Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.
Donald Duck

Donald Duck

My Comments (119 so far…)

Rosie O. Analyzes 'Angry' Ann Coulter

You prove my point. Liberals have nothing to say, so that the only way they can reply is to bash the messenger. It proves that you have nothing of substance to say.

Obama's AG Pick, Eric Holder, to Get Grilled at Confirmation

i believe he has a past the he needs to be addressesd. I’m not sure it will be addressed with this liberal left wing senate. As for his toughness, he has no real background in this area. Last Point: Since the liberal left has spent the last 8 years bashing Bush & Cheney, are you going to spend the next 4 (and I sure hope it’ts not 8) rehashing that it is BUSH’S FAULT. Liberals have already proven that they are bad loosers, but all indications they are BAD BAD WINNERS, as they want to RUB IT IN.

Could Ruth Madoff Have Known About Bad Bernie?

There are alot of divorce cases where one spouse does not find out what the other one has done until the marriage end. This works equally for both men & women. The courts many times do not recognize these issues equally, as many times the bad deeds of the woman is dimissed, while the bad deeds of the man are over scrutinized. I do not know the situation with the Mdoff’s, but she may not have known, or may has been a willing accompliss. If the latter is the case she should be equally procesecuted to the full extent of the law, not be allowed to get away with it. By all indications, Bernie is simply a crook, & should be removed from society for the remainder of his life. He will have to face his maker by himself

All But Vitter Back Clinton Confirmation

The bible says do judge, only God has the power to do that. What ever he has done he will have to some day face God. There are many democats & republicans that have been in trouble.

Sexting: The New Frontier of Flirting, Should You Do It?

Anothern stage in the lowering of the morality in this country, compliments of liberal left & their 40+ years of breaking down absolutes (black & white) as per their idea of anything goes. Unless we start to put God back into this country, it will only get worse until the End Time comes.

Rosie O. Analyzes 'Angry' Ann Coulter

Obama’s First Act as President by Chuck Norris Barack Obama emphatically promised more than a year ago, “The first thing I’d do as president is sign the Freedom of Choice Act.” Will he keep his word? The Freedom of Choice Act is a sweeping bill that would abolish all pro-life regulations across the nation, from parental notification laws to bans on federal funding of abortions. The Office of the General Counsel for the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops identified 13 categories of pro-life laws that would be stampeded and nullified by FOCA. As far-reaching as the decision of Roe v. Wade is into the states’ jurisdictions and our lives, even it, for example, showed certain respect for state laws and limits on infringing regulations in the medical field. FOCA shows no such restraints; it nails shut the coffin on pro-life choices and safeguards. And why has Obama pledged his allegiance to pass FOCA? Not only because he has the most passionately liberal pro-choice record of nearly any politician but also because, as he told a meeting of Planned Parenthood during his campaign, “it is time to turn the page” to a new day, when pro-life views and laws and debate on abortion are passé. And if he and the Democratic majority have their way, America will have that new day, one in which hundreds of thousands more abortions will be performed annually. (I still think it is utterly hypocritical that a president and a political party who pride themselves on providing and protecting minorities don’t include the unborn among those minorities.) The fight to pass FOCA is being waged despite a new nationwide survey revealing that about 4 in 5 U.S. adults would limit abortion’s legality. About 1 in 3 would limit abortion to rape, incest or saving a mother’s life. One-third also would limit abortion to either the first three months of pregnancy or the first six months. Only 9 percent said abortion should be legal for any reason at any time during pregnancy. These statistics are in stark contrast to the goals and objectives of FOCA, which would close the culture debate on abortion in an unprecedented way for any piece of legislation. America doesn’t need to “turn the page” on culture battles, such as abortion; it needs to reopen the pages of its history to our Founders’ heightened views about the rights of all human beings in the Declaration of Independence and our Constitution. And we need to revive and re-instill that value of humanity back into society, our children and our children’s children. Under our Constitution, the federal government should protect that right to life. But besides affirming that foundational human right, the details and debates of the laws governing abortion should be left to the states. Despite the Supreme Court’s unconstitutional striking down of abortion laws nationwide in 1973 and instituting a completely unconstitutional federal right to abortion, there is still much we can do at the state level to protect human life by promoting pro-life legislation and education. That is, unless FOCA is enacted into law. After 35 years of ceaseless controversy since the Supreme Court’s ruling in Roe v. Wade, some people think that abortion is an “old” issue better dropped. But as my friend and prolific author Randy Alcorn wrote in his small book “Why Pro-Life? Caring for the Unborn and Their Mothers”: “Abortion has set us on a dangerous course. We may come to our senses and back away from the slippery slope. Or we may follow it to its inescapable conclusion — a society in which the powerful, for their self-interest, determine which human beings will live and which will die.” Abortion is not about a woman’s “right to choose”; it is about a more fundamental “right to life,” which is one of three specifically identified unalienable rights in the Declaration of Independence (and the Constitution, through Article VII and the Bill of Rights). And it is a violation of government’s primary purpose: to protect innocent life. Thomas Jefferson wrote in 1809, “The care of human life and happiness, and not their destruction, is the first and only legitimate object of good government.” He was not, of course, writing about the America of today, with state-sanctioned and even subsidized abortion and a movement to promote the killing of the elderly through euthanasia. But he could have been. And his belief in what should be “the first and only legitimate object of government” still should stand, and that includes for the president of the United States of America. But if he and his administration won’t protect the rights of the living (even in the womb), then who will? Pelosi? Reid? A left-leaning Congress? All of our elected officials should uphold that pre-eminent objective of government and strive to get us back to the view of humanity that emphasizes the immortal worth of every human being. Without that, we never can believe that all people (including those in the womb) are created equal, that they have inherent, unalienable rights and that the protection of those rights is “the first and only legitimate object of good government.” And if our politicians won’t protect unborn human life, then we must. With Sanctity of Life Sunday on Jan. 18, Obama’s inauguration Jan. 20, the annual March for Life pro-life rally in Washington, D.C., Jan. 22 (the anniversary of the Roe v. Wade decision), and FOCA looming on the legislative precipice of Congress and the White House, now is the time to march and take action again to defend the unborn. (That’s why I devoted an entire chapter to “Reclaim the value of human life” in my new cultural manifesto, “Black Belt Patriotism,” and why my wife, Gena, passionately entreated for the unborn in our most recent interview, which you can watch online on GodTube.) Please, before FOCA flies onto the congressional floor in the upcoming days, sign the online petition to fight FOCA (www.fightfoca.com), and then contact your representatives and senators to tell them how you expect them to vote on the bill. You can write to them online by simply going to www.capwiz.com/nrlc/issues/bills/?bill=9668701 and entering your ZIP code.

