Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Question of the Day | 11/20/2008 11:00 pm

Are you interested in reading Laura Bush's upcoming autobiography? Why or why not?

© Shutterstock
Joan Ganz Cooney

Joan Ganz Cooney | 11/21/2008 12:00 am

Laura Bush to Tell All? Not According to Joan Ganz Cooney

No. She does not interest me at all. She is the most guarded person I’ve ever met and would not dream of writing what she really thinks about anything or anyone, starting with her husband.
Marlo Thomas

Marlo Thomas | 11/20/2008 11:00 pm

Marlo Thomas: Mr. Bush Is Bad for Laura's Book Sales

Laura Bush wrote an essay in one of my books, and I was happy to discover that she’s a pretty earthy woman. Her story was about one of her earliest memories of lying on a blanket with her mother on their front lawn, looking up at the sky. "And what a sky it was," she wrote. "Mother knew some of the constellations, and she would point them out to me. But mostly we would just gaze up and talk." She carried on that tradition of enjoying the galaxy with her own daughters years later. That gave me a peek into what seems a very good woman and mother. Still, I probably won’t read her book. I’m really not interested in hearing one word more about HIM.
Liz Smith

Liz Smith | 11/20/2008 11:00 pm

Liz Smith Warns Michelle Obama: 'The Wives of Presidents Have a Tough Row to Hoe'

Of course, I am interested in reading Laura Bush’s autobiography. I am interested in anything Mrs. Bush does because she seems to be one of the rare members of the Bush dynasty with great common sense. I even read the novel written about her, American Wife, and I liked her better and better after that. Mrs. Bush is a driving force behind the Texas Book Festival. I think she is a  wonderful woman who married a man she loves, but of whom she sometimes disapproves.  The wives of presidents have a tough row to hoe. She did well in her attitude of disengagement from the negatives. Mrs. Bush’s favorite thing other than reading is to hang out with her Texas girlfriends. This shows an excellent realistic take on life. 

Click here on this text to read my New York Post column.

Sheila Nevins

Sheila Nevins | 11/21/2008 9:00 am

Sheila Nevins Wants Only the Deepest, Darkest Truths

Under Sodium Pentothal or any truth drug, I would want to delve deeply into her sub-conscience. Be this truth serum is not the impetus for the novel; I would not want to read it. It’s her deepest darkest secrets that interest me.

Julia Reed

Julia Reed | 11/21/2008 11:55 am

Julia Reed: Laura Bush Has a Thankless Job

Yes, I’m interested in reading Laura Bush’s autobiography. She’s a lovely, strong, interesting woman who handled a thankless job incredibly well. I also don’t think she’s been given enough credit for some of her activities while in office. She has done far more than read to grade-school children. She has actively supported the people of Burma, speaking out against the prolonged detainment of Aung San Suu Kyi and protesting the treatment of peaceful protesters by the ruling junta. She has urged the international community not to buy Burmese gemstones — which prop up the regime — and has visited the refugee camps on the Thai-Burmese border. Her own private library foundation is responsible for the rebuilding and restocking of countless libraries on the Katrina-ravaged Mississippi Gulf Coast and New Orleans, where she has made 23 visits and also driven school recovery efforts. She has focused attention on two of her husband’s better ideas, the President’s Malaria Initiative (PMI), and the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), the largest international health initiative in history to fight a single disease, and has visited ten of the 15 PEPFAR focus countries and ten of the 15 countries aided by PMI.

I could go on about her work, but that’s not what makes her interesting to me. She is warm, has a great sense of humor that few have seen and has a core group of good friends she has known since childhood and to whom she is extraordinarily close and supportive. The first time I did a story on her for Newsweek when she was still First Lady of Texas, we went to lunch with two of these women and I had a blast. They were as bright and warm and hilarious as she is. Every year they take a trip together and go hiking in some national park or whitewater rafting, which I don’t think most people can imagine her doing. 

Also, no matter what you think of the administration, it’s important to have a record of people’s time in the White House. I was at lunch at the White House about three weeks ago. There were some writers like me, some historians, Cokie Roberts, Dee Myers. It was very relaxed and we sat around in the exquisitely restored Green Room downstairs, where she has hung some beautiful 20th-century works of art, and one of the historians urged her to write her memoirs because, he said, the president’s and First Lady’s official papers aren’t released for years, and it is vital for them to put down in their own words their experiences.

