Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Politics | 04/30/2008 12:00 am

wOw's Views on the News: Is Rev. Wright Leading to the Demise of the Obama Campaign?

By The Staff at wowOwow.com
© AP
Sen. Obama unequivocally denounced his former pastor yesterday, expressing his outrage and sadness at Rev. Wright’s recent speeches. Click here to read about it on MSNBC. Was this the right thing for Obama to do? Should he be ignoring Rev. Wright altogether at this point? Ultimately, will the controversy derail Obama’s candidacy? Does this justify Sen. Clinton’s decision to remain in the race, despite her long odds and growing pressure from some Democrats?

281 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Maurine H
Phyllis, this isn’t about religion. It’s about racism in America. Religion is just the excuse.
By Maurine H on 04/30/2008 2:29 pm
phyllis Doyle Pepe
Maurine: I’m not so sure about that. But I agree that it certainly is about racism.
By phyllis Doyle Pepe on 04/30/2008 5:13 pm
~ countrywoman ~
Responding with appreciation to Phyllis: I am new to the e-community thought-sharing process. In my travels through this forum I have been frequently amazed by the way folks can perceive the same things so very differently. One will insist upon the validity of guilt by association, another will point out the wisdom of judging and defining a person by her/his own words and actions, (Thanks Lorraine and others) some are willing to spew forth rumor, innuendo, and vitriol to support their positions ……just interesting phenomena until it spills over into a critically important arena like selecting our leadership. At that point it has consequences, the potential to affect the quality of life for all of us. I am so hopeful when I see postings that actually inform and advance meaningful dialog, and when I read that a large number of us are concerned and frustrated by the way the media is manipulating the agenda. (One shining exception is wowowow and the great ladies who created it!) Recognizing and defining a problem is how change begins. Sitting up here on my little farm in Oregon, I try to be realistic, to find small ways to make a difference. Just so, early this morning I whispered, and later today I read that someone heard me and validated my perspective. I am hearing your voices too, and for the most part, feeling encouraged by them. What an upper! :-)
By ~ countrywoman ~ on 04/30/2008 8:39 pm
Michael Salling
Howdy, country girl — May I buy you lunch when I get to Oregon? Will you let me know if you ever get to Hawaii? mike/misha in honolulu kokuaguy@gmail.com
By Michael Salling on 05/01/2008 12:00 am
Jenny Oops
Country Woman, I think this ‘holy’ espisode ‘may’ indeed interfere with Obama’s campaign for president. I find Americans very gullible when it comes to language/definition/words tacked onto any given issue. And, there are those who understand this power of language who also have a serious absence of character/integrity/authenticity/honesty when using that power. Karl Rove and buddies come to mind. Note: Senator Max Clelland (sp), who was in a wheel chair minus arms and legs from Vietnam, who lost his senate seat because ‘they’ said — he’s not ‘patriotiic’. Who dumped the word ‘elitist’ on Obama?? ‘Elitist’??? Obama is anything but ‘elitist. Then we have the Kerry “Swiftboat’ thing and Papa Bush’s ‘Willie Horton’, etc., etc. Americans strike me as being frighteningly influenced by words and definitons that anyone can toss around just for the heck of it. I would hope that all of us would do our own thinking, but we don’t.
By Jenny Oops on 04/30/2008 8:58 pm
Michael Salling
Jenny, thank you for making this point so passionately. Though there were some attempts in the MSM (and in the wowOwow community) to distinguish the meanings of the words “elite” and “elitist” and keep the meanings in mind in discussions such as this, I think the distinction bears repeating. An elite cadre of forces in the military is a good thing. It is good at what it does, it’s highly trained and valuable, and the standards for entry into the group are high, and rightly so. However, if its members are a bunch of “elitists”, that’s not a good thing. They believe themselves to be entitled to discriminate against those not granted entry into the group. They see themselves as “entitled” to special treatment and benefits, simply because of their membership and regardless of their true merit. We see far too much of this in our society of course, and so the word elite comes to have the same kind of screwy connotation that has unfortunately stained the word ‘liberal’ for all time. Those who attend elite educational institutions such as the Annapolis Naval Academy, Harvard and Yale are undeniably members of a unique and potentially powerful group, and I see no reason for them to deny being among the most elite members of our society in that sense. Whether or not they are elitists is a determination that has to be made based on an entirely different set of criteria. There is no evidence whatsoever that I am aware of which would put Clinton, McCain, or Obama in such an execrable category. Mucho mahalo for your post. m
By Michael Salling on 05/01/2008 4:06 am
Jozie Lee
This situation appears to show BObama’s lack of experience. Undecided voters may be swayed away from his campaign. Only time will tell. If he does well in North Carolina he should be ok. As for HClinton - she should stay in the race until the convention or until she runs out of money. Why quit? She may be the last candidate standing.
