Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Politics | 12/19/2008 1:55 pm

Women's Groups Blast New Bush Enforcement of 'Moral Objection' to Abortion (Video)

By The Staff at wowOwow.com
© Shutterstock

Women’s groups and some women in Congress are crying foul over a new Bush administration rule that they say is a parting shot against women’s rights to abortion and contraceptive services.

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) unveiled the regulation Thursday – which takes effect next month – that aims to protect health-care workers from being forced to take actions that go against their conscience. That may include helping to perform abortions, discussing abortions or doing anything else they have a “moral objection to.”

HHS says there are already legal statutes on the books that protect health-care providers so they can practice according to their conscience, and that these new rules simply increase awareness of and compliance with those rules for providers who receive federal funds.

“Doctors and other health-care providers should not be forced to choose between good professional standing and violating their conscience,” HHS Secretary Mike Leavitt said.

HHS says the rule would "in no way restrict health-care providers from performing any legal service or procedure. If a procedure is legal, a patient will still have the ability to access that service from a medical professional or institution that offers it. For example, the regulation does not affect the ability of medical institutions to provide abortion services in accordance with the law."

The rule is actually a watered-down version of the one originally floated, which created a firestorm of criticism from women’s groups. The original language would have explicitly defined abortion, for the first time in a federal law or regulation, as anything that interfered with a fertilized egg after conception.

But women’s groups say the new rule still goes far beyond the scope of any statute ever passed by Congress, and that it will limit women’s access to medical care.

"Today, the Bush administration did the unconscionable," the National Women’s Law Center said in an e-mail to supporters. HHS “has recklessly and callously finalized a regulation that undermines patients’ access to vital health-care services and information — putting women’s health and lives at serious risk.”

NOW is asking supporters to call on President-elect Barack Obama to repeal the rule once he takes office. Planned Parenthood is making a similar plea [video below], saying that even emergency-room workers caring for a sexual-assault victim could refuse to provide information about emergency contraception.

Democratic Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton, NY, and Patty Murray, WA, vowed to do whatever it takes to undo the regulation.

"This is the kind of desperate, ideologically driven politics that helped convince Americans it’s time for change," Murray said, according to The Hill. "I will work with President-elect Obama to explore every possible option to ensure women continue to have access to the health care they need."

Added Clinton, soon-to-be secretary of state: "This regulation threatens access to critical health-care services and information, while upending the carefully crafted religious protections for patients and providers already in law."

House Speaker Nancy Pelos, D-CA, also weighed in:

In issuing this midnight regulation, the Bush Administration has once again rejected medical and sound science in favor of misguided ideology that has no place in our government … Make no mistake: This is a direct assault on women’s health care and may jeopardize patients’ rights to receive quality, comprehensive health-care services. Congress will work with President-elect Obama to reverse this rule.

Feel strongly about this issue? Visit the websites of NOW or Planned Parenthood to make your voices heard.