Further, it is absurd to transfer the feelings one might have about the president to his wife — or to be rude to her because of him. Once, about two years ago, I had dinner with Mrs. Bush and two other women at Galatoire’s in New Orleans. She had instructed the Secret Service to hang back as she just wanted to relax and have a few laughs before getting up at dawn to go to some schools along the Gulf Coast. And we had barely sat down before the parade started. A man came up and told her that he wished her husband would be tortured like they tortured the prisoners at Abu Graib. It went on and on. When one guy came by and told her that while he thought the president was a monster, he had always liked her, she waited until he had walked off and looked at me and said, "And that’s supposed to make me feel better?" I was embarrassed to my core for my city — hell, for my fellow man. I have enormous respect for her and now I would love to hear what she has to say.

183 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Lori F.
This comment has been deleted as it violated the Ten Commandments of Posting on our website.
By Lori F. on 11/23/2008 6:53 am
HA BIBI
This is again typical liberal crap refusing to see the “big picture”! By Lori F. on 11/23/2008 7:53 am Right on Lori, That’s the “NORM” for them, “Refusing to see the “WHOLE” picture!
By HA BIBI on 11/23/2008 10:35 am
Delete This
Rep. Tom Davis (R) “The GOP BRAND IS IN THE TRASH CAN…if we were dog food, they would take us off the shelf.” Senator “Widestance” Larry Craig arrested for husseling men in airport bathrooms, Felon Ted Stevens, Senator David “I love prostitutes” Vitter, Mark “I heart male interns” Foley…..Dusty Faggo—CIA/GOP operative in jail along with pals Rep. Randy “Duke” Cunningham, Republican Lobbyist Jack Abramoff, former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay criminal trial crawls on, Dick Cheney and Alberto “I don’t recall” indicted. The only intelligent GOP Senator is quitting. Chuck Hagel called today’s mindset “The Know Nothings” who don’t think and get their ‘facts’ from Rush/Ann Coulter et al. Hopefully, Senator Hagel will be in the Obama Administration….. where people are admired for their ability to reason and think. “Refusing to see the “WHOLE” picture!”——Republican Dittoheads.
By Delete This on 11/23/2008 11:44 am
HA BIBI
You forgot to mention all the “LIBERAL LOSERS” you subscribe to.
By HA BIBI on 11/23/2008 12:11 pm
Delete This
Iraq Resolution Votes: House of Representatives Republican Yes-215 No- 6 Democratic Yes- 82No-126 TOTALS Yes-297 No-33 61% of 208 Democratic Representatives voted against the resolution. In the United States Senate Republicans Yes- 48 No- 1 Democratic Yes-29 No- 21 Independant No-1 TOTALS Yes- 77 No-23 42% of Democratic Senators voted No CONGRESS WAS NOT GIVEN TIME TO READ THE MASSIVEREPORTBEFORE THE VOTE. WHILE THE INSANE RIGHT WING PRESS LOUDLY BEAT THE DRUMS OF WAR…..WITH ALL MEMBERS ON THE NEWS USING SCARE TACTICSMUSHROOM CLOUDSAND THE RIGHT WING NUTS CALLING ANYONE WHO SPOKE OUT AND TRIED TO SAVE THIS COUNTRY FROM A DISASTERCOWARDS’ ‘CUT AND RUNNERSAMERICA HATERS. Despite that….tens of millions with working brains protested around the country and the world trying to prevent this major debacle…..that anyone with a working brain could see was a lie. The arguments used to justify the invasion of Iraq —WMD and and active links to al Qaeda — have been found to be lies. There is no dispute that Hussein was not involved in the September 11th attacks. The BBC News, The Christian Science Monitor, the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Institute for Public Accuracy, and Media Matters for America all contend that Bush Inc continually mislead the public regarding an alledged link between Saddam Hussein and the attacks. THE EXPERTS CIA, DEFENSE, MILTARY, CONGRESSIONAL REPRESENTATIVES, WMD EXPERTS, MIDDLE EAST DIPLOMATS, ETC TELL THE WHOLE TRUTH ABOUT THE IRAQ WAR: PART I: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b7UmUomUX4g PART II: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7hc0WDaCqc8&feature=related PART III: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wi6K9WYPJ5U&feature=related Bush supporters are loathsome. Not only supporting a disasterous, monsterously inhuman, illegal, immoral phony war…..but then continuing to support these GOP war profiteering thugs. Bush supporters have blood on their hands, no brains, no sense, and less humanity.
By Delete This on 11/23/2008 12:18 pm
Susan B
Joan, I also read ALICE, and found her story absolutely fascinating. She was a woman of her time, and yet not of it all! Still — and this is not typical for me — I found the book to be way too long and detailed. By the last page, I felt as if it had taken me an entire lifetime to read it! It did give me marvelous insights into her father, who is one of my favorite presidents. A good time-travel book back to a fascinating era.
By Susan B on 11/22/2008 5:07 pm
joan larsen
