news.

What’s it like to compete with a Kennedy? They’ve got the money, the name, the political pull. Some of them even have the looks. Then there’s that whole Camelot thing …

Put it all together and what do you have? A steep, uphill climb for anyone running against a Kennedy for, well, anything. Caroline Kennedy’s no exception.

Although Rep. Carolyn Maloney has been traveling throughout the Empire State meeting with local party leaders and voters, trying to convince them she’s the right person to fill Hillary Clinton’s Senate seat, we don’t hear too much about her, thanks to the media frenzy surrounding Kennedy. Also left in the winter cold is Rep. Steve Israel, D-NY, who is conducting a non-campaign for the seat. Both say it’s completely up to Gov. David Paterson to pick Clinton’s replacement, but they sure would like the job.

"Look, she’s Caroline Kennedy," Israel told The New York Times during a stop in Utica. "And it doesn’t bother me, dissuade me or affect me in the least."

On Monday, after a visit to Rochester, Maloney tried to turn her name non-recognition into an asset.

"If this is a celebrity beauty contest, I am not going to win," Maloney said. "But if people want to look at someone’s record and their service and their work to help people, I think I have a chance."

Maloney told The Hill that she traveled upstate over the weekend to "learn more about the challenges" and to answer the questions of voters there.

"I gained more of an understanding of what’s on people’s minds so that, if I were appointed, I would be better able to hit the ground running," Maloney said. "I heard a great deal about jobs, jobs and jobs."

Meanwhile, it’s pop quiz time for the contenders! The New York Times says Paterson has told Kennedy, Maloney, Israel, Rep. Kirsten Gillibrand, Rep. Jerrold Nadler and Nassau County executive Thomas Suozzi to fill out a 28-page questionnaire, which includes questions about their finances, job history and criminal records – if there are any. 

Kennedy came under some criticism recently when she wouldn’t disclose to the press details about her finances (which she is under no obligation to do right now).

But wait — the battle of the other five Senate hopefuls may not be as hard as they thought. A new poll out this week shows that Kennedy’s popularity has taken a "major hit" since she first threw her hat into the ring. Given the choice between Kennedy and Attorney General Andrew Cuomo, 58 percent prefer Cuomo to 27 percent for Kennedy. 

"When Caroline Kennedy was first mentioned as a possible Senate appointee there was a lot of enthusiasm among New York Democrats about her," said Dean Debnam, President of Public Policy Polling. "Her reputation has taken a pretty clear hit over the last month, and if Gov. Paterson does end up appointing her she’s going to have some work to do to overcome this bad first impression she’s made on New York voters." Looks like the tide is turning in the popularity portion of the games, anyway.

30 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

T P
Was Hillary Clinton offered the VP position to begin with?! Was she even in the top three? I’ll look forward to your post My Alias.
By T P on 01/06/2009 1:55 pm
Buh- Bye
What am I? Kreskin?
By Buh- Bye on 01/06/2009 4:07 pm
T P
Kreskin?! No but I thought you would know the answer:)
By T P on 01/06/2009 4:43 pm
S.J. Morgan
No disrespect intended to Caroline. but if I had the money she does I would have had a minimal nosejob and some dental work done! She would be a much more attractive looking woman today…Of course they do not always use the most flattering shots of her either.
By S.J. Morgan on 01/06/2009 5:18 pm
DeBúrca obj
She is a lovely, 51 year old woman. You have a problem with Democratic women’s looks it seems. First Michelle Obama should watch her weight because she is already “big” in some places, and now you are criticizing Kennedy’s appearance. I will take the look of this natural face over the the tightly pulled, botoxed faces of so many other women we see in the public.
By DeBúrca obj on 01/06/2009 8:47 pm
S.J. Morgan
DeBurca….it has nothing to to with her age…I’m 5 years older! It is the crook in her nose and her crooked teeth. Something MOST women in her income bracket would have had done as a teen. For the record I think Michelle is a very attractive woman . My comment about her larger frame was in response to your attack on Laura Bush’s weight gain. Since Laura is nealy 20 years older than Michelle she is entitled to those lbs and gray hair. I have never seen her dressed anything but beautiful for her age and the event. Never a hair out of place either. But I guess when you are a natural beauty ( I’m not) you age better. Caroline does favor the Kennedy women much more than her mother who was also a natural beauty. I’m just surprised that with her mother who was the world fashion plate (I loved her look) that she was not more inclined to do a few things like braces or a slight nose trim!
By S.J. Morgan on 01/06/2009 11:08 pm
starry Nite
I notice that the Ann Coulter conservative clones are all about superficial things such as looks. Style over content. What does that remind me of ?
By starry Nite on 01/07/2009 12:46 am
S.J. Morgan
Are you saying Nacy Pelosi is superficial ? She is into fashion and appearance. Hillary has her own stylist and make-up artist….are they superficial? Your attack on some that see the humor and wit in Anne are not all “clones”.
By S.J. Morgan on 01/07/2009 9:02 am
starry Nite
I am saying that putting emphasis on looks above everything else is not a good standard. I constantly hear references to Sarah Palin’s good looks and if you don’t like her you are jealous of her looks. Ann Coulter looks cheap and resembles a witch even with the long blonde hair. Too top it off I am not amused by her brand of humor. Calling people fags etc. Democrats are dumb- how to talk to a liberal etc. Nothing said about her is too harsh.
By starry Nite on 01/07/2009 11:58 am
beth willis
In my opinion, regardless of the intelligence and connections one enjoys, if she cannot speak with confidence and assurance to her constituents and her colleagues, she will not be effective in public office. I do not know the root of Caroline Kennedy’s ‘you knows’ and ‘ums’, but I do remember that President-Elect Obama sufferred from the ‘ums’ early in his campaign, and now appears to be completely cured except for the minor flareup under high stress. I imagine there are ‘you know’ specialists out there to tutor Ms. Kennedy, but time is short. I have great respect for the Kennedy family and the state of New York. Not so much the Senate. Maybe, she’ll attract attention to new perspectives or maybe she’ll just be a distraction. Those are just my thoughts. Those and $12 can get you a latte and a croissant, in Muleshoe anyway. Peace and grace
By beth willis on 01/07/2009 8:50 am
Maurine H
Caroline Kennedy has demonstrated that she needs a little more time spent studying before she’s ready to take the final. She has the intelligence and the advantage of growing up a Kennedy, but at this point she lacks political toughness and acumen.
By Maurine H on 01/07/2009 10:39 am
starry Nite
I agree that Caroline Kennedy does not speak or show well just as some one else - Sarah Palin - by golly gee- you betcha. Put a spin on it.
By starry Nite on 01/07/2009 11:53 am
Rowland Scherman
Caroline is more qualified for the Senate than three quarters of the already sitting members and definitely more than Cuomo. She’s a) smarter and b) less in the pocket of lobbyists.
By Rowland Scherman on 01/08/2009 7:11 am