Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Dear Margo | 05/06/2009 11:00 pm

Dear Margo: Looking for Greener Grass

A woman is in love with two men — married to one of them, sleeping with the other … Margo Howard’s bright advice
Margo Howard

Looking for Greener Grass

Dear Margo: I’m in love with two men — married to one of them, "Jack." The other man, "Roger," I’ve known for years longer. Roger and I had a physical thing prior to my meeting Jack. At the time, I asked him to make it official and he turned me down. I’ve always had feelings for him, and they weren’t resolved when I met and married Jack. I even told Jack about it. I love my husband, and I know he loves me, but in the last year and a half we’ve started drifting apart. (We were married in 2006.) I’ve suggested counseling a few times, but he says we don’t have the money (no insurance) or the time. He says we can work it out on our own. We try, things are great for a few days, but then they slide back.
I see Roger around a lot, and he has professed his love for me numerous times. Recently, I started an affair with him, and I don’t know if he keeps coming into the picture because we were supposed to be together, or if it’s to test the strength of my bond with Jack. I don’t want to make a decision I’ll regret, but I know I’ll have to make a move one way or the other soon. Each man fulfills needs the other doesn’t. I’m sure this is how polygamist sects get started. I have no idea what to do. — In a Predicament

Dear In: Your "drift" certainly wasted no time in making an appearance, your marriage having taken place not quite three years ago. As for Roger, I don’t think he "keeps coming into the picture" because of any karmic forces; nor do I think the love gods sent him to test the strength of your bond with your husband. As I understand the Book of Mormon (well, OK, what I know from watching "Big Love"), polygamy was not developed so that different spouses could make up the perfect person. Life is choices and decisions. I suggest that you clear the playing field (i.e., end it with Roger) and concentrate on making things better with the guy you walked down the aisle with. Right now you are playing with fire. — Margo, dedicatedly

When Looking Is Just Looking

Dear Margo: Is looking at naughty videos on the Internet cheating? I recently caught my boyfriend viewing videos of women on a well-known user-posted video site. These were not pornographic, just scantily clad females performing stripteases, etc. I was very hurt and upset, but he promised he will not do this again, and I believe him. I forgave him and we’re going on with our relationship, but I’m torn about the situation because I know that men are going to look at other women, even when they’re in a relationship, and that it can be "just looking." The fact that he was actively searching for other women to view, however, bothers me still. Other than this incident, he’s never given me any reason to doubt that he loves me. (And we have an incredibly good sex life.) — Distressed in Tennessee

Dear Dis: You are right that (straight) men are going to look at other women. In a perfect world this happens when a man is out in public (and even then it’s sometimes not appreciated), but the Internet has made it easy for men to look at other women when they sit down at their computers. I don’t think your situation belongs on danger.com, however. As you say, the site was not pornographic; it was amateurs posting sexy videos, but nothing lewd. And … your fella vowed he wouldn’t do it anymore, plus there seems to be no sign of addiction. Give him a pass, stop stewing and continue with your incredibly good sex life. — Margo, attitudinally
***

Dear Margo is written by Margo Howard, Ann Landers’ daughter. All letters must be sent via e-mail to dearmargo@creators.com. Due to a high volume of e-mail, not all letters will be answered. To read more about Margo Howard, click here.

COPYRIGHT 2009 MARGO HOWARD
DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.

Every Thursday and Friday, you can find "Dear Margo" and her latest words of wisdom on our home page at www.wowowow.com. Or better yet, click to sign up for an instant email alert that will send a message right to your in-box every time a new "Dear Margo" column is posted on wowOwow. Just click here for instant sign up.

Click here for all "Dear Margo" columns.

Got a question for "Dear Margo?" Send via e-mail to dearmargo@creators.com.

 

 

64 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Oh! My Favorite

Hahahahah, Malache!  You’re right that it is "so old" that women freak out over this.  Another "dumb woman" trip I’ve never understood is getting angry because your man is looking at other women in real life.  I’m only worried about what other women my man might be TOUCHING, and even then I’d have to think about what I’m doing to lead him into the arms of another woman (Cads not included).  Too many women shut off the sex valve and then are flabbergasted when they find out their husbands are having affairs.  It’s 2009 and women need to drop the shame of sex from their minds and get on with it.  Especially if the woman is a wife.

By Oh! My Favorite on 05/22/2009 6:18 pm
Malache Deux
Agreed, whole heartedly! Looking doesn’t equate to touching, not even in the slightest. And if that’s the case, I don’t want to hear another girl swoon over Brad Pitt, ever! ;)
By Malache Deux on 05/27/2009 10:40 am
r c

LW#2, I agree with Shock.  The fact that his fantasies are remaining on a screen and not becoming life size clearly shows that his main interest is YOU.