428 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Patty E
Seems this ‘law’ has been kept behind a locked door, out of sight, until it was too late—-In a televised interview, I learned the law had passed ‘through Congress’! and therefore could not be knocked down by Executive Order, once Obama takes office. I have to admit, I have NEVER watched an outgoing President work so hard at destroying the country in his last 2 months of office! Just who is paying him? Iran? As I learned about this, though, what came to mind is that this may not ONLY afffect women—it COULD affect men, too. Imagine this: A man experiencing a mid-life crisis: decides he wants to ‘fool around’ with younger women—but he does NOT want to become a ‘daddy’. The guy tries to make an appointment with his doctor, to get ‘snipped’ (the male form of birth control). Because the receptionist does not believe in birth control ( maybe she doesn;t believe in a man fooling around on his wife, and uses BC as the ‘moral conscience excuse’—-she refuses the appointment… Maybe we all should remind those men who passed this bill on behalf of GW, that it works against them too! gasp! They will have to stop foolin’around!
By Patty E on 12/19/2008 2:25 pm
Kathleen Oliver
<< I have NEVER watched an outgoing President work so hard at destroying the country in his last 2 months of office! Just who is paying him? Iran? >> I’ve been asking myself the same thing, Patty … but about the entire 8 years. The problem is made all the worse because we finance our mischief with money borrowed from the Bank of China; this roughly doubles the cost of anything. Thus a 1 trillion dollar war will cost, when finally paid for, at least 2 trillion (counting interest). But since we rarely pay our debts, but keep rolling them over, the real cost is unknowable. In my head, when I ask myself “just who is paying him”, it comes out like this [ http://www.wowowow.com/cl/142692 ]: << Imagine a group of terrorists sitting around trying to dream up an attack on America that would cost us at least 2 trillion dollars in damages plus kill and mutilate tens of thousands of Americans; oh, yes, it also needs to gut the military and render them nearly incapable of dealing with any new threat. That’s a tall order: what are the chances they would come up with even 1 such idea? Yet this is precisely what we have done for them: a free gift for you-know-who. Brilliant. >>
By Kathleen Oliver on 12/23/2008 9:31 pm
Mary NSB-Florida
It’s anticipated to take years, or possibly decades, to correct what President Bush is doing n his last 60 days. That in addition to what it has done to the United States and the World with his selection of Cheney to run the world on his behalf.
By Mary NSB-Florida on 12/19/2008 3:01 pm
Jim Henley
This comment has been removed per management request.
By Jim Henley on 12/20/2008 2:45 pm
John G
Religion will be the base cause of so many more ridiculous actions. Born-again into insanity. Off with his head… if not for this, then the auto bailout.
By John G on 12/19/2008 4:19 pm
John G
Maybe we all should remind those men who passed this bill on behalf of GW, that it works against them too! gasp! They will have to stop foolin’around! By Patty E on 12/19/2008 3:25 pm I don’t think it ever stopped ‘em before Roe vrs Wade so won’t have any effect now, either. This is just another power play of someone’s interpretation of the omnipotent deity’s directive… as always, aimed from male directly at female!
By John G on 12/19/2008 4:24 pm
beverly linens
I warned everyone several months ago this was coming. Yes it does include birth control for men as well. It is not only men who want to fool around but men who with their wives who have decided their family is large enough who could be afrfected. It is a direct attack on the right of anyone to decide they know best how large their family should be.
By beverly linens on 12/19/2008 5:00 pm
Irish Eyes NY
beverly l. so you consider abortion birth control? My God woman, what is wrong? The pill, condoms, etc are birth control, not abortion. If I were a nurse, I would not be a part of the abortion mill. AND BELIEVE ME, ITS NOT GOING TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE EITHER. There are plenty of nurses out there who will work the abortion mill.——-so it has nothing to do with not being able to get medical care. Geeze what a bunch.
By Irish Eyes NY on 12/22/2008 7:22 pm
beverly linens
I was talking about a vasectomy. Planned Parenthood provides many services other than abortions.
By beverly linens on 12/22/2008 7:41 pm
beverly linens
In fact I just got off the phone with an old friend who doesn’t believe in birth control and education about family planning shouldn’t be done either. Those girls who find themselves unfortunately pregnant should be encouraged to give them up for adoption. I guess she thinks the adoption mills need product. We couldn’t even discuss it, it was just a fact she believes in.
By beverly linens on 12/22/2008 7:45 pm
Catherine Kaiman
Bush is a moron! If only that Iraqi man had better aim! This is already happening in Canada, I have a friend who took her grand daughter (whom she has legal custody of) to the doctor, for a prescription for birthcontrol, (she already had an unplanned pregnancy which resulted in her giving birth to her first child at the age of 17). Little did my friend know that this doctor was Catholic, and this doctor denied giving this girl birth control because it was against her religious beliefs, (those were the doctors words). Although, in this case it didn’t really matter, because they did find a doctor that would prescribe birthcontrol, only this girl wasn’t responsible enought to make she she got her birth control refill, and ended up pregnant again, she just gave birth to a daughter two weeks ago. This girl just turned 19. My friend, who has custody of 4 of her grandchildren, is now responsible for two great grandchildren as well.
By Catherine Kaiman on 12/19/2008 5:42 pm
Jim Henley
This comment has been removed as per management request.
By Jim Henley on 12/20/2008 3:01 pm
HA BIBI
I love you Jim! Thanks for telling the brutaly honest truth. :)
By HA BIBI on 12/21/2008 3:41 pm
Jim Henley
This comment has been removed per management request.
By Jim Henley on 12/21/2008 9:08 pm
Kryssi K
I have a friend who works at Planned Parenthood. The one she works at doesn’t even do abortions. And they actually try to convince you to make abortion your LAST resort. But hey, who needs facts in this country, right?
By Kryssi K on 12/21/2008 3:45 pm