Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the username or e-mail address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.

Question of the Day | 10/15/2009 5:00 am

Is multitasking something to move toward or away from?

Joan Ganz Cooney, Candice Bergen and Liz Smith answer our question — while doing nothing else, we presume.
© Shutterstock
Candice Bergen

Candice Bergen | 10/15/2009 1:00 am

Candice Bergen on What Destroyed Our Attention Spans

Multitasking seems to have wormed its way into our brain matter and I’m not sure that’s a good thing, but it’s tough to turn back now. What’s most distressing is multitasking when driving. Oy. That gets me nuts. Texting. Talking. Drinking. Watching TV. All the while at the wheel. Insane.

 

And I think it has destroyed our attention spans. Well, on top of MTV rapid cutting. We don’t stand a chance of sustaining a thought or conversation over a minute and a half.

Liz Smith

Liz Smith | 10/15/2009 1:00 am

Liz Smith: When Multitasking Turns Deadly

Probably it is something to move away from because that way inevitably lies madness, mistakes and misunderstandings. But as life becomes more pressured, most of us will keep doing it to some extent. We can’t help it.

However, we better stop talking on the phone and/or texting or e-mailing or using gadgets while driving our cars. That is a recipe for sudden death.

Joan Ganz Cooney

Joan Ganz Cooney | 10/15/2009 1:00 am

One Reason Joan Ganz Cooney Doesn't Encourage Concentrating on Two Things at Once

When I was a child I used to listen to the radio while I did homework. My stepchildren used to watch television, talk to classmates on the phone and do their homework. I have no idea whether it’s good or bad. I wouldn’t encourage it because I know excellence demands concentration, but it will go on no matter what I think.
Read more about: Balance, Lifestyle, Management

32 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment

LeanetteT
My vote is for moderation in all things.
By LeanetteT on 10/15/2009 4:50 am
Cjay

Drew Gilpin Faust was interviewed on Charlie Rose last night, and one of her serious concerns about people today is lack of attention span. This is obvious, as Faust went on, in talking to people, and youth who cannot carry on a thought process or conversation without permitting distractions.

Multitasking is new to society, and thrown at consumers before the majority have learned how to not only use it, but know what to buy so that the technology best serves their needs; hence, people are blitzed with communication ‘tools,’ and yet cannot stop, relax, read a book, and certainly never relax and listen to an opera without wires coming from their heads. It is very sad.

http://www.charlierose.com/guest/view/6754

By Cjay on 10/15/2009 4:53 am
BabySnooks

All of us multitask at our desks. The internet, often with multi-windows open at the same time as we go back and forth, the phone, the fax and a variety of distractions as a result of just those three.  I inevitably hit "send" without doing a spell check. You would think someone would have come up with a program to make spell check automatic.

As for the gadets I don’t use them. I don’t like pagers and I don’t like cell phones and I don’t do texting and wouldn’t be caught dead on Twitter.  And I wouldn’t want to be caught dead in a car with someone who multitasks while driving. Which a growing number of people do.  

And I go absolutely nuts over people and their gadgets in theaters. Nothing ruins a good play like the sudden blast of music announcing someone has a call on their cell phone.  If it were me on stage when it happened, everything would come to a screeching halt. And then I would peer out to the audience and ask "are you finished with your phone call yet?"  We may be technologically advanced but our social skills have slowly eroded as a result. 

By BabySnooks on 10/15/2009 5:33 am
LilaKuh

Snooks, love your posts. 

"I wouldn’t want to be caught dead in a car with someone who multitasks while driving. Which a growing number of people do."  Great double-entendre… more people multitasking, and more caught dead in the car.  Literally dead.

As for the theater scenario, you will like this.  Hugh Jackman and Daniel Craig stopped their play to gripe at a cell phone user in the audience.  Video at the link:

http://www.popeater.com/2009/09/28/jackman-craig—cell-phone/
By LilaKuh on 10/15/2009 10:06 am
BClark
Multi-tasking is an illusion.  You might be trying to do multiple things at one time, but you are doing all of them poorly.  You really bounce from one task to another quickly, doing each one at a time - just like any CPU (Controller Processing Unit).  You need to prioritize what is important to do well, and then do it thoroughly and put it down when it is completed.  Can you just imagine a surgeon multi-tasking operations?  Picture three tables!   While patient #1 is being anesthetized, he can operate on patient #2, and while patient #2 is stabilizing, he can suture up patient # 3.  Ooooh!  Assembly line operating rooms!  There’s an idea!  Sorry.  My sarcasm gets away with me sometimes.
By BClark on 10/15/2009 8:31 am
joan larsen

A surgeon, like it or not, very often does multi-task now during operations.  Only this week, when a daughter broke her elbow that was indecision on operating or not.  A second opinion was needed.  The surgeon actually sent a copy of multiple X-rays to another surgeon who was operating at the time (!) to his screen in the operation room, and he momentariily stopped his operation to study her X-ray and make that decision. 

I said "WHAT?" and then asked a son who spends most of his time in another operating room in a major city in orthopedics.  And yes, this happens with decisions on another patient being made in the middle of the process he is doing.  While I realize that fractures might not be life-and-death operations, neither is decision making on another at the same time.  It is amazing what "we" don’t know that does happen — and I guess I would consider it multi-tasking. 

