Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

The Love Goddess | 10/19/2009 12:15 pm

The Love Goddess: Are We Too Far Gone for Monogamy?

The impact of women’s sexual histories on lifelong fidelity …

Editor’s Note: Who is the wisest of them all? Who is more dedicated to your pleasure than anyone on earth? Who can help you when you’re going online for the first time to find love; or when your lover’s children hate you; or when you want to strangle your husband? Why, the Love Goddess, of course. She promises nothing less than celestial wisdom, heavenly sex, divine dating. Read on …

I’ve been trying to figure out why I don’t feel passionately about all the adultery going on around us, be it David Letterman’s or Bernie Madoff’s. I hate many aspects of the same old dramas — but I no longer see them as the powerful taking advantage of the not-so-powerful and the pious being hideously hypocritical. I don’t see victims in some of these liaisons the way I might once have.

Perhaps the wives of these adulterous men in the news aren’t having affairs, but trust me, many other wives are. While most married with the idea of being faithful, let me ask you this: What can the notion of lifelong monogamy possibly mean to a young woman who has had 50 lovers at the time she marries? (If you’re wincing at that figure, don’t; it’s a modest one, given that a girl is statistically likely to start having sex at the age of 15 and not marry until she’s 27. Which gives her 13 years during which she is trying out different kinds of lovers, at a rate of roughly four lovers a year, unless she has an ongoing exclusive relationship for a few of those years.) Some earth girls I’ve spoken with have counted 100 lovers before they married. (Most goddesses? Well, they’ve simply lost count.) 

You tend to do what you have always done; it’s hard – with sex as with drinking coffee – to break the habit.

The impact of premarital sex on marital fidelity in all the research I’ve seen is simple: A woman, just like a man, is more likely to have extramarital sex if she has had premarital sex. And she’s particularly likely to do so if she has had a wide variety of lovers rather than following a pattern of serial monogamy. You tend to do what you have always done; it’s hard — with sex as with drinking coffee — to break the habit.   

Women over, say, 45, simply can’t understand what words like "permanence" and "sexual fidelity" mean to a young woman of 24. Why? Because that young woman can only define those words in her imagination. They’re an ideal. She may never even have witnessed them among the adults she knows, let alone lived them. And this same young woman can’t imagine precisely how restrictive marriage is going to be, because unlike women before her, she has never lived in such a restricted way.

I’m happily married. I’m not saying marriage is a bad idea. And I’m not suggesting that marriage cease to be a binding, sexually exclusive contract. I’m not saying we won’t go on being shocked at the infidelity around us. But I am saying this: Fidelity in marriage today is hugely difficult for our sexually sophisticated young women and men. And we make a mistake perpetuating the myth that marriage is the last stop in a long, young life of unheard-of-before sexual activity. We could begin to help couples who opt to become faithful dig deeply into their sexual habits. We could begin to help them deal with the difficulty implicit in breaking their habits. We could help them negotiate for themselves the thorny issues of the words we hold so dear — "permanence" and "fidelity." 

And we can stop thinking of all women who sleep with powerful men as unwitting victims. They may have entered the relationship as casually as the men did.

Want more from the Love Goddess? Read past articles from the Love Goddess by clicking hereLike all savvy goddesses, the Love Goddess has her own site, which you can visit by clicking here.    

More from wowOwow:

Infidelity: Do the Math, by Dalma Heyn 

The wOw Conversation: Is ‘The Good Wife’ the ‘Smart Wife’? 

I Was the Other Woman, by Jane Ganahl

25 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Lepidopter Phoenyx

Monogamy is a wonderful idea and something to strive for, but the truth is, people slip up all the time.

 

A "slip-up" is something that happens accidentally, like putting your shoes on the wrong feet, or running out of gas because you weren’t paying attention to your fuel gauge. Infidelity doesn’t "just happen." You can’t get nekkid and knock boots with someone without knowing you’re doing it.

 

For those who want "wiggle room" in their marriages, that’s fine - as long as BOTH spouses are on board with the idea. It can’t be a unilateral decision.

By Lepidopter Phoenyx on 10/21/2009 7:09 am
Leigh Hart

Why is there no discussion of respect here? Most women who sleep around have minimal if any self-respect. Either they don’t think or care that guys have no problem using them or they don’t feel confident that they can climb the corporate ladder without screwing their way up it.

As for the men, why are they going to respect women who have no self-respect?

If you decide to marry and build a partnership and commit to monogamy, then respect your spouse enough to honor your commitment.

The younger generation is more cavalier about sex, true…but not across the board. I have a 20 year old daughter in college. She has stories galore of the sluts whom the guys have no respect for…recently how one came home just the other night with cum dripping from her hair talking about how she slept with two different guys hours from each other. The majority of the girls at the house were too appalled to say a word.

Interestingly, my daughter has guys calling her all the time to hang out. She’s the one they want to talk with and do things with. They think she’s smart, cool, beautiful and drama free. And they point blank tell her "We LOVE that you aren’t a slut."

By Leigh Hart on 10/21/2009 12:23 am
Laurie Morgan

This commentary is just as misguided as filanderers are.  The problem is not that we’re just too prudish to recognize that fidelity is an outdated concept, it’s that people who don’t want to be monogamous are making promises and betraying people who do.  Monogamy might be an outdated practice, but it is plainly wrong to make promises, break promises and lie.  Whether it is about sex, money, work, or anything else, promising something to an intimate partner and then betraying that promise is hurtful and wrong.

