A Friend Stopped By | 07/13/2009 12:00 am
How My Decision About a Late-Term Abortion Affected My Marriage, by Alice Eve Cohen

Janet Charles Photography
Editor’s Note: Alice Eve Cohen is the author of What I Thought I Knew, just published by Viking. A solo theater artist and playwright, she is the recipient of a grant from the National Endowment for the Arts, and is a teacher at the New School in New York City.
Ten years ago, Michael and I had an emotional turning point that nearly jeopardized our marriage. I was 44, he was 34, and we were engaged. I was facing the terrifying possibility of a late-term abortion, with one week to decide.
When I was 30, I was diagnosed as infertile. My doctor told me that I could never get pregnant naturally, and strongly cautioned me not to attempt pregnancy with fertility treatment, as I would never be able to carry a baby past six months. So at age 44, when I started to feel sick, my various doctors attributed my ailments to early menopause and other conditions related to aging. Six months, numerous X-rays, CAT scans, prescription hormones and a slew of doctors later, I was raced to an emergency CAT scan for a large abdominal tumor — which turned out not to be a tumor at all. I was six months pregnant.
| I desperately didn't want to have this baby, and I hated myself for not wanting it. |
I’d had no prenatal care, the fetus had been subjected to six months of tests and treatments, which were known to cause birth defects and other injuries, and I had every reason to believe that the baby would suffer further debilitating injury from premature birth. I wanted to terminate the pregnancy, but at 24 weeks, said my doctor, it was too late for an abortion in New York State.
I desperately didn’t want to have this baby, and I hated myself for not wanting it. I had been unhappy before, but I had never thought about killing myself. Now I began to think of suicide as my way out: the only way to end the pregnancy, and the best solution to protect the unborn baby from a life of pain.
Michael came with me to see an abortion specialist. "Since you’re contemplating suicide, you could have an abortion in Kansas, where, if the mother’s life is in danger, an abortion is legal up until the 28th week," he told us. "Seven days from today." At my request, he scheduled an abortion in Wichita for the following Tuesday. "Think about it for the next few days before you decide," he said. Then he turned to Michael. "What do you think about all this?"
"Me? Oh, Jesus … a lot of different things," Michael answered. "I’ve seen Alice in the throes of this terrible unhappiness, and I don’t recognize her. I’ve been politically in favor of choice, but uncommitted on the personal side — it’s been an abstraction. But now that this is suddenly so real, all I can think is that there’s a baby. Our baby. My baby. And I can’t stand the thought of this baby being aborted. So If Alice has an abortion, I won’t go to Wichita with her. And I might not be here when she gets back. I’ll have my own unbearable sorrow about losing this baby, about endorsing this decision. But I don’t want Alice to kill herself. So she should do what she needs to do."
I spent the week wrestling with this impossible decision. On the day before I was scheduled to fly to Wichita, Michael begged me not to have the abortion. "I’ve already decided to have the baby," I said. Michael thanked me and burst into tears.
For the past ten years, this turning point moment in our relationship — Michael acknowledging my right to choose, but telling me he might leave me if I had the abortion — has remained a largely unspoken but crucial shared memory, equal parts rift and bridge between us.























367 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
",,,,this country is stunted emotionally".
Have you considered moving?
every day when i see idiots opposing equal rights.
but then i realize - this is my country too. why should the morons get all the say?
It has been said before, but if men got pregnant abortion would be a sacrament. And further, I think it would popularized on TV just like Viva Viagra! We have a long way to go before we see Viva Vagina! If such a thing is even imaginable, we are supposed to laugh at that and not take it seriously because it is a women’s issue. Viagra is covered by medical insurance. I know of nothing which enables women to have orgasms as being covered by medical insurance.