We, as a people, have become jugglers.  . and, as in juggling, only a few are able to perfect keeping many balls in the air for a considerable amount of time.  And when we drop the ball, depending on the circumstances, there may be considerable consequences.  We now have the new description:  "the fast-paced world".  We would be wise then to schedule our own time alone for ourselves no matter what every day, I believe, or the consequences in the home or once we are out our door have the warning signs already of DISASTER, many-layered.  We have been given advances, more often than not encased in plastic, but our modern new world.  Our love affair with these plastic advances have changed our lives - not always for the better - in a fashion that gives me pause.  How about you?  Joan

By joan larsen on 10/15/2009 8:56 am
EileenAlannah
WOW. That is crazy! Consulting another doctor who is in the middle of surgery?! I guess, what we don’t know *can* hurt us! Beautiful post, Joan, I agree completely. Those balls we juggle are after all "in the air" so dropping one is always going to be a real possibility with real consequences. 
By EileenAlannah on 10/15/2009 9:41 am
MaryESayler
Back in the day when I was a single parent with a young daughter and teaching full time I came to the conclusion that I needed to find time in the day for myself.  The reason for this decision was that I had people at me all day long—adults and children.  What I did was to set my alarm for 5:30am every day as I needed to be out of the house by 7:15 every morning so that I could get my daughter to school and then get to my own school by 8:00am.  I got my daughter up at around 6:30am so I had an hour to do things for myself.  When we got home I asked for 30 minutes to unwind as I never lived far from where I worked and that time gave me quiet to readjust to home. 
By MaryESayler on 10/15/2009 5:30 pm
joan larsen
Mary.  . I agree.  If possible, I believe it is important to find a private space (even if it is your bedroom with a desk) where you can close your door, signifying it is "my time, and not only re-group but enjoy).  There has to be balance somehow - and once those around you accept that time for you and you only, it is like a weight lifted off.  We deserve it — everyone, man or woman, deserves it.  GREAT that you started early so that that time became part of the day!
By joan larsen on 10/15/2009 5:49 pm
TinaLittlepage

I feel that all the multitasking is taking away from our personal relationships.  People rarely sit and just visit with one another anymore without being interrupted by a cell phone conversation…which they answer.  What does this say about the importance of the person you are with?  I mean, come on, we got along just fine years ago without having to interrupt lunch with a friend with a phone conversation.  It wasn’t a necessity then, and honestly it isn’t now either, we’ve just convinced ourselves to become reliant on it. While this doesn’t apply to everyone, I know it applies to many because I see it so often.  It isn’t the cell phone that is the villain, it is the way we have convinced ourselves we are dependent on them. As for the dangers of multitasking while driving, the cell phone isn’t the only culprit to blame but the most predominant now-a-days.  There is also the CD players, hot drinks, and the usual no-brain ideas that some decide to do while driving.

I would support new federeal regulations to require hands free cell phone usage while driving.  England has had this law for years, and some states here do as well, I don’t see why we as Americans have to wait for statistics of injuries and fatalities to build up before we decide to do something about it.

By TinaLittlepage on 10/15/2009 9:08 am
ChrisGlass
At home or the office multitasking is acceptable and often necessary. Who among us had not had the washer, dryer and dishwasher going at once while mopping or vacuuming? Not on the road or when spending time with family or friends. I resent going to visit someone who makes or takes call after call on a cell as though my time were of no importance. Not in a vehicle when your eyes and mind should be on the traffic.
By ChrisGlass on 10/15/2009 9:28 am
LilaKuh

Chris, multitasking by running several machines at one time isn’t the problem - that’s a "fire and forget" kind of multitasking, i.e., press Start and walk away until later. 

You have hit it on the head that the real problem is the kind of multitasking that forces your brain into that time-division multiplexing mode that steals attention from all of the tasks one is attempting at one time… including your friend right in front of you, or the operation of a vehicle on the road.  I won’t take calls when I am with a friend, unless it’s a mutual friend and we can put the call on speaker. 

By LilaKuh on 10/15/2009 9:55 am
LindaMyers

We are a society in many ways no longer is using the learning process, rather accessing needed information as needed. Side stepping the learning process which was based on learning and creating a knowledge base. Attention spans given to providing answers rather than researching, via the net and other tools relying on research already present. Add that to remote controls on tv, etc. which allow the mind to flip switches rapidly in what we choose to watch or do, rather than conscious thought.

I took my five year old grandson a couple weeks ago to what the school called Flip night. A night of explaining to parents the importance of reading comprehension, rather than just knowing the words. Stopping to ask questions and understand before just reading a book. A total 360 from the days my kids were that age and multiple forms of retaining words, reading and picking up comprehension in the process. Although good lessons and reminders for any age to focus on the knowledge rather than just accessing content.

By LindaMyers on 10/15/2009 9:39 am
LilaKuh

Linda, it’s frightening.  You are so right about the attention spans and the general inability to do original research.  I fear for the future of a country whose citizens have only such a superficial knowledge base. 

Another thing to think on - there is SO MUCH knowledge tied up in older books, magazines, newspaper, and microfilm which has not made its way to the Internet.  All of that is effectively cut off from those who won’t physically go looking for it, as we used to do in the Pre-Internet Era (I think that was somewhere between the Triassic and Quaternary geological periods, or at least seems that way).

By LilaKuh on 10/15/2009 9:49 am
LindaMyers
I probably spent the first three years out of twelve at my job researching isses in regard to code, program affilitions etc, and kept notebooks of the research. At one time what might have taken me five hours to find the answer I now had the documentation and it became a five minute fix. Since the issues were recurring that I worked with, through the research a days work at one time which might have taken 8 - 10 hours was usually 2 hours of work at day at best. At one point I left one of my notebooks in the home office in Chicago after a visit, and had to beg to have it back. They did not want to return my research. lol But they did. To myself, knowledge (research) is experience with all else just data, which kind of makes me a research freak for personal knowledge.
By LindaMyers on 10/15/2009 10:15 am