Rosie O. Analyzes 'Angry' Ann Coulter

Just for you. if you were more concerned about the real issues, instead of attacking the messenger, you would be more credible. I see the constant garbage that appears on Conservative blogs all the time. The same liberals posting nothing, or attacking the messager.

Rosie O. Analyzes 'Angry' Ann Coulter

YOU LIBERALS JUST KEEP PROVING MY POINT. THE TRUTH HURTS, & YOU JUST CAN’T HELP YOURSELVES, BUT TO ATTACK THE MESSENGER. ANN COULTER IS THE MESSENGER, AND WHEN ANY CONSERVATIVE AGREES WITH HER, YOU HAVE NOTHING TO SAY. YOURSAVIOROBAMA WILL NOT SAVE YOU FROM ANYTHING, AS HE IS NOT GOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Rosie O. Analyzes 'Angry' Ann Coulter

ARE YOU AFRAID THE OF THE TRUTH OF THE BIBLE, OR DO YOU NOT BELIEVE IN GOD???????????????/

Rosie O. Analyzes 'Angry' Ann Coulter

Rosie O’Donnell is not courted by the Democrats or invited to air her opinions on political shows as a political expert or pundit, etc. MIGHT THAT BE, BECAUSE SHE HAS NOTHING OF SUBSTANCE TO SAY????????????????????????????????

Rosie O. Analyzes 'Angry' Ann Coulter

AS A CONSERVATIVE, I AGREE THAT ROSIE HAS NO INFLUENCE (EXCEPT ON OTHER LIBERALS), & ANN COULTER HAS ALOT OF INFLUENCE, BECAUSE SHE HAS SOMETHING OF SUBSTANCE TO SAY.

Rosie O. Analyzes 'Angry' Ann Coulter

THIS IS BECAUSE LIBERAL CAN’T STAND THE TRUTH. WHEN THE TRUTH IS PUT IN FRONT OF THEIR FACE, THEY HAVE NO SUBSTANCE. THEIR ONLY AVENUE IS ATTACH, SINCE THEY ONLY OPERATE FROM THIER EMOTIONS. THIS IS WHY ANN COULTER ANGERS THEM. SHE IS A VERY INTELLEGENT LADY, (WHO IS ALSO A VERY BEAUTIFUL WOMAN). SHE IS ABLE TO STATE THE TRUTH, & SINCE LIBERAL HAVE NOTHING TO ADD, THEY ATTACK. LOOK AT ALL THE BUSH BASHING BY LIBERALS IN CONGRESS, HOLLYWOOD (LOONEYWOOD), THE MSM & ALL OTHER LIBERALS

Rosie O. Analyzes 'Angry' Ann Coulter

YOU JUST PROVED MY POINT. ALL THAT LIBERALS CAN DO IS ATTACK & CALL NAMES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! GOTCHA

Rosie O. Analyzes 'Angry' Ann Coulter

I DO BELIEVE THAT THIS ISSUE BY YOU LIBERALS, OF ANN COULTER SELLING HER BOOKS, SHOWS ALOT OF ENVY. LIBERAL WOULD LIKE TO SELL BOOKS TO, BUT THOSE WHO HAVE TRIED, FOUND THAT NO ONE WANTED TO READ THEIR LEFT WING SOCIALIST DRIBBLE. CASES IN POINT: HC & HEREIT TAKES AVILLAGE TO RAISE A CHILDMOST OF THE BOOKS WERE GIVEN AWAY TO LIBERAL ORGANIZATIONS TO DISTRIBUTE FREE. ???????????????? CASE IN POINT: PELOSI’S BOOK WAS NUMBER1059 ON THE BEST SELLER LIST THE LAST I SAW. A REAL BARN BURNER SELLER????????????

Rosie O. Analyzes 'Angry' Ann Coulter

TO BE REPENTANT YOU FIRST HAVE TO BELIEVE IN GOD, AND CONFESS YOUR SINS TO GOD. THE BIBLE ALSO SAYS THAT MAN SHALL NOT BE THE JUDGE, ONLY GOD HAS THAT POWER. SO DO NOT JUDGE ANN COULTER, UNLESS YOU HAVE FIRST TAKEN THE SPLINTER OUT OF YOUR OWN EYE.