Mother Kills Son, Self | 04/07/2009 11:05 am
Marie Moore Shooting Shocks Nation

A mother with a history of mental instability fatally shot her son before committing suicide at a Florida shooting range this weekend.
Marie Moore, 44, was at Shoot Straight, in Casselberry, FL, 20 minutes north of Orlando, on Sunday, with her son Mitchell, 20. According to witnesses and a surveillance video, the two appeared to be getting along until Moore went behind her son with a rented revolver and fired a single bullet at the back of Mitchell’s head. She then put the gun in her mouth and pulled the trigger.
Her son died on the scene, and Moore died hours later in a hospital. On Monday, police were still trying to figure out what drove the woman to kill her son. While so many questions are left unanswered, our hearts and prayers go out to the family and their friends, touched by this tragedy.
Click here for more from the local NBC news affiliate, News 14.
Update 4/9: Marie Moore left three suicide notes and audio tapes.
Editor’s Note: Due to readers’ concerns, the original image was taken down and changed to the above.























123 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
I don’t want to speak for DeBurca because I can’t actually tell her views about gun control from her post. But that’s just it, she didn’t say anything about gun control one way or the other. She just asked a simple question - what the heck is going on with people?? I think that’s a pretty fair question regardless of where you stand on the issue.
It has been going on from the beginning of time. However, you will be seeing and hearing of more in the coming days. The over exposure in our daily newscasts will be used to push through gun laws that effectively ban the legal and stable citizen from aquiring one.
The mentally ill will kill with a knife, (OJ) a bathtub, (Yates) poison, whatever they choose. Gangs kill each other within their own race and culture for status and quick money. They do not buy weapons and register them, they are ILLEGAL. We have the laws in place, they need to be inforced. But they won’t be, because this works for this administration.
They want for this to look out of control, they depend on that so the public fear will create a "crisis" that will allow more gun restrictions to the citizens of this country. Remember, first they have to disarm the public.
That means the legal, responsible public. The unlawful have them anyway and they can be dealt with by force at a later date, as they are illegal in status. The unarmed public will then demand action to be protected from these illegal weapons.The law abiding citizens can not handled by force, yet. They must be disarmed first, for this to go down smoothly.
We are being manipulated again. The illegals could have been stipped of their weapons and put away for life, if that was what our politicians wanted. But that would create a storm of protest and shouts of "racism" because most of the gangs and drug organizations are run through racial affliations.
Much easier to disarm the law abiding and then shoot the illeagals as they are confronted. Think about it. Really think about this.
First, what do you mean when you say "This works for this administration" in regards to illegal gun ownership?
Second, everyone who owns a car has to pass certain tests and restrictions, and they have to have it and the serial number registered. I don’t see the big deal about this also applying to a gun. A sane, logical member of society wouldn’t have any problem with that.
Also, I remember being terrified by the last administration, not this one. Obama has spoken positively and hasn’t used fear to get people to rally behind him.
After September 11, 2001, Americans were bombarded with vague terrorist warnings, with color-coded “alerts,” with talk of mushroom clouds and nefarious plots to blow up bridges and tall buildings. Don’t you remember the constant fear-soaked press releases from the White House, of impending threats that generated fear—fear of terrorism, fear of more 9/11–style attacks, fear of nuclear annihilation, fear of our ports being attacked, fear of our water systems being poisoned—and, of course, fear of excessive civil liberties or cumbersome laws jeopardizing our “homeland security.” How do you think they got that US PATRIOT act passed to strip us of our rights and allowed the government to detain, wiretap and spy on American citizens without a warrant?
Just a quick quote to cement my statement; here is Dick Cheney in early January 2006, proudly defending the administration’s illegal eavesdropping program by invoking the specter of terrorism fears:
Cheney never once addresses the fact that the administration had full leeway to eavesdrop on terrorists without breaking the law. He ignores that fact because he is not making a rational argument. He is attempting to play on the fears of Americans to justify their violations of law.
You can turn my comments around to suit yourself, but I post for the ones that can think for themselves. I have stated that there are gun controls in place. Further limiting of responsible ownership only serves to push the government into a stronger position to decide just who can have a gun.
The illegal elements will not be affected ONE iota by more stringent gun laws. You obviously have no idea of what is now required to own a gun do you? No you don’t, you have no idea. Do you think that they require registration? Yes.
You attempt to compare it to a driving liscense….ok….do you want to take a mental health test to drive? Do you? Do you think that the government should be able to tell you how to park your car and where your keys are allowed to be kept? Do you? ARE YOU AWARE THAT CARS KILL MORE CITIZENS THAN GUNS DO????
No, you aren’t.
How can you sit there and begin to bring up the Patriot act? REALLY??? How about you enlighten us all on how many of your friends and neighbors have been adversely affected by that one? Do tell… you can’t because it has not happened.
And FYI, our county is in danger. You had better come to grips with that one. Our power grid has been infiltrated, did you not hear about that? Hmmm? Serious business here. Our food supply, our water, all that you mentioned is at risk.
Foolish is the person that doubts that. George Bush did one thing right, he kept us safe. You do not have that protection now. Your civil liberties are a moot point if you are dead.
The only thing this administration want to protect is any dissenting voice against their agenda. Their war is with us, against each other so that they can take this country from within. And so far, its working because half of Americans refuse to believe their own eyes.
Kelly,
Well, if there are gun laws in place, then obviously, they aren’t working to prevent these kinds of tragedies, so what’s the next step to insure ending these kinds of incidents? Most of the gun deaths I know of personally were with and by legal owners of their guns. J. also in Texas