Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the username or e-mail address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

A Friend Stopped By | 06/25/2009 1:00 am

Isn't It Time We Marry for Money? The Gold Digger Debate, by Daniela Drake

The author of a controversial new book, Smart Girls Marry Money, argues that when it comes to finding a life partner, riches are more important than love.
By Daniela Drake

In reality, we’re just two working moms who, like millions, are affected by some disturbing trends. Our inquiry started with a shared laugh. So we crafted the book as a satire, a comical query that satisfies two deep human longings — to laugh with understanding and to invoke corrective change.

After all, the latest studies say that after 40 years of feminism, women are unhappier. The reasons are many. Could it have to do with women working harder than ever? Or the fact that with disposable marriages we feel, well, disposable? Does it have to do with the fact that we have to keep working when our natural instinct might be to nest, mother or at least put our feet up? I’m not entirely sure, but I get the sneaking suspicion it might also have to do with those stilettos we’re all toddling around in these days. Whatever the case, change is needed, because something’s not right with this whole picture. And that’s no joke.

61 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

JamestheGame

Yep, we folk who have little money have little value.

By JamestheGame on 06/25/2009 1:07 am
AndreaBrandon

James,

Where did that come from? I didn’t get that implication at all.

By AndreaBrandon on 06/25/2009 2:20 am
JamestheGame
Right from the headline itself, Andrea. "Riches are more important than love"
By JamestheGame on 06/25/2009 10:56 am
AndreaBrandon
Well I’ll be hog-tied. Right in front of me and I didn’t even get it.
By AndreaBrandon on 06/25/2009 3:44 pm
Lee Harrison

James,

Nothing says you can’t find a rich woman to marry;-)

By Lee Harrison on 06/25/2009 8:36 pm
JamestheGame
Just social anxiety disorder, Lee.
By JamestheGame on 06/25/2009 10:06 pm
darcusgrey1
James, does that photograph feature you on the floor in front of an open refrigerator? Just wondering…
By darcusgrey1 on 06/29/2009 11:07 pm
JamestheGame
ding, ding, ding…you win!
By JamestheGame on 06/30/2009 12:31 am
TrizaMu1
rom your dating patterns, i wonder whether what you say hold.you said you like casual dates ansd are happy.does it mean that you pay money for it?
By TrizaMu1 on 06/30/2009 4:09 pm
JamestheGame
I never said any such thing, and I wouldn’t "pay" for any date.
By JamestheGame on 06/30/2009 6:05 pm
ChristineCline
Oh, how right you are James. Don’t you know us poor folk are also uneducated, lazy, slovenly and lousy parents. So why would anyone want to marry us?
By ChristineCline on 06/25/2009 9:39 pm
AndreaBrandon

I think the sad reality is that while women have infiltrated and succeeded in their professional lives, they’re still stuck with all the housewifey and kidly stuff in a marriage. [And on 5" stilettos!]

No wonder women are burned out. Blame it on the shoes.

By AndreaBrandon on 06/25/2009 2:23 am
LilaKuh
Too too true!
By LilaKuh on 06/25/2009 8:20 am
JamestheGame

The article is really demeaning. "Riches are more important than love", "romanticism is fleeting." I’m still madly in love with my woman who died 18 years ago. I wouldn’t call that "fleeting". There are many, many couples for whom romance has not died. Better to marry for romance than money. Reminds of the song by The Eagles, "Your Lyin’ Eyes."

By JamestheGame on 06/25/2009 11:00 am
VictoriaJ
They wrote it for the MONEY..so they could kick up their heels and drink coffee…bet ten years ago, they were spouting off about their careers and finding themselves professionally.  Now they find that life is hard work…They’re called opportunists!
By VictoriaJ on 06/27/2009 11:34 am