Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

A Friend Stopped By | 06/15/2009 11:00 pm

A Father's Days, by Joel Schwartzberg

Sometimes it takes a divorce to discover what it really means to be a father
By Joel Schwartzberg
Editor’s Note: Joel Schwartzberg is an award-winning essayist and author of the just-released The 40-Year-Old Version: Humoirs of a Divorced Dad.

Father’s Day – at least as Hallmark and Wikipedia define it – doesn’t mean all that much to me, even though being a dad is one of the most important jobs I have.

For one thing, consider Father’s Day’s most obvious icons: golf-themed ice cream cakes, unmatchable gift ties and greeting cards that emphasize our laziness, our inattentiveness or our proximity to senility. June’s third Sunday is not so much a celebration of dads as it is a snarky toast to the lesser parent.

I personally celebrate Father’s Day every Saturday. My kids – a son, 9, and twin 6-year-old girls – and I call it “Lazy Dadurday”; the courts call it “shared custody.” But in many ways my fatherhood was born years after my three children were. My divorce forced me to be the dad I am, a separate entity from the dad everyone from my ex-wife to Dr. Phil expected me to be.

Last Father’s Day, about a year into my separation, I felt like the parental version of the former planet Pluto, suddenly demoted and now orbiting at the farthest, coldest point. I couldn’t tell if I was fathering my children well. I couldn’t even tell if they were loving me back.

But one night in my apartment, while one of my daughters was snuggling to sleep with her “sniff shirt” (a worn blouse my ex-wife routinely packed for her), her twin sister looked up at me with her big, almost completely round eyes and asked for a “daddy sniff shirt.”

I was about to grab one off a hanger, then opted for the hamper.

She brought the t-shirt to her nose, took in a deep smell and crinkled her nose.

“Too stinky?” I asked.

“No. I like it.”

Seeing her asleep with her daddy sniff shirt pressed to her face was the beginning of my reeducation and re-empowerment as a father. It helped me realize that my children have one and only one dad, no matter what happens. That they have two homes: one with their mom and one with their dad. That they don’t just visit me; they live with me.

That day, even in its waning hours, became my first true Father’s Day.

I’ve since developed a fully grown inner dad, one who tells me when it’s OK to let my son stay up late, and when it’s not; when it’s appropriate to be interrupted on the phone by a whining daughter, and when it’s not; when a tense situation calls for stern rules, or just an all-out, no-shoes family wrestling match.

My inner dad tells me I don’t have to entertain my children with amazing spectacles every weekend. We sleep late on Saturday mornings and chomp homemade pancakes while watching kid movies on the DVR. We have scavenger hunts at Kmart, vote on car radio stations and play UNO until we’re all bleary eyed and their small fingers are tired from holding massive fans of cards.

Every so often I dump a soft hill of brown and black dress socks over their heads like leaves, and they delight in matching and folding them. My girls in particular love organizing my vitamins into their little plastic rooms in my pillbox. They approach the task with the focus of FDA scientists.

8 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

L. C.

I enjoyed your article. It’s good to see you now truly understand what it means to be a parent.

 Being a loving and responsible parent is the most important priviledge we will ever have.

Sharing time together communicating and having fun does not require the spending of mountains of cash. When we go to meet our maker I don’t think anyone wants their last words to be "I should have spent more money at Mcdonalds, Burger King, Wendys or Toys R Us!" 

By L. C. on 06/16/2009 6:32 am
B Clark
Great article!  Finding a Father’s Day card that isn’t out right insulting is hard work.  Card companies have no trouble with a broad range of cards for Mother’s Day, but they fall flat for fathers and I’ve always wondered why.  There’s no market for wives / children who want to say how much they love and appreciate the man in their lives without some snide joke about beer, body odors, golf and/or duct tape?   Come on cards writers!  You’ve got to do better than "For all that you do, this card is for you"!
By B Clark on 06/16/2009 7:43 am
Ali Bell
 I loved this article, and was moved by your statement ‘Sometimes it takes a divorce to discover what it really means to be a father. I know how true that was for us. Ever since our divorce my husband has become a better father, maybe because he has learned to appreciate them more. Or maybe because left to their own devices they have learned to bond together their way, not mine. However it came about, the love between them is true and strong & beautiful to see. 
By Ali Bell on 06/16/2009 8:41 am
Laurel Kornfeld
Pluto is NOT a "former planet."  Only four percent of the IAU voted on the controversial demotion, and most are not planetary scientists. Their decision was immediately opposed in a formal petition by hundreds of professional astronomers led by Dr. Alan Stern, Principal Investigator of NASA’s New Horizons mission to Pluto. One reason the IAU definition makes no sense is it says dwarf planets are not planets at all! That is like saying a grizzly bear is not a bear, and it is inconsistent with the use of the term “dwarf” in astronomy, where dwarf stars are still stars, and dwarf galaxies are still galaxies. Also, the IAU definition classifies objects solely by where they are while ignoring what they are. If Earth were in Pluto’s orbit, according to the IAU definition, it would not be a planet either. A definition that takes the same object and makes it a planet in one location and not a planet in another is essentially useless. Pluto is a planet because it is spherical, meaning it is large enough to be pulled into a round shape by its own gravity—a state known as hydrostatic equilibrium and characteristic of planets, not of shapeless asteroids held together by chemical bonds. These reasons are why many astronomers, lay people, and educators are either ignoring the demotion entirely or working to get it overturned.
By Laurel Kornfeld on 06/16/2009 12:12 pm
J Holmes
Joel, Your children are lucky.
By J Holmes on 06/16/2009 2:36 pm
Joel Schwartzberg

Thanks so much to all, and special kudos to the Pro-Pluto crowd for seeing through the veneer of my seemingly father-focused essay to reveal my ulterior motive: to keep the dwarf Pluto dethroned! Well done, sir. Well done.

Joel 

(For more of my planetary pointers, see: http://bit.ly/19Uw4H)

By Joel Schwartzberg on 06/16/2009 10:46 pm
Samantha Hale
Thank you for sharing Joel.  Beautiful.  Hope you will contribute again some time. 
By Samantha Hale on 06/17/2009 10:15 pm