Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Politics | 10/15/2008 9:05 am

Will We See More Sparks Fly at Tonight's Presidential Debate?

By The Staff at wowOwow.com
© AP

Barack Obama and John McCain will square off for their third and final debate. Here’s hoping there are a few more fireworks than at the last two.

Tonight’s debate will take place at Hofstra University in Hempstead, NY, and begins at 9 PM ET. The 90-minute face-off will likely focus on the economic crisis plaguing the country, and will be moderated by CBS News’s Bob Schieffer.

This time, the presidential hopefuls will sit at a table facing one another. Schieffer told the AP that he will try to get real answers from the candidates on what each one will bring to the presidency.

"By now, we’ve all heard their talking points," he said. "The time has come to be a little more specific."

Former CBS anchor Dan Rather talks to Politico.com on what a moderator should do to get the debaters to answer the questions asked and to stay on topic.

Both Obama and McCain have apparently made interesting demands for tonight’s showdown, CNN reports.

Both campaigns, for example, have requested that an air-conditioning vent be placed above their candidate to prevent sweating. They also both demanded a water glass, but not just any glass – an exact replica of water glasses used at the previous debates.

Obama has been prepping at a resort in Toledo, OH. CNN reports that advisers say that as the debate nears, the Illinois senator gets a sense of calm, turns off his cell phone three hours ahead of time and just focuses.

McCain was making final debate preparations in New York. He’s hoping for a game-changing performance tonight.

McCain has suggested that he is likely to bring up Obama’s links to William Ayers, a Vietnam-era radical who was a member of the violent Weather Underground group but later became a university professor in Chicago. He and Obama both worked with some of the same charities in Chicago, and Ayers hosted a reception for Obama when he first ran for the Illinois state Senate.

"We’re always prepared for him to be hyperaggressive in his attacks," Obama campaign aide Robert Gibbs said of McCain. "I just think that doesn’t work in an environment where so many people are concerned about the issues in front of them, not scare tactics they don’t see as helping to pay the bills."

Politico.com also reports that McCain is at odds with many of his top advisers over launching a new attack on Obama’s ties to his long-time pastor and mentor, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright. Vice-presidential nominee Sarah Palin and several top campaign officials see a sharp attack on Wright as a good chance to rattle Obama and force voters to rethink their support of him. But campaign officials say McCain is fighting against that tactic out of fear such an attack would be viewed as desperate and racist.

“Wright is off the table,” said one top campaign official. “It’s all McCain. He won’t go there. His advisers would have gone there.”

Obama Pulls Ahead

McCain needs a boost, if you believe the most recent polls.

-A new Reuters/C-SPAN/Zogby poll shows that that Obama has a 4-point national lead over McCain. Obama leads McCain 48 percent to 44 percent among likely U.S. voters in the latest four-day tracking poll, down slightly from Obama’s 6-point advantage on Tuesday. The poll has a margin of error of 2.9 percentage points.

-The latest New York Times/CBS News poll shows that McCain’s recent angry tone and personal attacks on Obama have hurt him. Six in 10 voters surveyed said McCain spent more time attacking Obama than explaining what he would do as president; by about the same number, voters said Obama was spending more of his time explaining than attacking. In general, the poll found that if the election were held today, 53 percent of those determined to be probable voters said they would vote for Obama and 39 percent said they would vote for McCain.

-A Wall Street Journal/Washington Post poll conducted by Quinnipiac says Obama has taken a solid lead in polls of four large battleground states: he’s ahead by double digits in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin, and by a smaller margin in Colorado. Obama’s prospects in these states has gotten better in the wake of the first two debates and by the fact that the electorate views him as better prepared to deal with the economy.

Click here to tell us: Will you watch the final presidential debate tonight?

Click here to participate in our live Presidential Debate reader forum.

