Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Mary Wells | 08/23/2009 11:00 pm

Mary Wells on Women in Combat


Mary Wells
Women are now boxing in Olympics matches, entering high-risk mountain bike competitions, blowing themselves up because of religious convictions. They are running large companies. One almost became president of the United States and is the secretary of state, dealing in high-risk areas much of the time. Angela Merkel is the German chancellor in a difficult economic time. I am against war and combat in general, although I understand the simplicity of that thinking, but as they exist, if a woman chooses a combat position in the armed forces, why not find the best possible place for her abilities?


2 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

Beth Cornell
Seems I am agreeing with all the columnists on this issue. :) Why not have women in the military? We can make decisions too.
By Beth Cornell on 08/24/2009 10:29 am
dESK dIVA
no!!!!  It’s pacifist economics——if you keep the infantry short of combat troops, you restrict the time they can prolong the war.  Supply of endless cannon fodder is stupid.  They already have my son, but not my daughter too.  How will you all feel when your daughters are being drafted and sent to the front lines to protect the more valuable menfolk?
By dESK dIVA on 08/24/2009 3:56 pm