A Friend Stopped By | 07/13/2009 12:00 am
How My Decision About a Late-Term Abortion Affected My Marriage, by Alice Eve Cohen

Janet Charles Photography
Editor’s Note: Alice Eve Cohen is the author of What I Thought I Knew, just published by Viking. A solo theater artist and playwright, she is the recipient of a grant from the National Endowment for the Arts, and is a teacher at the New School in New York City.
Ten years ago, Michael and I had an emotional turning point that nearly jeopardized our marriage. I was 44, he was 34, and we were engaged. I was facing the terrifying possibility of a late-term abortion, with one week to decide.
When I was 30, I was diagnosed as infertile. My doctor told me that I could never get pregnant naturally, and strongly cautioned me not to attempt pregnancy with fertility treatment, as I would never be able to carry a baby past six months. So at age 44, when I started to feel sick, my various doctors attributed my ailments to early menopause and other conditions related to aging. Six months, numerous X-rays, CAT scans, prescription hormones and a slew of doctors later, I was raced to an emergency CAT scan for a large abdominal tumor — which turned out not to be a tumor at all. I was six months pregnant.
| I desperately didn't want to have this baby, and I hated myself for not wanting it. |
I’d had no prenatal care, the fetus had been subjected to six months of tests and treatments, which were known to cause birth defects and other injuries, and I had every reason to believe that the baby would suffer further debilitating injury from premature birth. I wanted to terminate the pregnancy, but at 24 weeks, said my doctor, it was too late for an abortion in New York State.
I desperately didn’t want to have this baby, and I hated myself for not wanting it. I had been unhappy before, but I had never thought about killing myself. Now I began to think of suicide as my way out: the only way to end the pregnancy, and the best solution to protect the unborn baby from a life of pain.
Michael came with me to see an abortion specialist. "Since you’re contemplating suicide, you could have an abortion in Kansas, where, if the mother’s life is in danger, an abortion is legal up until the 28th week," he told us. "Seven days from today." At my request, he scheduled an abortion in Wichita for the following Tuesday. "Think about it for the next few days before you decide," he said. Then he turned to Michael. "What do you think about all this?"
"Me? Oh, Jesus … a lot of different things," Michael answered. "I’ve seen Alice in the throes of this terrible unhappiness, and I don’t recognize her. I’ve been politically in favor of choice, but uncommitted on the personal side — it’s been an abstraction. But now that this is suddenly so real, all I can think is that there’s a baby. Our baby. My baby. And I can’t stand the thought of this baby being aborted. So If Alice has an abortion, I won’t go to Wichita with her. And I might not be here when she gets back. I’ll have my own unbearable sorrow about losing this baby, about endorsing this decision. But I don’t want Alice to kill herself. So she should do what she needs to do."
I spent the week wrestling with this impossible decision. On the day before I was scheduled to fly to Wichita, Michael begged me not to have the abortion. "I’ve already decided to have the baby," I said. Michael thanked me and burst into tears.
For the past ten years, this turning point moment in our relationship — Michael acknowledging my right to choose, but telling me he might leave me if I had the abortion — has remained a largely unspoken but crucial shared memory, equal parts rift and bridge between us.























367 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
that isn’t even an option in court… if the father wants the child and the mother doesnt, the father has every right to take full custody of the baby and the mother has to pay child support.
the rights discussed are the rights of the woman to control her body while she is pregnant - not after birth.
Shani raises a good question.
1.Why do men and women still choose to sleep with people they would never marry when there is always the possibility of an unwanted pregnancy?
2. If its a woman’s right to choose and she chooses to have the baby, but the father wants her to abort…why does she now have the right to make the man pay for the baby which he did not want?
3. Why if the man wants the baby, but the woman carrying it gets to claim this is my body and I have the right to choose… and she chooses abortion…when fundamentally she couldn’t have gotten pregnant without the man.The baby is half his…is there any other situation, where a court of law wouldn’t find that legitimate half ownership requires a decision whereby both parties must be equally satisfied with outcome? Would that question be solved by requiring her to have the baby and hand it over to the father and to walk away with no legal rights to that child from that day forward?