 

40 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Mommy Dearest
Dahlings, the sparks may not fly at the debate, but they’ll surely fly here. Martinis at Maison Mommy, dears.
By Mommy Dearest on 10/15/2008 10:08 am
f p
Sparks? lolololololol more like smirks from McCain
By f p on 10/15/2008 11:31 am
georgia fatwood
Hm-m-m..sparks? I think I’m ready for someone to see stars after getting a hefty verbal thwack on his balding bean…. PS: It’s not that I am pro violence. I am just anti boredom.
By georgia fatwood on 10/15/2008 1:28 pm
f p
Yeppers, Georgia, I couldn’t agree more :-)
By f p on 10/15/2008 1:55 pm
beth willis
Frank, I’m thinking McCain is returning to his more popular, less republican personality. He is going to stop the attacks and put himself in position for a leadership role in an Obama administration. Personally, I think this would advance the healing process…….McCain “inside the tent rather than out”. Peace and grace
By beth willis on 10/15/2008 4:27 pm
f p
You may be correct Beth—but frankly I’m not counting on it at all.
By f p on 10/15/2008 4:39 pm
beth willis
Good answer, ’ Frankly,’ she said earnestly.:) Peace and grace
By beth willis on 10/15/2008 5:16 pm
Dab-a- do
And every smirk was duly noted.
By Dab-a- do on 10/16/2008 11:40 am
BookMomma LibraryLady
I agree with Mommy Dearest; sparks will fly here tomorrow!
By BookMomma LibraryLady on 10/15/2008 11:39 am
C Hardy
I actually would like to see sparks fly…I would like to see Obama and McCain both get emotional about our Country & about each other. Show us how you truly feel…I would enjoy it b/c it would show how me more then what I have seen in the past…
By C Hardy on 10/15/2008 12:39 pm
f p
Hmmmm. The last think I want in a leader is emotions—I would rather see logic and a steady hand.
By f p on 10/15/2008 2:09 pm
C Hardy
Ok so Frank you would rather not have a President with emotions? Please elaborate on that a little more for me, please…b/c I would rahter have one that does have emotins such as Love, Compassion, Guilt, Fear, Sad, Happy, Uplifting…I think if we lived by our good emotions more our world wouldnt be so damn hateful…So you would rather see a Robot Type President just standing there giving speeches with a steady hand? Logic is great but you are only as smart as your smartest advisor…Yes Bush’s advisors suck as does Bush and thankfully his 8 years are coming to an end…However, I dont want a President who doesnt show any emotion… Isnt it great how we all differ and can talk about it! That is why I love my country & would never think about leaving it…
By C Hardy on 10/15/2008 3:02 pm
f p
Emotions in a leader unless they are with close friends and family have no place in politics or in leadership of any kind. All that emotions do is cloud issues and make for erratic behaviour which we certainly don’t need in a President. All our best presidents have been leaders that resist the call to emotional response in situations where dire events can occur. I want someone in there who can think logically and cooly in a tense situation, not someone who will let his anger play freely and lead us into disaster because he is unable to control his emotions. Your type of president would be foolhardy in the extreme if hi emotions rule the day. And a fool i snot what we need in our current situation in the world.
By f p on 10/15/2008 3:16 pm
C Hardy
Frank, this is where we differ on opinions…Yes I want a leader with all those qualities as you have stated but I also want one who can show emotions…what is wrong with that…I am not talking about anger and for you to keep going back to that one, that is not what I am saying but show me LOVE and Compassion!
By C Hardy on 10/15/2008 3:29 pm
f p
Have you considered that love and compassion are just attributes that anyone can have and that from logic and strength compassion can arise—I’ve seen this happen and from strength and coolness compassion and love can arise and be attendant. Why are they mutually exclusive as they seem to be to you? I find them adjuncts and equals. Any good leader has that in them if they let it out. But anger negates all this and that I cannot nor will I abide in a leader for this country, hence my vote for Obama and not McCain. McCain has issues involving anger that are evident to anyone who has had PTSD that is left untreated and I see this in McCain—therefore i cannot in all good conscience vote for a man who exhibits this trait. It’s only logical CO.
By f p on 10/15/2008 3:46 pm