Sign in to wowOwow

Enter the email address that you used when registering at wowOwow.
The password field is case sensitive. Click here if you have forgotten your password.

Please register for wowOwow

Newsletter subscriptions
Sign up to receive wowOwow's weekly newsletter and get our best picks delivered right to your inbox. Our newsletter content is hand-picked by the wowOwow editorial team and provides the top features, news, and commentary from our site. Subscribing to our newsletter is free and safe. We will never share your email or other information with a third-party without your direct consent.
By registering, you indicate that you have read and agree
with our privacy policy and terms of service.
phyllis Doyle Pepe

phyllis Doyle Pepe

My Comments (4355 so far…)

Could Mammograms Fall Victim to Obamacare? by Liz Peek

Yes, I do realize that May is not "of late" as I said. Why on earth would he "come[ing] out and tell[ing] his people not to blame Bush," when they have reasons to do so? The comment of mine that you quote you obviously misunderstood.  It has nothing to do with a direct link to Obama.  Let me try and clarify it for you. Since this administration and Obama,  from the get go, from a certain segment of our population,  have been pilloried and tarred and feathered, the temptation to remind these folks exactly what the last administration dumped into this administration’s lap is understandable. I also said, if you go back and read exactly what I did say, was that this kind of thing runs its course. We have what we have and Obama has to deal with it.

Could Mammograms Fall Victim to Obamacare? by Liz Peek

Kathy Lee: Do you read or do you just spout? Your comment to me is supercilious  and presents you poorly.

Could Mammograms Fall Victim to Obamacare? by Liz Peek

Sweet baby Huey–––haven’t heard that in a long time. Huey would say to all this jimmerish––Phooey! I have missed you, old buddy! How’s by you?

Could Mammograms Fall Victim to Obamacare? by Liz Peek

I was saying where of late did OBAMA bring Bush into anything? You cite something from 08, and last May. The others you cite are not Obama and the content of their words are correct. Eight years is not something we can suddenly wish away, but it’s counterproductive to dwell on its catastrophic leavings. It’s also, when this administration is criticized for not being able to turn this country to its happy face, a temptation to remind people of why we are in the mess we are in.

Could Mammograms Fall Victim to Obamacare? by Liz Peek

Correction: isn’t as dire. And nailed was the operative word––nobody is shooting foot or head here!

Could Mammograms Fall Victim to Obamacare? by Liz Peek

Thank you Heather. And may I say, in order to counteract the poster below who believed you shot yourself in the foot (or head, I forget which) by using the word "Line" in reference to your friend, I’m glad he was able to be moved ahead of others whose surgery is as dire. 

Could Mammograms Fall Victim to Obamacare? by Liz Peek

There are many people who blame GW for the mess he left and they are right to do so. However, I don’t hear Obama doing this and yet we have so many who are saying he is. He has taken up this load and is dealing with it, is not yummering about it, is not invoking the name Bush in any speech of late, so where are people getting the idea he is not taking responsibility and still blaming Bush? I cannot believe I actually asked that question!

Could Mammograms Fall Victim to Obamacare? by Liz Peek

Amity Shlaes strikes again

When you hear claims that the New Deal made the depression worse, they often come directly or indirectly from the work of Amity Shlaes, whose misleading statistics have been widely disseminated on the right.

Now, Ms. Shlaes has found a new target: John Maynard Keynes. There’s a lot to critique in this piece, but this one takes the cake:

But the most telling fact about the new rush to spend is that its advocates have insisted on invoking the New Deal. They tend to gloss over the period when the phrase, “We are all Keynesians now,” was actually first uttered: the mid-1960s. (Uttered by Friedman, in fact, though he meant only that we all work in the terms of the Keynesian lexicon.)

The Great Society of that period was the ultimate Keynesian experiment, and it didn’t work very well.

Grr. Keynesianism says that deficit spending can help create jobs when the economy is depressed. The Great Society wasn’t deficit spending, it wasn’t intended to create jobs, and the economy of the 1960s wasn’t depressed. It was social engineering; we can talk about how well or badly it worked, but it had nothing whatsoever to do with Keynesian economics.

Now, LBJ did engage in some Keynesian economics: namely, he imposed acontractionary fiscal policy in the form of a tax surcharge in an effort to cool an overheating economy.

Alas, pretty soon we’ll have all the usual suspects saying that the Great Society proves that Keynesian economics doesn’t work — after all, the “experts” told them so.

by Paul Krugman

 

I just knew Ms. Peek would pick this  Mammogram  issue and try and link it to the Health Care Reform . This recommendation, by the way, is decades old. Any woman can get as many mammograms as they want, nothing is changed here. 

 

 

 

What's your viewpoint on a one-term presidency for Obama, no matter the reason?

Huh? Sybil, I’m  confused. By "former" leader you are referring to Bush, but you use the present tense saying he is leading us into communism, then you mentioned someone named "Husseim" who you say the  American people put in the oval office, then add our forefathers must be shocked?  Sure hope you can clear this up because I’m left with a mish- mash of information that leaves me puzzled––especially the reaction of the forefathers, who I thought had died long ago.

What's your viewpoint on a one-term presidency for Obama, no matter the reason?

Whatever it was you wanted to say, it somehow, mysteriously has gone away. Don’t feel bad, many of my posts lately cannot go through until I copy those crazy numbers and letters because they think I am SPAM! And I try so hard to be nice!

P.S. I used to eat Spam in my college days––we used to fry it, put it on a roll with lettuce, tomatoes, a little mustard and if I remember, it was quite tasty. 

What's your viewpoint on a one-term presidency for Obama, no matter the reason?

And speaking of the constitution: Learned Hand, one of the greatest judges in the 20th century, did not see the constitution from a narrow "originalist" view, didn’t believe that document served to "embalm the habits of 1789" and said it was "not a strait-jacket but a charter for a living people. Hand feared, in an age of mass communication, that society could fall under "the power of the conglomerate conscience of a mass of Babbitts, whose intelligence we do not approve and whose standards we may detest." Nonetheless, he believed strongly that the democratic process was superior to any alternative, and that almost any popular initiative was likely to be less dangerous than the consequences of its suppression.

What's your viewpoint on a one-term presidency for Obama, no matter the reason?

Do you recall this little ditty sung, to the tune of "Twinkle, Twinkle, Little Star," by American advisors  during the war?

We are winning, this we know

General Harkins tells us so.

In the delta, things are rough.

In the mountains, mighty tough.

But we’re winning, this we know.

General Harkins tells us so.

If you doubt this is true,

McNamara says so ,too. 

What's your viewpoint on a one-term presidency for Obama, no matter the reason?

Maggie: Your emphasis on education is welcome. It is where we need resources and concentration more than ever. And yes, Obama has and will continue to put education in the forefront of policies. 

What's your viewpoint on a one-term presidency for Obama, no matter the reason?

alice ruth: citizen of common sense, perspicacity, and darn good advice. Thank you, Alice, would there be more of you.