It seems that Sarah Palin is upset because the press is treating Caroline Kennedy differently, and with less ferocity and scrutiny in reporting Caroline’s bid for Senator Clinton’s Senate seat. This complaint, of course, is based on what Palin sees as an (unfair) ‘class’ issue. After reading Palin’s complaints, I realized that there might be a bit a validity to Palin’s opinion. Yet, I confess … If there is a choice between an ‘inexperienced’ candidate with a bit of ‘class’, eloquence, and intelligence, VERSUS a candidate who has a bit of ‘spit fire’ along with the reputation of a ‘pit bull’, a pretty face, and who has a second rated education … Well … I’ll vote for CLASS hands down. Sorry Sarah. But, you will lose if you continue to point blame to anyone except yourself for how you were ‘handled’ by the press … Katie Couric, et.al. See the link below: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/01/08/palin-caroline-kennedy-ge_n_156…

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/01/08/palin-caroline-kennedy-ge_n_156… is this where you get all your ideas from…no wonder you’re all twisted up inside sarah palin has more class in her little finger nail—than anyone who would speak about her that way. poor delusional maizie…(is it dark in there)?

Sarah herself says she is low class and not in the same class as Caroline Kennedy. But to her it seems being low class is a good thing.

I don’t see this as an issue of class or grit or even experience. We need to hold our leaders to a higher intellectual and moral standard than we have been doing. The chickens are coming home to roost because of our misplaced priorities in the voting booth.

I think it will take real courage for patterson NOT TO PICK Caroline Kennedy since she has the clout do to her name and contacts. I don’t think he has the guts since he wasn’t elected either and even tho he claims to be for th people, he’s not. If he truly was for th people he’d let the people select the replacement bt them voting. So many cowards in politics today!

zera lee what kinda idiotic question is that? it was obviously a mistake on her “handlers” part—jeez—is there no learnin’ ya?

It was her mistake, her self-absorbed insensitivity expressing itself. wow…you really think this mother of 5, public servant, governor of the state of alaska is “self absorbed”—just goes to prove—you guys just “think” differently than the rest of us—more power to ya—in your small little world. oh—and thanx for all the references to all the left wing media outlets—i really don’t have the time to listen to nutjobs.

Of course he’s going to choose her. Burris. Dems always do their fake little protests, then capitulate. (This is the issue I have with Daschle - all bark, no bite.) Might even be part of a master plan - does anyone think the ousting of that hypocrite Spitzer for the adulterer Paterson was serendipity? Speaking of hypocrites - the Obama supporters who railed against Hillary calling her part of a dynasty, are the same ones now cheering on Kennedy, who has no political chops. No time as a mayor, a city council member, a congresswoman, nada. My take on her sudden curious need to be in the senate? She is being placed there by the family to keep an eye on Teddy. Back him up, shield, protect the legacy, stay close.