Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Question of the Day | 08/18/2008 12:00 am

Who would you like to see John McCain choose for his vice-presidential running mate?

John McCain
© AP
Whoopi Goldberg

Whoopi Goldberg | 08/18/2008 12:00 am

Whoopi's Wish for McCain's Running Mate

I would like to see John McCain pick Michael Bloomberg or Bill Richardson.
Joan Ganz Cooney

Joan Ganz Cooney | 08/18/2008 12:00 am

Joan Ganz Cooney Can Only Hope

I haven’t given this any thought and only hope he chooses someone who doesn’t add strength to the ticket.
Liz Smith

Liz Smith | 08/18/2008 12:00 am

Liz Smith: Paris Hilton for Vice President!

Definitely Paris Hilton. She has already shown us she’s not just another pretty face. She has political moxie if you’ve seen her ad. And as I think his campaign has had all the makings of total farce, what’s one more extravagant nothing?

Click here on this text here to read my nationally syndicated daily column.
Mary Wells

Mary Wells | 08/18/2008 12:00 am

Mary Wells Is No Help to John McCain

I don’t have a favorite for John McCain. I am inspecting all the states and am not sold yet. I bet both he and Obama stay up nights twisting and turning and grinding their teeth on this question.

419 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Frannie Em
James, Do you really think that Warren, ( who claims to be an independent and somewhat undecided) would give one of them the questions and not the other. Doesn’t fly for me. They were very predictable questions.
By Frannie Em on 08/19/2008 12:51 am
James the Game
It’s possible Rick Warren wasn’t the only one with the question list. But, what’s done is done. It was a good tune-up for both candidates heading into the debate season. Cheers.
By James the Game on 08/19/2008 1:03 am
DeBúrca obj
James and Frannie, I posted this in response to CO on this subject but would like to share it with you (sorry for the length): I heard one commentators opinion on the Saddleback Church interview, “Obama did good and McCain did great.” Considering the forum, I’m satisfied with that. Obama doesn’t have to do “great” on every forum and I really hand it to Obama for venturing into a forum most Democrats avoid and for sitting in front of that Evangelical audience and stating honestly that he is “pro-choice”. I think Obamas responses were thoughtful and genuine and if they weren’t slick enough, that’s ok, I know that doesn’t always play out well in that type of setting, but as president, that isn’t what is really required. Also, I think Obama’s gave a wonderful answer after the question… Does evil exist and, if it does, do we ignore it, do we negotiate with it, do we contain it, or do we defeat it? OBAMA: “Evil does exist. I mean, I think we see evil all the time. We see evil in Darfur. We see evil sadly on the streets of our cities. We see evil in parents who viciously abuse their children. And I think it has to be confronted. It has to be confronted squarely. And one of the things that I strongly believe is that, you know, we are not going to, as individuals, be able to erase evil from the world. That is God’s task. But we can be soldiers in that process. And we can confront it when we see it. Now, the one thing that I think is very important is for us to have some humility in how we approach the issue of confronting evil. Because, you know, a lot of evil’s been perpetrated based on the claim that we were trying to confront evil.” Here is an analysis of Obama’s purpose for being there: The point is, Obama’s goal was not to win over everyone in the crowd, it was to start the process of changing the view of Democrats and religion. During the Gore/Kerry runs, it was almost as if Democrats tried to run away from religion. The damage that was done from the past few years is not going to be erased by Obama alone, but participating in stuff like this starts the process of recovery. That was the point. That opens the door for some religious people who value things like healthcare, getting out of Iraq, etc. to say, “well, Obama seems like a good Christian, plus I agree with him on these other things.” Obviously a big chunk of Evangelicals will not vote for Obama because he is pro-choice, but not all of them.