Susan, I read like books are going out of style - which libraries say they are not. Circulation is up, up, up — which is good news. I review and when I recommended ALICE a month or so ago also, I didn’t say it was very long because once in a while, some of us are able to forget the length because we are so caught into - in this case, Alice Roosevelt Longworth - and the incredibile times of the almost century she lived in. Frankly, in government or out, I have not been able to come up with someone of her ilk. I think of her as “me” and then some. The way we carry on about infidelity in our “modern times”, you would think that this was not done - with even more vigor and long skirts to boot - back in 1900 and beyond. I found Alice’s long long love affair (with child) with Senator Borah while married — and how they carried it on with their secret symbols that I will never forget. Letters were filled with the word “HELLO” which, secret to them, meant I love you. And from the number of HELLOs, I was caught up in what seemed a wonderful though illicit romance (which was also being carried on by Alice’s husband for the whole marriage). She was an inspiration to me — not missing a beat in the political scene — sitting in the Senate balcony to not miss a word, and then be the center of every party as she knew all that could be told — and much more that couldn’t. WHAT a woman! If you haven’t read her father’s book RIVER OF DOUBT - TR ROOSEVELT’S DARKEST JOURNEY as he faced death on a trip to the worst of the Amazon River, do read it. Like daughter, like father — he too had guts to spare. I wish WOW would give me a column as the bookstores are filled with trivial books, read in any evening and forgotten, and more often than not, the ones that stick with you are not played up. If we aren’t under 40, the book covers look like we are past our prime —- and if people only knew, WE HAVE JUST BEGUN. And ALICE was still going strong at 90 — what an inspiration!
By joan larsen on 11/22/2008 5:38 pm
Frannie Em
Joan and Susan Thanks for the introduction to another fascinating sounding book. I will have to check it out. I agree that when you go into a bookstore and see all the trivial books where the book covers “look like we are past our prime”. Not me. Many of those I am not interested in because the basic themes were part of my life years ago. I learned it, I got it a long time ago, and I have already lived it, maybe there is some sweetness and poignancy in the way they say it, but there isn’t much new. When “The Devil Wears Prada” came out I was going on a long road trip and someone gave me the audio version for pleasure listening. In my late 20’s I had jobs like that and it was like reliving all the baloney. No thank you. Cute, but not that much substance, been there done that without Blackberries and cell phones. So there was constant stopping while out to check back with boss. In some ways, it made the job 10 times harder. (Loved the clothes in the movie, also Meryl Streep was amazing.) Thanks for another great review.
By Frannie Em on 11/23/2008 3:00 pm
Diana T
I remember Alice Roosevelt Longworth; there was nothing boring about her up until the day she died. A spiffy, spirited and outspoken woman; they don’t make them like that anymore. But, as for Laura, I have always liked her in a benign sort of way; I think I’ll pass on the autobiography, though. My book queue is long enough now.
By Diana T on 11/21/2008 12:32 am
f p
Yep
By f p on 11/21/2008 4:58 am
beth willis
Yes, Diana, I believe it was Alice Roosevelt Longworth who said, “If you can’t say anything nice about someone, come right over here and sit next to me.” Peace and grace
By beth willis on 11/21/2008 9:24 am
Delete This
ARL also told the truth and lived her own truth. She was authentic, stylish, witty and intelligent. Laura Bush is none of those things and someone who stands with and defends and support what she does is a moral cypher.
By Delete This on 11/21/2008 10:14 am
Diana T
As I remember her, Suzanne, Alice was so small as to be sparrow-like. And, I hear she liked her high balls, too. The one thing I remember about Laura Bush is her outfit she wore at the second inauguration; I’ll never forget it, and it ranks as one of the top 10 outfits I ever saw a first lady wear. It was a winter-white cashmere ensemble(remember when they were called that?), a simple, but exquisitely detailed coat and dress. http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/english/doc/2005-01/20/xin_2301022009393841…
By Diana T on 11/21/2008 10:26 am
C jay
and, Diana?
By C jay on 11/21/2008 11:48 am
Susan B
I agree, she looks lovely in that outfit. I can’t help myself, I’m still inclined to cut Laura Bush some slack. Who are any of us to judge her and her marriage to W? We’re not inside that marriage, not even close. We don’t know squat. But, my gut tells me that she’s “riding it out” in the best way and with the most grace she can muster. To do otherwise would only bring more disgrace down on the office and to our country. If WE think he’s awful, she undoubtedly could put a much finer point on that opinion. I want to read what she has to say. Imagine being the wife of one of the most disliked and derrided men in the world. She has quite a life experience to recount.
By Susan B on 11/23/2008 12:24 am