has anyone read all of these interviews in a row? I started with anticipation, wow, Meg Whitman, a woman I really would like to learn more about… And I am now underwhelmed. I don’t think it was the interviewer. And it may not have been the interviewee. I’m not sure. What I DO know is that none of it moved me. On the contrary, I was astounded at the shallowness of the whole. I don’t feel as if I know any better now anything more about a woman who apparently has been successful. There were a few bits and pieces that alluded to greater insight, however, none of it touched say, a New Yorker feature interview, or even a Vanity Fair article. Where is the depth I was expecting after the hype? Worse, it left me with a bit of a bad taste in regards to Meg W… not what I wanted to walk away with. If you want to compete with the big boys you’ve got to dig. This is coming from a successfully self-employed female of 44, SF through .com boom and bust, married 16 yrs, divorced, changed, still in the same field, still self employed, albeit now in Telluride, Colorado, and now finally happy, though perhaps not successful in the same way imagined in her 20s and 30s. Life changes. Can our perception of life and other successful women? Can we write about it and portray it in grabbing ways? Can we make headlines because we have *finally* achieved so much more than we imagined in our teens? Let me know, because I truly am interested…. Sandy