Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

A Friend Stopped By | 07/13/2009 12:00 am

How My Decision About a Late-Term Abortion Affected My Marriage, by Alice Eve Cohen

The author of the searing new memoir What I Thought I Knew speaks about the most important decision she ever made.
By Alice Eve Cohen
Alice Eve Cohen

Janet Charles Photography

Editor’s Note: Alice Eve Cohen is the author of What I Thought I Knew, just published by Viking. A solo theater artist and playwright, she is the recipient of a grant from the National Endowment for the Arts, and is a teacher at the New School in New York City.

Ten years ago, Michael and I had an emotional turning point that nearly jeopardized our marriage. I was 44, he was 34, and we were engaged. I was facing the terrifying possibility of a late-term abortion, with one week to decide.

When I was 30, I was diagnosed as infertile. My doctor told me that I could never get pregnant naturally, and strongly cautioned me not to attempt pregnancy with fertility treatment, as I would never be able to carry a baby past six months. So at age 44, when I started to feel sick, my various doctors attributed my ailments to early menopause and other conditions related to aging. Six months, numerous X-rays, CAT scans, prescription hormones and a slew of doctors later, I was raced to an emergency CAT scan for a large abdominal tumor — which turned out not to be a tumor at all. I was six months pregnant.

I desperately didn't want to have this baby, and I hated myself for not wanting it.

I’d had no prenatal care, the fetus had been subjected to six months of tests and treatments, which were known to cause birth defects and other injuries, and I had every reason to believe that the baby would suffer further debilitating injury from premature birth. I wanted to terminate the pregnancy, but at 24 weeks, said my doctor, it was too late for an abortion in New York State.

I desperately didn’t want to have this baby, and I hated myself for not wanting it. I had been unhappy before, but I had never thought about killing myself. Now I began to think of suicide as my way out: the only way to end the pregnancy, and the best solution to protect the unborn baby from a life of pain.

Michael came with me to see an abortion specialist. "Since you’re contemplating suicide, you could have an abortion in Kansas, where, if the mother’s life is in danger, an abortion is legal up until the 28th week," he told us. "Seven days from today." At my request, he scheduled an abortion in Wichita for the following Tuesday. "Think about it for the next few days before you decide," he said. Then he turned to Michael. "What do you think about all this?"

"Me? Oh, Jesus … a lot of different things," Michael answered. "I’ve seen Alice in the throes of this terrible unhappiness, and I don’t recognize her. I’ve been politically in favor of choice, but uncommitted on the personal side — it’s been an abstraction. But now that this is suddenly so real, all I can think is that there’s a baby. Our baby. My baby. And I can’t stand the thought of this baby being aborted. So If Alice has an abortion, I won’t go to Wichita with her. And I might not be here when she gets back. I’ll have my own unbearable sorrow about losing this baby, about endorsing this decision. But I don’t want Alice to kill herself. So she should do what she needs to do."

I spent the week wrestling with this impossible decision. On the day before I was scheduled to fly to Wichita, Michael begged me not to have the abortion. "I’ve already decided to have the baby," I said. Michael thanked me and burst into tears.

For the past ten years, this turning point moment in our relationship — Michael acknowledging my right to choose, but telling me he might leave me if I had the abortion — has remained a largely unspoken but crucial shared memory, equal parts rift and bridge between us.

367 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Pdr de
Regarding the subject of letting the mother die if it’s a choice between saving the baby or the mother, am I correct in recollecting that the Catholic church favors the life of the child over that of the mother?
By Pdr de on 07/15/2009 4:24 am
Rachel F
That’s a good choice, and, to be honest, I don’t know the answer (although I wouldn’t be surprised if it was their position, at least at some point).
By Rachel F on 07/15/2009 7:49 am
Rachel F
err, choice should read "question"…lol…brain is on vacation this morning. ;)
By Rachel F on 07/15/2009 7:58 am
Messy ONE

It’s not fallacious, and it is NOT lazy. The New York Supreme Court decided this back in the early 90s, and the decision was so emphatically against the putative father that no one else has bothered to try it again. No one, that is NO ONE has the right to make decisions about another person’s body (Before you push this to the extreme I know you’ll go for, minor children are not included. We are only talking about adults). Period. You may not force anyone to undergo any form of medical treatment. 

 If you are going to extend to men the right to lock up women to prevent abortions (because that IS what you’re talking about when you take it to the end of your "argument"), then you give that same men the right to force their spouses or significant others to, for example, be sterilized or forced to abort a child that they want. The right to force a woman to give birth could also be extended to denying her birth control - after all, if a man wants the child, the woman is by extension obligated to incubate whatever child he decides he wants, right?

 The United States has the highest rate of both maternal and infant death in the developed world. There are a lot of reasons for that, but the bottom line is that pregnancy is a risk. It may not be for the majority of women, but there is ALWAYS a risk that something can go wrong or that a mistake will be made that will result in the death, disfigurement or permanent disability of the woman or child. 

No one has the right to ask anyone to take that risk. No one. Ever. Women have abortions for many reasons and no one has a right to judge them, especially not strangers like….you. There is one thing that is guaranteed, and Cybil Shepard said it beautifully in a speech she gave about 20 years ago. "When abortion is illegal, young women die.

