Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Politics | 12/19/2008 1:55 pm

Women's Groups Blast New Bush Enforcement of 'Moral Objection' to Abortion (Video)

By The Staff at wowOwow.com
© Shutterstock

Women’s groups and some women in Congress are crying foul over a new Bush administration rule that they say is a parting shot against women’s rights to abortion and contraceptive services.

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) unveiled the regulation Thursday – which takes effect next month – that aims to protect health-care workers from being forced to take actions that go against their conscience. That may include helping to perform abortions, discussing abortions or doing anything else they have a “moral objection to.”

HHS says there are already legal statutes on the books that protect health-care providers so they can practice according to their conscience, and that these new rules simply increase awareness of and compliance with those rules for providers who receive federal funds.

“Doctors and other health-care providers should not be forced to choose between good professional standing and violating their conscience,” HHS Secretary Mike Leavitt said.

HHS says the rule would "in no way restrict health-care providers from performing any legal service or procedure. If a procedure is legal, a patient will still have the ability to access that service from a medical professional or institution that offers it. For example, the regulation does not affect the ability of medical institutions to provide abortion services in accordance with the law."

The rule is actually a watered-down version of the one originally floated, which created a firestorm of criticism from women’s groups. The original language would have explicitly defined abortion, for the first time in a federal law or regulation, as anything that interfered with a fertilized egg after conception.

But women’s groups say the new rule still goes far beyond the scope of any statute ever passed by Congress, and that it will limit women’s access to medical care.

"Today, the Bush administration did the unconscionable," the National Women’s Law Center said in an e-mail to supporters. HHS “has recklessly and callously finalized a regulation that undermines patients’ access to vital health-care services and information — putting women’s health and lives at serious risk.”

NOW is asking supporters to call on President-elect Barack Obama to repeal the rule once he takes office. Planned Parenthood is making a similar plea [video below], saying that even emergency-room workers caring for a sexual-assault victim could refuse to provide information about emergency contraception.

Democratic Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton, NY, and Patty Murray, WA, vowed to do whatever it takes to undo the regulation.

"This is the kind of desperate, ideologically driven politics that helped convince Americans it’s time for change," Murray said, according to The Hill. "I will work with President-elect Obama to explore every possible option to ensure women continue to have access to the health care they need."

Added Clinton, soon-to-be secretary of state: "This regulation threatens access to critical health-care services and information, while upending the carefully crafted religious protections for patients and providers already in law."

House Speaker Nancy Pelos, D-CA, also weighed in:

In issuing this midnight regulation, the Bush Administration has once again rejected medical and sound science in favor of misguided ideology that has no place in our government … Make no mistake: This is a direct assault on women’s health care and may jeopardize patients’ rights to receive quality, comprehensive health-care services. Congress will work with President-elect Obama to reverse this rule.

Feel strongly about this issue? Visit the websites of NOW or Planned Parenthood to make your voices heard.

