Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Question of the Day | 02/29/2008 12:05 am

What woman should have run for the presidency?

© Shutterstock

112 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Candice Bergen
What’s wrong with Hillary as a candidate? Come on. She is just wonderfully qualified and laser smart. But if we’re concerned about electability…..then, Oprah. Of course, it’d be a steep step down for her and a helluva pay cut but she’d be fantastic With Gayle King as Chief of Staff.
By Candice Bergen on 02/21/2008 9:33 pm
Joan Juliet Buck
Chelsea Clinton.
By Joan Juliet Buck on 02/23/2008 9:34 pm
Julia Reed
It is embarrassing — or, perhaps, telling — that I cannot think of anyone, but suffice it to say it would not be Geena Davis, who played one, badly, on TV. I am a huge fan of both Abigail Adams and Dolly Madison. They couldn’t vote, much less run, but they were virtual presidents anyway.
By Julia Reed on 02/24/2008 9:36 pm
Sheila Nevins
Golda Meir.
By Sheila Nevins on 02/25/2008 9:37 pm
Liz Smith
Either the late Governor of Texas, Ann Richards, or the late star of stars, Katharine Hepburn. They’d have kicked some stuff in the White House!
By Liz Smith on 02/26/2008 9:38 pm
Joan Ganz Cooney
No Amercan woman of my lifetime comes to mind. Margaret Thatcher is the type who might have been elected in the U.S.,but we really haven’t had such a woman in politics that I can think of. Part of it, I’m sure, is conditioning. But there it is.
By Joan Ganz Cooney on 02/23/2008 8:52 am
Judith Martin
One with a husband, hair, and wardrobe that would meet the mysterious but apparently crucial and exacting demands of the American public.
By Judith Martin on 02/27/2008 9:05 am
Lesley Stahl
I’m just reading “The Nine” by Jeffrey Toobin about the Supreme Court, which brings to mind Sandra Day O’Connor. She is smart and serious, with a healthy temperament; she’s authentic and political; and she has demonstrated a capacity to grow, and a strong desire to fight extremism.
By Lesley Stahl on 02/29/2008 10:08 am
Lily Tomlin

I agree with Candice, re: Hillary. I can guarantee whoever the woman might be, she would face the same misogyny as Hillary has — including, but not limited to, the internet boy’s club, "Citizens United Not Timid;" the McCain campaign’s, "How are we going to stop the bitch?" and even the puny and adolescent "Nut Cracker." Love Peggy’s notion about Elizabeth I. But, even the Virgin Queen would be marketed as a nut-cracking gizmo designed to lift her own royal dress for proper pecan placement.

If Ann Richards were alive, she’d be the best. Nothing would get past her. She was too big, brainy and too funny. Too down to earth. Unflappable. Wildly and creatively pragmatic. World class charismatic. Way charming. If you can handle the good ol’ boys in the Texas State House, you can handle the crackers AND the nuts. And, good god, she would’ve been so much fun for the spirit of our country and likely the world. Talk about Obama being inspiring! If we’d had the good fortune of knowing President Richards, Ann would, as Liz said, "kick some stuff in the White House." I picture her every morning appearing in the Oval Office doorway and singing out, "Isn’t it wonderful?" and it would be.

I’m still hanging in there for Hillary.

By Lily Tomlin on 02/29/2008 12:00 am
Peggy Noonan
Since we are not limiting ourselves to people who are alive, then how about that tough little cookie, Elizabeth I of England? She was a natural executive, had her father’s flair if not his dismal self-indulgences, had a keen rhetorical sense — “I am but a poor woman, but I’ve the heart and belly of a king” — and was not romantic about history. That is, she was not looking for trouble. She had a lot of trouble, and knew you don’t have to look for it, it will find you. An American president who wants to face the problems we actually have, and not look for stirring new adventures, might be just right right now.
By Peggy Noonan on 02/26/2008 11:25 pm
Paula Plays
I’m hanging in for Hillary too, and Judith Martin’s answer made me fall down laughing. Great stuff! I have a thing for Madonna as president. She’d not take any crap, the government would turn into a money-making machine AND the parties would be righteous.
By Paula Plays on 03/08/2008 6:36 pm
Upanaway
Ann was far too brilliant for “DC,” in fact she once told me “It boggles the mind…Never!” Hillary’s just fine, for now, but she’ll have to cope with the PNAC group…no one knows what is really going on, but Hillary right now, and that puts her light moons ahead of those who have eyes but cannot see, ears but do not hear, etc. Can we lease out Cheney’s residence to Bill?
By Upanaway on 03/18/2008 5:24 pm
Ann P.
Definitely Hillary.
By Ann P. on 03/08/2008 6:53 pm
Marylee Stanley
Dianne Feinstein was great for our city of San Franncisco. She has plenty of experience and is not pushed around by the good old boys !
By Marylee Stanley on 03/08/2008 7:38 pm
Linda Amadeus
Marge Simpson
By Linda Amadeus on 03/08/2008 9:17 pm