Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Politics | 04/28/2008 6:46 pm

wOw's Views on the News: Is It Time for Clinton or Obama to Throw In the Towel?

By The Staff at wowOwow.com
© Shutterstock
By staying in the race, are the Democratic candidates inadvertently sabotaging their party’s chances of winning the election? This weekend, Howard Dean called on Clinton or Obama to drop out of the race for the candidacy by June. "Either of these candidates, if it’s time for them to go, they’ll know it and they will go," Dean said, according to the Associated Press. But will they? Should they? And if so, should they wait until the Puerto Rico primary or should the move be made now?

281 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Frannie Em
Mugsy, it seems like everyone is crazy about this, but I think in the long run it won’t make that much difference. There are so many things that can happen between now and Nov. I think the party should do what it wants - I think Hillary should do what she wants. Look how little Bill’s affairs affected election, and they were popping out all over. Hey, this is one of the greatest horse races we have had in a long time.
By Frannie Em on 04/29/2008 3:57 pm
Michael Salling
Amen sister - what doe that acronym stand for anyway?
By Michael Salling on 04/29/2008 5:57 am
Michael Salling
OOPS, guys — that Amen sister was for JJGB — I’ve got my answer to the acronym puzzle? let’s have a contest to see who can make up the best.
By Michael Salling on 04/29/2008 6:12 am
Star Lawrence
We have a system—or sort of a one. Let it work! That bald-headed guy, some talk DJ, Smerconish?—made me laff last night when he said, “If he tries to run out the clock, she will take him out. She’s got game.”
By Star Lawrence on 04/29/2008 9:54 am
Bonnie Oliver
Whatever damage they are doing to themselves and the Democratic Party has probably already reached the level where there is no more harm that can be done. The difficulty will be in assembling a team for the General Election. It is my understanding that to make those preparations will likely take a couple of months?? (Really???) The rules for nomination are pretty clear. The first candidate who receives the required number of delegates..etc…so until that point is reached, both candidates should remain. I would like the case to be put forth at the Convention and let democracy begin…..allow both names to be put up for nomination/ speeches advocating both candidates/ then the seconds and more stirring speeches. I see a wonderful opportunity for the Democrats to heal each other and prepare for the Autumn with enthusiasm and grit. Let the delegates be heard/ let the super-delegates be heard, if necessary. This would be ‘democracy in action’ and should play beautifully for the TV audience. I am not being cynical, I truly think it could be the very best of politics. AND after the election in November and regardless of who wins, I think the head of the Democratic Party and whoever else designed this idea of “super-delegates” should be tossed immediately into the Potomac. And if Michigan and Florida are not seated at the Convention, the whole Democratic Party will take a strong hit for “not letting every vote count”. The Convention must include some representation from those two States…..it must! Sorry…..I think I got a bit carried away here. But this has all been so terribly unnecessary. When politicians start wearing those little dictator caps…..watch out. How could Mr. Dean be so insensitive to think ‘his way’ or ‘no way’ could be acceptable choices?
By Bonnie Oliver on 04/29/2008 12:40 am
Jenny Oops
Michigan and Florida are going to be a BIG problem. Not looking at which state went for whom, the people in Michigan and Florida have to have their vote counted. It is probably going to be another mess for the — pardon the expression — Supreme Court to clean up. Oh, America, America — where art thou?
By Jenny Oops on 04/29/2008 5:39 am
Star Lawrence
The Supremes? Oh, Lord. Did you see Scalia on “60 minutes”? Ack, what a scornful know-it-all.
By Star Lawrence on 04/29/2008 9:59 am
Michael Salling
I guess I didn’t get the memo Bonnie? Was this supposed to be a serious question?
By Michael Salling on 04/29/2008 6:18 am
Bonnie Oliver
If you mean that the nominations should be formally made at the Convention, then seconded, and finally voted upon with each State calling out their delegate count……yes I am very serious. I was just out of grammar school when JFK won his nomination and the suspense and anticipation of the party finally selecting a nominee was not only newsworthy but just plain entertaining. The Conventions are televised for a purpose. Why not make the show and good one? Oop….another question and yes it is a serious one.
By Bonnie Oliver on 04/29/2008 7:10 am
Michael Salling
mea culpa, Bonnie — i meant: did Joan expect us to take her question seriously? What a difference a day makes. see my comment near the end of this topic.
By Michael Salling on 04/29/2008 6:29 pm
Frank Peterson
Bonnie: I agree with you whole-heartedly.
By Frank Peterson on 04/29/2008 7:53 am
Alessan O
Let the primary play out out as is, neither should drop out until the balance of the states have voted. Stop telling them to drop out, especially Hillary Clinton. This whole thing will be wrapped up by the end of June. No dropping out, period. I am so tired of the pundits and media telling the candidates what to do, and causing the people to pick the wrong candidate.
By Alessan O on 04/29/2008 12:41 am
Michael Salling
It will go to the convention, if the super delegates don’t get stampeded after June 3rd or Barak doesn’t see the writing on the wall and make the supreme sacrifice and accept his fate of being the first Af/Am VP and and the first African American president it 2016 (at the latest). Now at the risk or being accused of playing the race card (and for those who need to define terms the race card can only be played by blacks — that’s what Clarence Thomas did when he outrageously charged the his opponents were engaged in a high tech. lynching because they let Anita Hill and others present the evidence — the seminal work on this is Richard Thomas Ford’s “The Race Card” just out) let me OPINE (for what it’s worth) — Barak has as much admitted that his politcial career — from the time of his election at least — is that Americans for the most part are NOT opposed to affirmative action [and certainly not the MSM media] because if he had been a white man he would never have delivered his famous speech at the 2004 convention and no one would have noticed thought him anything special when he won the Senate race. Geraldine Ferraro could have chosen her words more carefully, but her missle was on the mark.
By Michael Salling on 04/29/2008 6:34 am
Dora M
Not only is he as much of a candidate but he is AHEAD… they both have a right to be in the fight but should really be clear about the fact that the fight should be against McCain and four more years of the Bush administration, not about destroying each other. Make your case about why you would be a better candidate not why your opponent would be a worse one, I think we’re all tired of slash and burn politics.
By Dora M on 04/29/2008 12:43 am
Mugsy Peabody
Well, apparently Senator Clinton has her eye on the ball, because right now she’s leading McCain by 10 points.
By Mugsy Peabody on 04/29/2008 12:54 am