Question of the Day | 10/15/2009 4:00 am
Is multitasking something to move toward or away from?

32 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
Drew Gilpin Faust was interviewed on Charlie Rose last night, and one of her serious concerns about people today is lack of attention span. This is obvious, as Faust went on, in talking to people, and youth who cannot carry on a thought process or conversation without permitting distractions.
Multitasking is new to society, and thrown at consumers before the majority have learned how to not only use it, but know what to buy so that the technology best serves their needs; hence, people are blitzed with communication ‘tools,’ and yet cannot stop, relax, read a book, and certainly never relax and listen to an opera without wires coming from their heads. It is very sad.
All of us multitask at our desks. The internet, often with multi-windows open at the same time as we go back and forth, the phone, the fax and a variety of distractions as a result of just those three. I inevitably hit "send" without doing a spell check. You would think someone would have come up with a program to make spell check automatic.
As for the gadets I don’t use them. I don’t like pagers and I don’t like cell phones and I don’t do texting and wouldn’t be caught dead on Twitter. And I wouldn’t want to be caught dead in a car with someone who multitasks while driving. Which a growing number of people do.
And I go absolutely nuts over people and their gadgets in theaters. Nothing ruins a good play like the sudden blast of music announcing someone has a call on their cell phone. If it were me on stage when it happened, everything would come to a screeching halt. And then I would peer out to the audience and ask "are you finished with your phone call yet?" We may be technologically advanced but our social skills have slowly eroded as a result.
Snooks, love your posts.
"I wouldn’t want to be caught dead in a car with someone who multitasks while driving. Which a growing number of people do." Great double-entendre… more people multitasking, and more caught dead in the car. Literally dead.
As for the theater scenario, you will like this. Hugh Jackman and Daniel Craig stopped their play to gripe at a cell phone user in the audience. Video at the link:
http://www.popeater.com/2009/09/28/jackman-craig—cell-phone/A surgeon, like it or not, very often does multi-task now during operations. Only this week, when a daughter broke her elbow that was indecision on operating or not. A second opinion was needed. The surgeon actually sent a copy of multiple X-rays to another surgeon who was operating at the time (!) to his screen in the operation room, and he momentariily stopped his operation to study her X-ray and make that decision.
I said "WHAT?" and then asked a son who spends most of his time in another operating room in a major city in orthopedics. And yes, this happens with decisions on another patient being made in the middle of the process he is doing. While I realize that fractures might not be life-and-death operations, neither is decision making on another at the same time. It is amazing what "we" don’t know that does happen — and I guess I would consider it multi-tasking.
We, as a people, have become jugglers. . and, as in juggling, only a few are able to perfect keeping many balls in the air for a considerable amount of time. And when we drop the ball, depending on the circumstances, there may be considerable consequences. We now have the new description: "the fast-paced world". We would be wise then to schedule our own time alone for ourselves no matter what every day, I believe, or the consequences in the home or once we are out our door have the warning signs already of DISASTER, many-layered. We have been given advances, more often than not encased in plastic, but our modern new world. Our love affair with these plastic advances have changed our lives - not always for the better - in a fashion that gives me pause. How about you? Joan
I feel that all the multitasking is taking away from our personal relationships. People rarely sit and just visit with one another anymore without being interrupted by a cell phone conversation…which they answer. What does this say about the importance of the person you are with? I mean, come on, we got along just fine years ago without having to interrupt lunch with a friend with a phone conversation. It wasn’t a necessity then, and honestly it isn’t now either, we’ve just convinced ourselves to become reliant on it. While this doesn’t apply to everyone, I know it applies to many because I see it so often. It isn’t the cell phone that is the villain, it is the way we have convinced ourselves we are dependent on them. As for the dangers of multitasking while driving, the cell phone isn’t the only culprit to blame but the most predominant now-a-days. There is also the CD players, hot drinks, and the usual no-brain ideas that some decide to do while driving.
I would support new federeal regulations to require hands free cell phone usage while driving. England has had this law for years, and some states here do as well, I don’t see why we as Americans have to wait for statistics of injuries and fatalities to build up before we decide to do something about it.
Chris, multitasking by running several machines at one time isn’t the problem - that’s a "fire and forget" kind of multitasking, i.e., press Start and walk away until later.
You have hit it on the head that the real problem is the kind of multitasking that forces your brain into that time-division multiplexing mode that steals attention from all of the tasks one is attempting at one time… including your friend right in front of you, or the operation of a vehicle on the road. I won’t take calls when I am with a friend, unless it’s a mutual friend and we can put the call on speaker.
We are a society in many ways no longer is using the learning process, rather accessing needed information as needed. Side stepping the learning process which was based on learning and creating a knowledge base. Attention spans given to providing answers rather than researching, via the net and other tools relying on research already present. Add that to remote controls on tv, etc. which allow the mind to flip switches rapidly in what we choose to watch or do, rather than conscious thought.
I took my five year old grandson a couple weeks ago to what the school called Flip night. A night of explaining to parents the importance of reading comprehension, rather than just knowing the words. Stopping to ask questions and understand before just reading a book. A total 360 from the days my kids were that age and multiple forms of retaining words, reading and picking up comprehension in the process. Although good lessons and reminders for any age to focus on the knowledge rather than just accessing content.
Linda, it’s frightening. You are so right about the attention spans and the general inability to do original research. I fear for the future of a country whose citizens have only such a superficial knowledge base.
Another thing to think on - there is SO MUCH knowledge tied up in older books, magazines, newspaper, and microfilm which has not made its way to the Internet. All of that is effectively cut off from those who won’t physically go looking for it, as we used to do in the Pre-Internet Era (I think that was somewhere between the Triassic and Quaternary geological periods, or at least seems that way).

14 Comments





























