Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.
Oh! My Favorite

Oh! My Favorite

My Comments (179 so far…)

Liz Smith: Rihanna – Dump Your Abuser, Now!

I’ve seen that, too, Terrie.  That’s what I was talking about when I commented on Marva Marva.  If a man is a brute he’s going to abuse me regardless of my behavior.  If a man is hit by a women he’s going to hit her back nowadays.  Now, Marva doesn’t like the victim seat, but I’d rather have victim bruises than retaliatory bruises if I’ve gotta call the cops.

Liz Smith: Rihanna – Dump Your Abuser, Now!

Marva Marva, I am in sync with your opinion.  I’m also a feminist (actually I’m a female chauvanist) but I fear for the antiquated thinking of women (and society) that men should never hit.  There is a vast difference between "should" and "does".  I believe that when physically provoked ANYone will hit and that modern women rely on the old adage too heavily.  Considering the imbalance between a man’s brawn and a woman’s I’d rather be an non-provocative recipient of a man’s unbridled violence, if I must, because, as I said above, nowadays when physically provoked ANYone will hit!  I think you make a valid and balancing comment.

Spring has arrived! In this time of rebirth and renewal, what do you want to remake or rework in your life?

I want to remake my self-esteem to more closely reflect my childhood when I thought the world was wide open for fun and fabulous me.  And rework the way I go about conducting my daily life and interactions.

Dear Margo: No One Would Call This 'Romantic'

Hi Malache.  It seems that we almost agree.  I don’t understand where we are misunderstanding each other.  I am advocating that each person weigh the qualities of a potential mate as regards the institution of marriage.  I’m saying that each person should know what they want from a union before entering that union and not allow the glow of love to blind each to the flaws which could bring strife to a marriage.

What is the best present you have ever received?

When I came home from the hospital with my newborn daughter one of my closest friends presented me with a camera.  It was so wonderful to have the means to capture "the times of your life" (to quote Paul Anka’s Kodak commercial).

Dear Margo: No One Would Call This 'Romantic'

Hello Malache. I agree with you that preconceived ideals for a mate "sets up an expectation and a precident".  That is my entire point.  All of those factors become emotional fodder for discord over the years of living with a person who cannot or will not meet our expectations.  And EVERYone has expectations about marriage:  looks, companionship, income, housing, social life, children, retirement.  Usually it’s the thinking that "love" will cement the union and hold it through whatever may come that confuses a couple into feeling there’s nothing to talk about regarding expectations and plans.  Then you wake up one morning shocked that she’s a shopaholic spending the household cash right out from under the bills and you and the kids.  Or he’s a cheat putting you at risk for STD’s.  Or you want 3 children and she wants 1.  Or he lacks the ambition to climb the corporate ladder.  Or she isn’t moving more than 3 blocks from her mother and not going with him when his job sends him to another state.  Or she doesn’t care about letting her looks go and she doesn’t turn him on anymore so the sex and affection disappears.  In my writing I never mentioned "changing" another person to MEET your personal expectations.  All I’m saying is that EACH person considering marriage should know what he wants, what is negotiable and what is a deal breaker.  Then each should take the time to observe the other to see if the type of person this is today in our "romance" is likely to grow with the RELATIONSHIP over the years so that you will still love that person throughout the obligations of life together.That’s what I meant when I said she should flip the script and "fix a list in your mind of how your man could improve his ways and means in order for your life to be pleasant and acceptable with him."

Dear Margo: No One Would Call This 'Romantic'

Curious Cat needs to change her perspective and maybe even copy her man’s.  Marriage is NOT about romance.  It is an agreement between a man, woman and the state that is modernly prompted by romance.  Think down the road a piece and you might see a too long walk with a mate who is emotionally distant, financially irresponsible or, who knows what you won’t be able to live with.  Take a page out of your man’s script and flip it on him.  Fix a list in your mind of how your man could improve his ways and means in order for your life to be pleasant and acceptable with him.

Dear Margo: Cheating On, Then With, Your Wife

Hey Margo, don’t let this ex-wife/other woman off the hook!  This woman is seeking revenge against the other woman/fiancee because that woman wouldn’t abandon the relationship once the wife explained that the husband was also unfaithful to the fiancee.  That makes her pretty small in my opinion.  She’s secretly hoping that the fiancee will learn of the husband’s infidelity with the ex-wife and feel more betrayed than the wife ever did; even if it’s a drama being played out only in her mind.  She says she feels validated to know she’s still got it going on in the bedroom?  Hah!  That husband views her with even less esteem now because he’s certain that her SELF-esteem is so low that she’s decided she is exacting revenge on them by again having sex with him.  There’s nothing I hate to see more than a woman who is decieving herself into believing that having sex will determine the outcome as she wishes it to be.  A cheating man is never thinking about YOU—only himself in all encounters.    A man that doesn’t value your traits as a person will not be impressed by a sexual act which he can accomplish with any woman.  We’ve all got the same equipment, lady.

 If I was giving advice to the 23 year old lesbian I’d say:  Stay at home and date as freely as you would if you were heterosexual.  If your family feels that they can bluntly confront your personal choices than YOU should boldly give them something to confront and come to terms with.

Attorney General Eric Holder said the U.S. is a 'nation of cowards' when it comes to discussing race. Do you agree?

I hear ya, Tanja!  Although Attorney General Holder was specifically addressing the race relations of Whites and Blacks, the other groups you’ve mentioned will surely benefit from harmony.  My bad.

Attorney General Eric Holder said the U.S. is a 'nation of cowards' when it comes to discussing race. Do you agree?

Please, Sibelle, there’s no need to ridicule me for a typing error.  I meant to copy YOUR word "diplomatie" of which I am aware of the definition.  I did see your other post on the subject and didn’t feel the need to comment because I largely agreed with that comment.  I think I offended you when I asked about needing a script and for that I apologize.

Attorney General Eric Holder said the U.S. is a 'nation of cowards' when it comes to discussing race. Do you agree?

There is only one race:  the HUMAN race!  All the rest is skin color, nationality and cultural ethnicity.

Attorney General Eric Holder said the U.S. is a 'nation of cowards' when it comes to discussing race. Do you agree?

"Are we cowards?   I don’t believe we are.   I believe we have been taught to be politically correct and to keep our thoughts to ourselves.  I believe as you do on this, Deber.  However, when you state "we no longer have to deal with Affirmative Action or the antiquated race card." I stop agreeing.  How about we work on getting a SECOND Black American President into office before we starting thinking we’ve solved all of our problems regarding skin color?

Attorney General Eric Holder said the U.S. is a 'nation of cowards' when it comes to discussing race. Do you agree?

With open discussions and heartfelf admissions like this we sure will, Jennifer.  Thanks.

Attorney General Eric Holder said the U.S. is a 'nation of cowards' when it comes to discussing race. Do you agree?

I disagree, Dee.  Politically, I voted for Barack Obama because he had the better plan and strategy in my opinion.  My personal joy comes in sharing his bi-racial background.  But look in the mirror and honestly assess this: Your CHILD brings home a very black-skinned African American sales clerk, announcing plans to marry and live in your neighborhood and raise your grandchildren.  What FEELINGS about it ALL are stirred up?