 As a side note, I would just like to say men get a bad rap for this.  The brains of women and men work very differently, including the fantasy part.  Show a woman a sexy Elf-ed Orlando Bloom and our imaginations can run on for hours.  We don’t have to answer to anyone since we’re much better at imagining.  Plus, let’s face it, a woman exercising her right to fantasy is embraced far more than a man’s. 

I’m not sure that men are quite as creative in the fantasy department.  They need the visual, which I think is why women get so intimidated and fearful of a lack of fidelity when they catch a man with his hand in the fantasy cookie jar.

 LW#2, can you honestly say you have never, ever, in the course of your entire relationship had a fantasy involving someone who is NOT your man? Celebrities included?  I don’t think I would be the only one to be surprised if you said yes.

If the concept of him seeking out other women bothers you that much, you can try one of two things - A.  Find the video he was looking at, replicate the outfit right down to the shoes, and re-enact the video, adding a few personalized flairs OR B. Try finding a video you can both enjoy and watch it together.  You just might get some great ideas, and you’ll have the security of knowing whatever fantasies the videos inspire involve you.  (Plus, you’ll be just the most coolest girlfriend EVER, LoL) 

By r c on 05/07/2009 10:38 am
John Lee

You are right on with this one.  Women get a pass when they fantasize about celebrities because fortunately for them, they leave little or no evidence.  Men, needing more visual simulation, tend to leave evidence (I mean browser history and DVDs, get your mind of the gutter!).  The question is whether or not these fantasies impact a couple’s sex life.  If a woman stops finding her man attractive because she all caught up in ridiculous romance novel ideals or celebrity worship, then she is just as guilty of "cheating" as a man who disregards his woman in favor of pornography.

Both men and women need to make sure their lover is number one on the priority list, but at the same time, both partners must also realize that a little fantasizing (within reason) is OK.

By John Lee on 05/07/2009 11:41 am
Shantell Sunderman

Two points — 1) The grass is always greener where it’s watered and taken care of.

2) Margo, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, aka the Mormons, has not condoned polygamy in over 100 years. Big Love is NOT an accurate representation of the LDS Church.

By Shantell Sunderman on 05/07/2009 10:53 am
Margo Howard
I was trying to be entertaining, and have already heard from quite a few LDSers saying that "Big Love" is as instructive about Mormonism as Vogue covers are about women’s figures.
By Margo Howard on 05/07/2009 11:12 am
Libra Lady
Margo….for some reason this reply came to my email?  Don’t quite understand since I didn’t even post on this topic (yet)!  I’m sure you meant it to be to the above poster, but why it came to my email, bewilders me?  Maybe a software problem?  Just wanted to alert Wow staff to this error.
By Libra Lady on 05/07/2009 12:09 pm
Toni H
The reason why you got her reply in your email is because if you have it set up so that you get all Postings by Margo in your mailbox, it’ll send you New Posts & New Comments.  A New Post is the letters that she does and the new Comments is just that, a new comment, like what you wrote & what I’m writing now.  Kinda confusing, but just look at the subject & it’ll tell ya if it’s a post or a comment.
By Toni H on 05/07/2009 12:19 pm
Libra Lady
Toni…thanks so much for the explanation….live and learn…duh is me!!!   :-)
By Libra Lady on 05/07/2009 12:41 pm
r t
There is a feature in the preferences of your profile that says you will get an e-mail each time Margo posts a comment. I believe you can turn this off and on. Check it out.
By r t on 05/07/2009 12:31 pm
Shannon T
If you are signed up to receive updates on Margo’s postings to your e-mail, then that is the reason why. It will not only notify you when she posts a new article, but when she posts a comment as well. Even if it is not in reply to one you made. It is an automatic thing. Not sure you can turn it off unless you turn off both, but I could be wrong.
By Shannon T on 05/07/2009 1:28 pm
Libra Lady

Shannon and RT..thank you…I understand now….just a little slow…but thank your for taking the time to clear it up….now it all makes sense….I do remember signing up for Margo’s letters now.  :-)

By Libra Lady on 05/07/2009 1:42 pm
Lydia Jones

I think that each time Margo makes a personal comment it goes to all of our inbox, in case we might be interested, and I am sure many are.  At least that has been my own experience…whether or not I have posted on the topic.
I actually quite enjoy seeing her additional posts.  But I think you are going to have to go to the added trouble of just deleting.

By Lydia Jones on 05/08/2009 11:36 am
Libra Lady
Lydia….now that I understand how this works….I wouldn’t think of deleting Margo’s replies….I love her!!!  Thanks Lydia!!  Have a great weekend.
By Libra Lady on 05/08/2009 12:18 pm
Lydia Jones

You too!
And Happy Mother’s Day if you are a Mother, Aunt, or Special Friend…

By Lydia Jones on 05/08/2009 1:04 pm