By Jozie Lee on 04/30/2008 2:39 am
Marge Ferriol
Like it or not, the whole Rev. Wright fiasco has opened America’s eyes to the hatred and fear that still exists in both racial camps, and there is no “post-racial” candidate. My problem with Obama’s long association with the congregation is that he was intellectually dishonest about it. For me, it’s not the so-called anti-american speak that bothers me, its the promotion of hatred or, at least justification of hatred. Obama, ever the intellectual, allows the perameters to become too broad in what is acceptable if one is truely trying to heal and unite. While one must listen to all points of view, one must also stand up and reject those views that are adding to the problem rather than to the solution. Obama knew that Rev. Wright’s comments, the ones that he admits to hearing, would not be acceptable to a large segment of the white populace, but he was dishonest with Rev. Wright and the voters. He allowed Rev. Wright to BELIEVE that he agreed with him but simply had to keep him in the background because lesser intelluctuals wouldn’t understand such an association. His view that blue collar white voters are inferior intellectually was left out of his professorial explanation at his San Francisco fund raiser as to why they would not vote for him. I think he showed poor judgement in attempting to run for office so early in his career without any real political experience. Frankly, I think that each and every debate that he had with Hillary should have told him that he was not ready. Now, if this fiasco is fatal to his candidacy, he can not even run as Hillary’s V.P. If he does get the nomination, I am affraid he will not be elected.
By Marge Ferriol on 04/30/2008 3:27 am
Mugsy Peabody
From the “drop out question,” the thing that disturbs me about Wright is, lots of my gay friends go to black churches because they are black and have to listen to the homophobic nonsense of the black ministers, but go because that is their community. And are all catholics responsible for the nutso pronouncements of the popes on homosexuality, a woman’s right to choose, fill-in-the-blank? As we all know by now, I’m not an Obama supporter. But I object to his being saddled with this. Do we also have to hold him responsible for the opinions of his barber? His dry cleaner? If he agrees with this man and is lying about it, that’s one thing. But he said, “Whoa, Charlie, that’s not me talking.” I believe he goes to that church for community. Most of my black friends do. Perfectly reasonable, rational people. But they do love to stand and sway and clap to the music (as do I) and that’s where it happens. There just isn’t a lot of atheist or agnostic gospel music around, friends. I’ve been to a bull fight, but I don’t believe in blood sport. Give the guy a break on this one. And Go Hillary!
By Mugsy Peabody on 04/30/2008 3:32 am
Gianna Bracco
Mugsy: The only thing you said that I disagree with is to compare Obama’s spiritual mentor with his barber or dry cleaner. You gotta admit those are two completely different relationships. Rev. Wright guided him through marriage, the baptism of his daughters; he prayed with him and his family in Springfield after declaring his candidacy for president. I think you would get to know a person a little better than “take a little more off the sides!”
By Gianna Bracco on 04/30/2008 1:17 pm
Mugsy Peabody
Well, having grown up in Bloomington, I’d probably have been going to the Rev. Wright’s church if it hadn’t been for the Bloomington Unitarian. And as to the barber, my hair person knows more about me than any preacher, truth be told. My point, of course, is when you are in the Oval Office and it’s you that carries the “football” of nuclear weapons, it is only you. Not your husband, not your minister, not your barber.
By Mugsy Peabody on 04/30/2008 1:24 pm
beverly linens
Thank you Mugsy. Bev
By beverly linens on 04/30/2008 4:56 pm
Jenny Oops
Yep, Mugsy, I, too, say Go Hillary —- GO HILLARY, FAR, FAR WAY! :):)):):)
By Jenny Oops on 04/30/2008 9:28 pm
M Morgan
No. Because everybody has made up his/her mind by now. Based on my observations, I believe that our racist country does not have the capacity to overcome its deeply rooted prejudices to elect [such a talented] “black” man or a woman as the President. That’s sad. Because, election of Obama is the only way to re-gain the pseudo-moral high ground that is lost due to the savage infringements on the rights (his atrocitic-invasions and disrespect for Constitution, privacy laws, and treaties). Pseudo-respect/moral-high-grounds, because our invasions and meddlings of our 150-years past does not deserve any degree of respect and looking-up at our country. The reason is that we as individuals have been disengaged ourselves from watching and demanding the government to be real servant of us. The utmost shame goes to the self-censoring journalists and mass media.
By M Morgan on 04/30/2008 6:21 am
Marjorie C.
If Rev. Wright would fade away, we would all soon forget about him. But, Jeremiah Wright doesn’t want this to happen. Is he hurting Obama? Yes he is. Does Wright care? Apparently not. Wright wants to keep that pot boiling because it wouldn’t be nearly as much fun if we all got along.
By Marjorie C. on 04/30/2008 6:21 am