 If you can live with those deaths, then good for you. Make sure you wear a sign or something so that those of us that support the human right to choose can avoid you. 

By Messy ONE on 07/13/2009 5:00 pm
Amanda C
If you are going to extend to men the right to lock up women to prevent abortions (because that IS what you’re talking about when you take it to the end of your "argument"), then you give that same men the right to force their spouses or significant others to, for example, be sterilized or forced to abort a child that they want

exactly. what about the women who WANT to have babies, but the men don’t want the kid?

do you "mens’ rights" people believe a man should be able to force these women to ABORT as well? can’t have it just one way, guys.

By Amanda C on 07/13/2009 6:00 pm
Deena B.
There is a huge difference between being forced to either abort or carry a baby to term and simply giving consideration to the feelings of your partner in life.  Then, if the two of you are not in agreement, something obviously has to give.  Someone has to have the final say.  I agree that should be the woman.  And let the chips fall where they may in the relationship.  But to not allow the father’s opinions to carry any weight whatsoever baffles me.  My husband is not my jailer.  He is my partner.  What kind of relationships do some of you people have??
By Deena B. on 07/14/2009 7:11 am
Amanda C
But to not allow the father’s opinions to carry any weight whatsoever baffles me.  My husband is not my jailer.  He is my partner.  What kind of relationships do some of you people have??

i believe we are talking about legal laws about ownership and power of authority, not relationship discussions. i’m sure most women think they should talk to their partner about what’s happening.

personally, i have no desire for pregnancy or young children and every single partner i’ve had knows that up front. there is no discussion - i will not have children and there will be no pregnancy or birth with me. if they dont like it, they know it waaay before i ever jump in the sack with them.

By Amanda C on 07/14/2009 1:52 pm
Deena B.
Amanda, that’s altogether different then.  You are having the discussion ahead of time.  Everyone knows what to expect.  If the two of you are not of one accord then it’s a deal breaker right then - before there is a relationship.  I think we are on the page here afterall.
By Deena B. on 07/14/2009 2:15 pm
Amanda C

:) i believe we are.

i would never want someone to fall for me, then realize later that he or she wants a big huge bundle of kids, and all i want is peace and quiet with my cats.

By Amanda C on 07/14/2009 3:12 pm
aud b
Amanda, when I got married, my husband agreed with me on no children.  He knew how strongly I felt about it and he supported me.  Fast forward several years later he gave me a choice, breed or leave.  I left.  I refuse to be anyones bio incubator. 
By aud b on 07/16/2009 11:00 am
Victoria J
Well  Amanda dear, that explains the lack of depth in your responses. I think you have probably made the right choice about not having children given your lack of compassion or thoughtfulness. We certainly don’t need any more crazies on the street screaming about parental neglect in early childhood.
By Victoria J on 07/25/2009 7:00 pm
Elizabeth Newman

___But to not allow the father’s opinions to carry any weight whatsoever baffles me.  My husband is not my jailer.  He is my partner.  What kind of relationships do some of you people have??___

That was my point. I truly do not understand the "anti-man" crusade that is going on here. I would ALWAYS solicit my husband’s opinion on such a matter, and would respect it. I would NEVERNEVER tell him that his opinion or wants are of no importance just because he’s a man. Nor would my husband ever demand that I get pregnant, regardless of the consequences.  That’s not to say that I would AGREE with it, but I would certainly respect it.  Yes, while the baby is in MY body, and affects my health…it’s also HIS child. It wasn’t an immaculate conception for god’s sake. Saying that men have NO rights in regards to SO’s pregnancy is taking the feminism just a bit too far, and to me smacks of the times when men had all the say…if we hate it so much, why are we essentially doing the same thing?

And before anyone twists my words….I am NOT advocating that men should be able to hold women in bondage. But I do disagree with the emasculating, anti-man tone going on here.

By Elizabeth Newman on 07/15/2009 1:09 pm
Deena B.

Agreed, Elizabeth.  If I posted that response to you, I may have done so in error.    

On another topic (the one about Sonia Sotomayor?) one poster said that any married woman would tell you that a woman would make a better decision than a man.  I said I did not know that to be necessarily true.  She replied that I was the first married woman she knew who said her husband would always make a better decision.  That, of course, is not quite what I said.  I can’t say that he would always make the best decision but, conversely, I can’t say that he would never make the best decision.  I happen to think my husband is smart and fair minded.  I wouldn’t be married to him if he was not.

By Deena B. on 07/15/2009 2:17 pm
Irish Eyes NY
Elizabeth, don’t you get it? The women on here that are doing the men bashing are lesbians. They hate men. OK?
By Irish Eyes NY on 07/15/2009 9:06 pm
Ruby Stewart

Not all women who hate men are lesbians. And not all lesbians hate men, either. We women who do the men bashing have just happened to have seen way too many incompetant, stupid, ignorant men in our lives (either personally or in the media) who deserve to be bashed. We also have men in our lives that we love dearly who also get bashed every now and then. I am about to get married to a wonderful man who I love dearly. And yet, when I met his ex-girlfriend (who is also a dear friend of his for nearly 20 years) a couple of years ago, we bashed him to no end; because, well, he just had many flaws that we both found endearing.

By Ruby Stewart on 07/17/2009 6:39 pm