Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the username or e-mail address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Politics | 12/11/2008 12:25 pm

WomenCount: Mr. President, How About a Presidential Commission on Women?

By The Staff at wowOwow.com
WomenCount.org

Women, women, women.

One of the main themes we heard this election season was how important the woman’s vote was. And with Hillary Clinton and Sarah Palin both making their own kinds of history this year, many, in fact, hailed this year as the "year of the woman."

Women were wooed by John McCain and Barack Obama after Clinton dropped out of the presidential race. Alaska Gov. Palin turned on the charm to try to convince women she and McCain made the right team for them. Especially with the economy in the toilet, women – who make many of the financial and health-care-related decisions for the family (Did you know women make up 70 percent of this country’s purchasing power?) – were seen as a pivotal voting bloc.

But now that the election is over, WomenCount wants to make sure women aren’t forgotten.

“The notion was that this is the year of the woman, that’s what we kept hearing,” WomenCount Executive Director Stacy Mason told wowOwow. “Women were front and center in this election. Just because the election is over doesn’t mean we can let women retreat now from being at the center of the conversation. The election exposed too many things relevant to women … and the future of this country. We have to follow up.”

And what WomenCount wants is for President-Elect Obama to create a presidential commission for women in his first 100 days in office. The nonprofit political organization is recruiting signatures for a petition to send to Obama, asking him to bring together some of the best female minds around the country, from a variety of political, economic and philosophical backgrounds.

"For what?" you may ask.

So that women’s voices are heard in the conversations debating some of the most important issues that surfaced during this election – equal pay for equal work, a better health-care system, the economy, foreign policy and even Iraq.

“We just think this commission is the right thing right now,” Mason said.

The idea dates back to JFK’s time in office. In 1961, Kennedy created the first Presidential Commission on the Status of Women and named Eleanor Roosevelt its chair. That was 47 years ago, but WomenCount says today’s women’s needs are just as great.

"Our feeling is, this is another moment in time where people need to pay attention, leaders need to act and there needs to be this national conversation about the future of women,” Mason said.

WomenCount is reaching out to women’s groups around the country. As of now, about 20 groups – including the National Women’s Political Caucus, the Ms. Foundation and Women’s Media Center – have signed on. It’s also reaching out to Obama’s transition team, elected leaders and other notable females who have advocated on our behalf. Within the next week, the group plans on launching a viral, Web-based signature drive.

You can sign the petition by clicking here.

Women need to get more involved “so they feel they’re really a part of this and part of something and making this happen,” Mason explained.

Mason and four other women in California’s Bay Area from technology, journalism, political and business backgrounds run WomenCount. They formed the group during the Democratic primary season out of disgust over what they saw as gender bias and sexism toward Clinton during the Democratic primary.

Remember that incident in New Hampshire just before the primary there when two men stood up and screamed, “Iron my shirt!”?

Then there was the pressure Clinton fell under to drop out of the primary, despite having 18 million supporters and winning some races. Mason and friends were even more disgusted by the fact that Democratic Party leaders didn’t defend Clinton; in fact, they often contributed to the gender bias.

32 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

fp1
I personally believe this is a excellent idea and I signed the petition. It should be a permanent position in the coming and subsequent administrations. Period.
By fp1 on 12/11/2008 12:45 pm
ChipsAHoey
I would rather see women got 1/2 the Cabinet/Judicial/Ambassador and other high ranking posts myself instead of having a Commission to talk about it…
By ChipsAHoey on 12/11/2008 1:52 pm
rockyrocky
A nod to Frank, but I agree with you Chips. A “commission” usually has no powers or concrete goals except to gather facts. Already done. No more. Qualified women being effective at the upper echelons of business and government. That’s the way to go now.
By rockyrocky on 12/11/2008 6:14 pm
fp1
Consider it a start or a restart if you will after too may long years. Yes I agree that half the places on the Presidents cabinet would be well filled by women and many are. But not enough.
By fp1 on 12/12/2008 9:58 am
rockyrocky
I never expected you to disagree. That you understand this issue is completely evident in all your posts, Frank. If we were face to face, over drinks of course (mine non-alcoholic, please), I might press you further just to learn … But this was just a point of strategy, for which I for one am eminently un-qualified to determine. (Ha!) Such arrogance, huh?
By rockyrocky on 12/12/2008 10:47 am
fp1
lol It will come, maybe in the 2nd term—more women in cabinet posts—i have great hopes for Obama and for women in government.
By fp1 on 12/12/2008 11:07 am
rockyrocky
Thank you for your response, Frank. But I just reread what I wrote above [on 12/12/2008 10:47 am] and it sounds obsequious and flirtatious. Neither was my intent. I notice I do that now and then in my “real” life as well as here on wOw. It’s a kind of survival thing I do without thinking. Working on it …
By rockyrocky on 12/12/2008 11:24 am
fp1
Not to worry kiddo —ok? you take care—we’ll talk again later.
By fp1 on 12/12/2008 12:13 pm
BelindaJoy
The STUPIDEST notion I ever heard of! The organization WomenCount is grounded in sound ideas and beliefs. Their objectives are needed. But to waste our new president’s time by having him establish a commission “So that women’s voices are heard in the conversations debating some of the most important issues that surfaced during this election – equal pay for equal work, a better health-care system, the economy, foreign policy and even Iraq.” No. If I were President Obama I would be insulted. That all but accuses him of not being a man of his word in regard to women’s rights and his belief of an administration that is inclusive. He has already (less than 45 days from his election) proven he will have women at his side. How dare they even doubt him?
By BelindaJoy on 12/11/2008 4:53 pm
WalterWallis
Can you say “Patronize”? Equal pay for equal work has been the law for a quarter century. The building trades have seen little success getting women to enter apprenticeships to get into well paid craft work. Should we force women to take their share of carpenter, steelworker and garbage collecting jobs? We should give them that choice, then respect their choice. California has 2 women senators who jointly have been a disaster for the economy and for the security of the United States.
By WalterWallis on 12/11/2008 5:10 pm
rockyrocky
Just a thought, Walter: I don’t know who you are talking about, but not necessary for my question: What does being women have to do with being “a disaster”? If they had been men doing the same things, would you be suggesting that being male was their problem?
By rockyrocky on 12/11/2008 6:18 pm
WalterWallis
If their success had been vaunted as a triumph of male rights, I sure as hell would make that an issue.
By WalterWallis on 12/12/2008 9:41 am
rockyrocky
Did the women in question do that? If so, well, you’ve got something of a point there. You most probably already know this, but just an aside: I was a “first” once or twice. I learned that in an unequal society “losing” isn’t blamed on human foible, instead it’s blamed on that thing that makes one different, whether class gender race—and “winning” is due to being exceptional. In an equal society, “winning” or “losing” is due to the human qualities the individual brings to the arena, nothing more or less. Peace, Walter.
By rockyrocky on 12/12/2008 10:38 am
WalterWallis
RR, I think I’m in love with you.
By WalterWallis on 12/12/2008 11:24 am
rockyrocky
Yikes! Cut that out, Walter.
By rockyrocky on 12/12/2008 11:27 am