I do think that our society has contributed to this deceptive behavior by glorifying monogamy and shaming promiscuity in conflict with natural urges.  Many cheaters get a special thrill out of hurting the people they made promises to because of this taboo, and feel obligated to be deceptive rather than open about their promiscuity.  People should be encouraged to be as promiscuous as they want but to be so openly and honestly, not using marriage as a way to trap innocent people into a situation they would not consent to. 

No matter how common infidelity is though, it is nothing less than devastating to those who have been betrayed.  Perhaps the marital affairs appearing in the media are not disclosing the existence of open marriages, and there would be nothing wrong with two people agreeing not to be exclusive, but make no mistake, there are many people out there who are making committments to be monogamous to people who want and take that committment seriously, and betrayal to them is absolutely, positively devastating (and wrong!) 

By Laurie Morgan on 10/21/2009 12:49 am
CYNTHIA NEIL

We should start out with the question of who created the concept of "monogamy".   Men did, for the purpose of knowing that they fathered the children they were feeding.   They did not wish to feed children of other men.

When a woman is past the stage of child bearing is there a real purpose to monogamous behavior?   There is certainly, if that is the type of relationship she wishes to have AND her partner is of a like mind.

For 22 years of marriage I was monogamous for all of the reasons stated in the comments above.  i had given my word, I respected myself, and ethical behavior is a central pillar of my character.   That is not to say that I was not occasionally tempted, but my word has ALWAYS been my bond.   It nearly destroyed me.

My husband, on the other hand, because of his own emotional cowardice and dissatisfaction with our marriage, ended up seeking other women and ultimately (while on a job 2000 miles from our home) moving in with a woman.   this after telling me that we had to get married because (I wished to live together) anything else implied a lack of commitment.

I was widowed in 2007 and will never again allow anyone to tell me what I must do and who I must be.    I was born to be a free spirit, and that means a freedom to choose who I wish to go to bed with.  Monogamy may be for some people and I applaud their choice.   It is not for ALL people.  And I should not be labeled promiscuous or slutty because my choices differ from yours.   For women to be willing to judge each other so harshly based on values created by men is a pity, because I assure you men do not engage in that kind of labeling.

Listen to them talk to each other about sex, men who have multiple sex partners are celebrated or at worst poked fun at, but they are never called something as ugly sounding as the word slut.   Why do we do that to each other?

By CYNTHIA NEIL on 10/21/2009 8:38 am
Lepidopter Phoenyx
I was born to be a free spirit, and that means a freedom to choose who I wish to go to bed with.  Monogamy may be for some people and I applaud their choice.   It is not for ALL people.  And I should not be labeled promiscuous or slutty because my choices differ from yours.   For women to be willing to judge each other so harshly based on values created by men is a pity, because I assure you men do not engage in that kind of labeling.

Listen to them talk to each other about sex, men who have multiple sex partners are celebrated or at worst poked fun at, but they are never called something as ugly sounding as the word slut.   Why do we do that to each other?

 

Good for you for figuring out what it is you want and need, and taking charge of fulfilling your own needs and desires. You’re absolutely right - if monogamy is not what you want or need, then you should not make that promise, nor should you be looked down on for refusing to make a promise that you don’t want to keep.

Your body and your sexuality are yours to enjoy as you wish, either alone or with a partner or partners whose needs and desires reflect and complement your own.

By Lepidopter Phoenyx on 10/21/2009 9:24 am
Leigh Hart

Cynthia, Perhaps you are listening to other free spirits, or TV characters…because in real life men do disparage other men who are sluts. There are plenty of men who have no respect for men who don’t respect women. The biggest "player" on campus is usually viewed with disgust. The guy at the office who screws every new admin support female is considered a douche. He is often considered supremely insecure by his peers. The reality is a bit different than you describe.

By Leigh Hart on 10/23/2009 12:09 am
Gerri Lynn

This post bothers me because of its polarization between monogamy and infidelity without acknowledging the polyamory choice. Not everyone is suited to be monogamous, no matter how hard they try. I know I was monogamous in my first marriage, and it was HARD because it went against my nature. For me, sex is sex, and love is love, and woe to the person who confuses the two. I respect people who can be monogamous, but I can’t do it. My second husband and I talked about the issue before we got married, and we agreed to leave monogamy out of our vows and expectations, that no matter what else happened, our partnership came first. So far, it has worked.

Evidently, there have been studies—I haven’t seen them, but I’ve seen them quoted—that indicate cheaters would cheat, no matter if they have a monogamous or polyamorous relationship. It’s not about permission or passion; it’s the thrill of doing something and skirting on the edge of getting caught, or getting caught. It’s about the cheating, not the sex, in other words.

To claim monogamy is the pinnacle of marital behavior and is the only ideal causes more damage than good. Some people are monogamous. Some people are cheaters. Some people are polyamorous. Some people can easily practice polyfidelity. We need to acknowledge the inherent differences, help people figure out what they are, and to deal with what is, not attempt to jam everyone into a box whether they fit or not. No one true way.

By Gerri Lynn on 10/21/2009 12:41 pm
Lepidopter Phoenyx

Good point. As long as everyone involved in the relationship is on the same page, whatever works for you is what you should do.

If you can’t or don’t want to be monogamous, and your partners are all okay with that, go for it.

The problem comes when people who have promised monogamy break that promise without giving the other person a heads-up.

By Lepidopter Phoenyx on 10/22/2009 8:46 am