Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

A Friend Stopped By | 11/06/2008 6:00 am

Where Are the Women of Iraq? by Vishakha N. Desai

How is it that the fall of a dictator could bring a worse fate for women in Iraq?
By Vishakha N. Desai
Courtesy of Vishakha N. Desai

Editor’s Note: Vishakha N. Desai is President and CEO of Asia Society, a global educational organization.

Sitting in Seoul’s fashionable "W" hotel last week, the last thing I expected to feel was a renewed sense of outrage about the Iraq war and what it has done to the reputation and prestige of my adopted country, the United States.  I had the honor of moderating a panel for the "World Women’s Forum 2008" that included Mia Farrow, Rory Kennedy and Yanar Mohammed, cofounder of the Organization of Women’s Freedom in Iraq.

Our conversation focused on women in conflict zones working for humanitarian efforts. While both Ms. Farrow and Ms. Kennedy were impressive, it was Yanar — much less well-known than the other two
ladies — who stole the show.

It was not so much her delivery as much as what she had to say about the plight of Iraqi women in the so-called "democratic" Iraq that truly broke our hearts. Trained as an architect, Yanar returned to Baghdad from Canada in 2003, precisely because she knew she was desperately needed there.

What she found was that the situation of women in Iraq had deteriorated since Saddam’s ouster. She said that under Saddam’s regime (as despicable as it was) Iraq had one of the most liberated societies in the Middle East with a high percentage of women going to college and becoming professionals; Yanar said her mother and women in that general milieu were expected to become doctors, engineers and parliamentarians with equal rights. Today almost 85 percent of young girls are practically illiterate.

Dressed in a Western-style outfit in Seoul, Yanar was in tears as she described how today, no Iraqi woman would dare walk out of her house without being covered head-to-toe or without carrying a gun! "How is it that the fall of a dictator and the arrival of ‘democracy’ could bring a worse fate for women in Iraq?" she asked.

It was equally upsetting to hear that TV channels are full of soap operas that show wife abuse, wife beating and other insults to women as idealized circumstances for the role of women. Women like Yanar and organizations like hers are not only seen as suspect but are routinely threatened. Yanar discussed phone calls that detailed how she would be kidnapped, tortured, and killed.

Mia, Rory and I, along with the audience of 700 women, primarily Korean, with a sprinkling of others, sat aghast listening to Yanar’s story and her experience.

Why is it that women’s lives are far worse in U.S.-occupied Iraq than under Saddam? Why is it that the new constitution of Iraq takes away the rights that women enjoyed before the occupation? Most importantly, why is it that we hear almost nothing about the plight of Iraqi women in the international or U.S. media?

Let us hope that when we finally leave Iraq, at least militarily, we will choose focusing  on the lives of women as one of our better-lasting legacies of this horrendous mistake.

18 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Amelie Poulain
Ms. Desai, I appreciate the use of the term “conflict zone” in reference to this dilemma you bring into the light for many people in this site. I notice that too many people still refer to this debacle in Iraq as a war as a result of administration brainwashing its citizens for the past 8 years. Until American administration renounces the continued use of the commitment to use preemptive strikes to “protect American interests abroad” used for the first time in Iraq, this kind of corrupt invasion will continue to destroy the fabric of any society that opposes our gas-guzzling life style dependency. It is very sad. And an atrocity against humanity. The trillions should have gone towards education, building a strong economy with local manufacturing segment, etc, and most of all, investing in a new infrastructure that uses new sources of energy. This is the only way to silently affect the bank books of the ultra rich oil barons of the world.
By Amelie Poulain on 11/07/2008 9:19 am
Tinka Parker
The charity Women For Women is specifically helping Iraqi widows and other women get back on their feet as professionals, after addressing basic needs. I am very proud to have been matched to a woman in Iraq who is striving to regain these fundamental diginities that we take for granted.
By Tinka Parker on 11/07/2008 9:55 am
J. Mark
Foist, this site is so Flash and banner intensive the upload speeds are VERY slow. Maybe it’s the server, but whatever it is it needs looking into. Recall Madeleine Albright said, “we think the price is worth it”, while calmly asserting that U.S. policy objectives were worth the sacrifice of half a million Arab children - a 1995 U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) report that 567,000 Iraqi children under the age of five had died as a result of the sanctions. [1] [1] http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1084 American foreign policy, without regard to what party occupies the executive branch, has historically relied on strong arm tactics and gun boat diplomacy in lieu of any meaningful dialogue. As a result, any consideration given to the aftermath of an invasion or the plight of women - and children - were minimal. Culturally, what existed under the prior dictatorship was an anomoly amid Islam and should be understood as such and acknowledged diplomatically before any “boots on the ground” is even considered. Any member of congress who voted to allow the Bush administration to move into Iraq - particularly those who did not even bother to read the resolution - should be shown the door without pension or any other benefit. Any member of congress who makes no effort to understand the repurcussions of military action in both cultural as well as political terms should suffer the same fate. No one can be responsible without such understanding. We need desperately to become responsible.
By J. Mark on 11/09/2008 10:06 am