And thus abortion, which does not equate in the world today of men as do orgasms (though of course men’s orgasms are sanctioned by medical insurance), is still a "women’s issue" and as such will continue to be wrought with guilt and responsibilities…on women. And this in a world that still does not pay women equal wages to men. Yet we are to have the pregnanacy to full term. Then if the man opts out, he will take off for parts unknown, leaving the underpaid woman to support the "family." This has happened time and time again and will continue for some time. This is all of particular significance to low-income women who are often (though not always) also undereducated and unaware of the guilt being imposed on them to take on full responsibility for a the effects of a man’s lust by supplying often the complete financial burdeon of all.
We need to stop with the guilt and start equalizing the playing field more. As President Obama has advocated, women need encouragement to become educated. (Though there are plenty of well-educated, yet under paid women so education alone is not the only issue, equality in the job market/financial world needs to happen!) When we advocate for an equal playing field, women will begin to receive more power and thus not allow men to dominate in the bedroom. They will learn to take responsibility of conception seriously and guard their sacred womb with great diligence, not giving in to any old whim. They will teach this idea of women’s importance and the sacredness of conception to both their daughters and their sons. This will result also in less rapes.
And with regard to doctors not finding out the woman was pregnant, that is still going on! That is because women are not being listened to and are taught to ignore their own thoughts and feelings as unimportant. These doctors, today, that continue to exhibit this sexism are now just as often women as well as men. We continue to live in a patriarchial society which focuses on the needs and wants of men, especially rich men, of every background and color. You cannot make a racial remark without serious punishment as we have seen in the media in recent years. But anyone can put down women without penalty! And that includes other sexist, patrifocal women. Medicine is very much a part of our patriarchial society. Holistic medicine, a part of perhaps all if not most ancient societies, has been laughed at and ignored. However, as more people, male and female, begin to realize that they will never be completely happy and will never be in the complete know, until they begin to look at things holistically. Holistic philosophies are more eqalitarian and thus less patriarchial. Our world is in the midst of transforming to a holistic model. I have been devoted educating myself in this and providing others with ideas of holistic living. For more information, check out my blog at: http://greanwitch.spaces.live/blog
L
The blog address I gave was incorrect. THE CORRECT BLOG ADRESS is: http://greanwitch.spaces.live.com/blog
I am still amazed at the number of doctors who will tell an ill woman to ‘relax’, ‘eat better’ or ‘stop imagining she is sick’. Has happened to me and my friends. Oh, correction … they didn’t tell me they told my bf ‘Dear Bob please know that Sara is not really sick, she just gets up in the morning and magically causes XYZ problem. Your loving doctor’
I think you said that well, Deena. You are right, in my opinion, that someone has to have the final say. I think that is something both men and women should clearly understand in their hearts and minds before engaging in intimacy. The biggest problem I see in many of these stories about abortion is that the man and the woman involved did not choose to use birth control when they knew good and well that the did not want a child. I think that is beyond foolish.
"The doctor(s) said I wouldn’t ever be able to carry a baby full-term" does not equal birth control. Women and men who were told they were infertile/sterile have had babies for hundreds of years, surprising doctors and themselves. About the only circumstances you can put 98% faith in are tubal ligations and vasectomies (and even then…).
I do not think you are wrong either about some of the harsh comments against men on this board. For some reason, many women seem to find it mutually exclusive to consider their partner’s feelings while living as a liberated woman. Being your own person does not mean partner-be-damned, it’s your life. It means bringing together two people with minds, spirits, and a will. The essence of a good relationship is always going to be cooperation and compromise. However, if you know there may be an issue you cannot compromise on—-say an unwanted pregnancy—then you must prevent it together. Despite what women like to believe, we don’t make those babies alone, and loving partners have the right to be heard too. Don’t want to give him a moment’s opinion? Then fix it so it doesn’t happen. That’s where the issue really is—prevention.
Awesome post AR…you took the words right out of my mouth. My husband and I knew, after our last child, that we did not want any more. So we looked into the options, and decided that I would have my tubes tied (I was already having a c-section, so we just had them do that at the same time). The point is, we made the decision AS A COUPLE…we discussed it, looked into it, and made it together, which is what people in a committed relationship/marriage SHOULD do…not just leave things like that to chance.