Obama Shirtless on Washingtonian | 04/21/2009 8:00 am
President Barack Obama Shirtless on Washingtonian Cover (Image)

The May issue of Washingtonian recycled the infamous paparazzi photograph of a shirtless President Barack Obama to illustrate one reason why people "love living here: Our new neighbor is hot."
The picture was snapped as Obama vacationed in Hawaii with this family in December, days before the first family officially moved to Pennsylvania Avenue.
Garrett Graff, editor-at-large at Washingtonian, a monthly entertainment and lifestyle magazine read by more than 400,000 people, told ABC News the idea for the cover came during a staff discussion about the Obamas arrival and the "celebrity aspect that has brought energy to the city and the attention of the paparazzi."
"The Obamas are the center of attention here and the whole world is looking to Washington now in a way we haven’t seen in years," Graff said.
In February 2007, a different beach photograph of the then-Senator of Illinois stirred a media frenzy. In response to the publicity, Barack Obama voiced his dismay that the public wasn’t curious about his policies but rather his pectorals.
"The problem is that that’s not what you guys have been reporting on," he said. "You’ve been reporting on how I look in a swimsuit."
Tell us: What do you think of the May issue of Washingtonian? Is it innocent? Fun? Disrespectful? Degrading?























68 Reader Comments (so far…) Sign In or Register to comment
- Main Entry: ce·leb·ri·ty
- Pronunciation: \sə-ˈle-brə-tē\
- Function: noun
- Inflected Form(s): plural ce·leb·ri·ties
- Date: 14th century
1 : the state of being celebrated : fame 2 : a famous or celebrated person I, for one, like having a "celebrity" for President. What’s wrong with America being liked again because our President is being celebrated or famouse for looks, policies, leadership, smile, kindness, intelligence?C Hardy,
Sweetheart, he was a celebrity then too. And, don’t we always blame the last company head for bad management? Isn’t that why we have new leadership because we think the old leadership sucked? In my opinion, having been in office for less than six-months he has shown tremendous capacity to do the job. I am certain we hired the right guy. I happen to prefer his management style. The are difficult times and I don’t want a confrontational, knee-jerk Commander in Chief. I want a sober thinking, methodical, courageous leader. Most of those complaining have never run for office and will never "step up the the plate". I say let’s all accept the challenge and roll up our sleeves to pitch in…even if you have been paying your dues, there is more to be paid now.