4. Is our nation out of kilter and are we constantly creating laws to accomodate our own unwillingess to take on responsibility for our behavior and decisions? Is the right to choose, simply an argument which allows both men and women to sever their responsibility for poor and bad choices? If men kept their zippers zipped and women return to the figurative chasity belt, would the issue of abortion die a quick death? Are we so busy securing some of these rights, that it doesn’t dawn on us that behaviorial change makes more sense?
4. Why doesn’t the fact that you slept with this guy with full knowledge that there is always a possibility of pregnancy supercede one’s right to choose?
More often than not, the behavior defines the outcome.
Yes Andrea…you bring up a darn good point that I would encourage ALL women to consider…"what if". My mother cautioned me to "not sleep with anyone that you can not envision being married to, or the father of your children"…good stuff there…
Interestingly…86% of Americans believe in significantly restricting abortion. 53% believe that abortion does more harm than good to the woman, in the long run….
Every demographic sub group is moving towards pro-life, with the exception of non-Catholics and men under 45 (no surprise there)
Abortion through planned parenthood was initiated to control births among thoIt se that were considered "unfit" to reproduce. It comes as no surprise to me that men under 45 support a proceedure that allows them greater freedom to unprotected sex and deems the women and their babies "unfit" to marry or support.
Kelly,
I always was of the mindset that "since I’m growing the baby in my body I get to decide everything about it." Now, many years later, I see that a fair number of men ARE genuinely concerned.
I’m not sure if I’m ready to revise my belief that men have no say in the pregnancy matter. But what I AM sure of is that this points all the more towards kids [and adults] needing to be educated in that they can find themselves in this position, so they’d better think long and hard before sleeping with someone [just as you pointed out].
Gee, just think…..if people used their heads instead of their sex organs we probably wouldn’t have unwanted pregnancies and heated debates on pro-life and pro-choice wouldn’t take place.
"Gee, just think…..if people used their heads instead of their sex organs we probably wouldn’t have unwanted pregnancies and heated debates on pro-life and pro-choice wouldn’t take place. "
By Andrea Brandon on 07/13/2009 11:58 am Truer words were never said Andrea…and I might add…the only honest choice that woman has is when she "chooses" unprotected sex.Kelly,
Absolutely true.
Kelly, what is your source for these statistics? I am sincerely interested.
Peace and grace
Poll: 86 Percent of U.S. Wants Abortion Restrictions
Friday, July 10, 2009 1:45 PM
Article Font Size
The American people continue to move to the pro-life perspective on abortion according to the latest Moral Compass survey by the Knights of Columbus and Marist Poll.
The poll mirrored findings of other recent surveys, showing that more Americans identify as pro-life than as pro-choice, and that the vast majority of Americans favor restricting abortion.
Among the key findings:
Additionally, the data showed that since October nearly every demographic sub-group had moved toward the pro-life position except for non-practicing Catholics and men under 45 years of age.
Independents and liberals showed the greatest shift to the pro-life position since October, while Democrats were slightly less likely to be pro-life now than they were in October.
“The data shows that the American people are placing an ever increasing value on human life,” said Supreme Knight Carl Anderson. “Far from the great divide that most people think exists when it comes to the abortion debate, there is actually a great deal of common ground. Most Americans are unhappy with the unrestricted access to abortion that is the legacy of Roe
vs. Wade, and pundits and elected leaders should take note of the fact that agreement on abortion need not be limited to the fringes of the debate and issues like adoption or pre-natal care. The American people have reached a basic consensus, and that consensus is at odds with the unrestricted access to abortion that is the legacy of Roe.”
The survey of 1,223 Americans was conducted May 28 – 31 and has a margin of error of +/-3%.
© 2009 Newsmax. All rights reserved.
Maybe devon…just maybe…you would be better served to research then…other polls as well show that there is a move towards pro-life ….
Or of course…you may just be in agreement with Obama "Science Czar" John Holdren, author of "Ecoscience" who advocates mandatory sterilization?
I have a News Flash for you devon…being a Christian or a Catholic is not a passe as Obama would like for you to think that it is.