By DeBúrca obj on 08/19/2008 6:13 pm
Frannie Em
De Burca Thank you for your honest and even post. Did you read any of my earlier posts with Frank, I think I gave Obama a favorable response. Many times the obvious is not interesting for me to state such as that it was an evangelical crowd who would not be in favor of Obama’s pro choice stance. I watched the interviews so I know what each one said and I thought they both did well, which was not surprising to me. Interesting point in your last paragraph, I kind of figured that was the goal. Smart move. Kerry avoided many spots to talk because he thought they wouldn’t bring votes, just as Republicans did with groups they didn’t think they could win votes. I also said in my conversation with Frank that it seemed like Obama had Evangelical constituents in the audience by their response to some of his points. It is an interesting race.
By Frannie Em on 08/19/2008 11:17 pm
sibelle daubigne
Marjorie, you are totally right Mc Cain did better! Obama’s “Christ died for my sins” was the cherry on top of the hope!
By sibelle daubigne on 08/18/2008 6:19 pm
Marjorie C.
sibelle: “…the cherry on top of the hope!” LOL. LOL. LOL. Sibelle, you’re on a roll !!!
By Marjorie C. on 08/20/2008 4:08 pm
No Way-No How -No McCain
Plus he doesn’t know how to use the “Internets.”
By No Way-No How -No McCain on 08/18/2008 3:43 am
Frank Peterson
Suzanne: he has difficulty using a computer to begin with let alone the inner tubes ;-)
By Frank Peterson on 08/18/2008 3:57 am
James the Game
I agree, Frank, but I don’t blame it on age. Seventy-two’s not that old, anymore. It’s just obvious that McCain’s the type of guy who sees things only in black and white, details be darned.
By James the Game on 08/18/2008 4:24 am
Dona Howlett
McCains the kind of guy who say’s………Dont try to change my ideas with the facts……..I have my mine made up.
By Dona Howlett on 08/18/2008 3:49 pm
Dona Howlett
The word is MIND…….sorry
By Dona Howlett on 08/18/2008 4:03 pm
DeBúrca obj
Dona…. sounds an awful lot like W doesn’t it??
By DeBúrca obj on 08/19/2008 6:16 pm
Dona Howlett
Yep!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! came out of the same box. What we don’t need is another 4 or 8 years of that kind of administration. Talk about being flushed down the toilet………..I prefer another ride.
By Dona Howlett on 08/19/2008 7:11 pm
Elizabeth Bennett
I agree that McCain is not that bright, and also that it is not due to his age. He was a D student at Annapolis, close to the bottom of the class. While a pilot for the Navy, he lost five Navy aircraft, after being a poor student in flight school. Four were lost in accidents and one in combat. http://newsgroups.derkeiler.com/Archive/Alt/alt.home.repair/2008-05/msg0… http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_McCain It is a wonder he survived. After he was home from being a POW, he worked in the Pentagon when Carter was president. However, he maneuvered politically behind Carter’s back to get funding for a new supercarrier that the Carter administration opposed. That always struck me as strange, that he was not deprived of his commission on the spot for that. As a Senator he was sanctioned for poor judgment in the Keating Five affair. While he sometimes meant well, he often goofed, as in his support of the Line Item Veto Act, which the Supreme Court found unconstitutional. Someone send this guy a copy of the Constitution! His bad temper is legendary. Whoever he chooses for Veep, it is likely to be someone smarter than him and more even-tempered, as McCain is so far to the extreme on both of this issues. I also worry about his bout with melanoma. So I do not think it is his age; he has always been a dumb guy, who maybe drank too much, mouthed off too much and succeeded in spite of himself—or because of the success of his father. Sounds a lot like Bush.
By Elizabeth Bennett on 08/18/2008 6:58 pm
Star Lawrence
Really? I thought he did a pretty fine job at that Warren Obama love-in fest. And, I am not even sure I am voting for him yet. Are you a mental health professional or geratrician? But—to be fair—I don’t really care who he picks any more than I care who the other one picks.
By Star Lawrence on 08/18/2008 10:41 am