428 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

HA BIBI
Kryssi, this is a blog site not a class in punctation. And yes, that would be stupid of you to make issue of such. :)
By HA BIBI on 12/23/2008 9:14 pm
Char Star
Elaine, did you ever wonder why people turn & walk away when they see you coming at parties? We may be able to help you figure out why….
By Char Star on 12/27/2008 12:17 am
HA BIBI
Charred (Burnt out) I don’t party. you on the other hand really need to do something about your addictions!
By HA BIBI on 12/27/2008 8:28 am
Ro H
1. They are lazy and don’t want to take the time nor effort to learn what God and Jesus has to say. AND 2. They don’t want to give up their lives of immorality.By Elaine AL Meqdad on 12/22/2008 8:17 pm You who believe you speak for God and for Jesus Christ, have no real concept of who or what they are in the first place. WE did NOT create God, or Jesus - but, everytime you write of your so called faith, you continue to define who and what God is, and tell God how to behave toward humanity. You continue to impose threats of God and Jesus the risen Christ on to so many, and you have no idea that you are blaspheming God’s holy of holies. God does NOT ordain injustice, or disceit, nor does God appreciate the hatred which is being spewed in His/Her name. Go away! We don’t need your nonsense anymore… The God of the Old Testament, and the God\Christ of the New Testament spew you out when hatefilled and zealous against God’s Own! I rebuke YOU in the name of God and all that is HOLY! Go away!
By Ro H on 12/26/2008 9:35 pm
HA BIBI
Truth hurts you doesn’t it!
By HA BIBI on 12/26/2008 10:14 pm
Irish Eyes NY
Spew hate you said of Elaine? What exactly was hateful speech? I guess you call the truth hateful, huh? As soon as you can’t come up with a viable answer, its ATTACK TIME.
By Irish Eyes NY on 12/22/2008 7:55 pm
HA BIBI
Yes Irish, they have been spewing for day’s now and still no cognizant arguement nor viable answer. Now that’s what singles them out as the true idiot’s that they are. Not once did I say God hates them yet spoke to the S person and told her quite the contrary. But at the same time, I in no uncertain terms, stated that murder is wrong and God himself has a nice warm place for those who don’t stop killing babies as they are also his children, they belong to him and he is the one who decides when it’s time for his to come home and he definately doesn’t want some loon deciding that, by offing his children. They are robbing those children of his, their due process to life.
By HA BIBI on 12/22/2008 8:35 pm
B. Nyce
All “attacks” violate the Ten Commandments of Posting on our website. They will be deleted.
By B. Nyce on 12/24/2008 6:48 pm
Irish Eyes NY
b, nyce: Well I hope you sent the same e-mail to Char-starbroil, since she called me a “bitch” first. I understand this is supposed to be a 2 way street but as soon as a conservative posts on here——————-all the witches start their attack, because they can’t stand a differing opinion,
By Irish Eyes NY on 12/25/2008 11:14 am
B. Nyce
This comment is for everyone. I am urging EVERYONE to stop with the name calling. It’s obvious you all have very different views about this sensitive topic. Calling people stupid, witch, bitch, etc. is just plain immature. Please state your opinion in a dignified way and for those who don’t agree with you, that is their right.
By B. Nyce on 12/25/2008 4:38 pm
HA BIBI
B. Nyce, there’s a spill that needs cleaning up on the Tory burch thread. Were not supposed to have name calling….Correct, Thanks!
By HA BIBI on 12/25/2008 11:12 pm
Sue J
No one, doctor, nurse, pharmacist or cashier, should be able to inflict their choice on an unsuspecting woman.” Yet you can inflict your “choice” on us? No. Doesn’t work that way. We have rights too. We have the right to a safe, secure working environment. We have the right to our jobs. We have the right not to preform procedures against our beliefs. You, as a pt, have the right to care but you do NOT have the right to dictate that care. If performing an abortion on you violates my rights, I have the right to refuse and have another professional do the procedure if they so chose. That may mean you have to go elsewhere as elective abortion is NOT a life threatening medical problem that needs immediate treatment. You, as a pt, have the OBLIGATION to seek appropriate care and information. As of yet, no one has answered my question on what gives “choicers” the right to take my right of job security and moral and/or religious beliefs away?
By Sue J on 12/22/2008 5:30 pm
Serena .
Perhaps you should have chosen a different line of work.
By Serena . on 12/22/2008 5:38 pm
HA BIBI
Unfortunately Sue, they will not answer you, because they have no valid reason. It is only about their rights that they care about. They harbor the same selfishness that prompts a woman to rid herself of her “problem” in the first place, even if it comes to murder. They are willing to kill so they can be free to continue spreading their legs and taking no responsibility nor precautionary steps to avoid an unwanted pregnancy in the first place. Don’t worry, when enough people are confronted with being put in this position and stand up against it, you will see that they won’t be able to continue in their ridiculous attempts.
By HA BIBI on 12/22/2008 5:57 pm
Char Star
Sue J, if you really have worked ED—& I wonder because professionals have not called it “ER” in a decade at least & that’s what you called it—then you would know that an abortion CAN be a medical emergency. Why are you here trying to get others to fight with you, while you try to scare potential patients into thinking they may not get the care they need? Is that professional, sister?
By Char Star on 12/27/2008 12:27 am